In this interview, Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies, who worked as a senior software engineer at Google and YouTube for over eight years, shares his inside knowledge of this global monopoly, revealing why Google is not a reliable source of information anymore.
Google’s monopoly over search is matched by a continued reassurance that it is an unbiased search platform. Google is actively suppressing and censoring information, proving it is anything but unbiased.
While some of the information revealed is related to politics, you can read about my views about the two-party U.S. federal government here.
The point of sharing this information is that Google is manipulating search results to reflect its views, and to influence our social behavior while denying this is happening.
The Wall Street Journal just published a thorough investigation covering these same points.
Vorhies recently released about 950 pages of internal Google documents that paint a comprehensive picture of what’s really going on. You can find all of those documents on the Project Veritas website.1
What Happened to ‘Don’t Be Evil’?
Like NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden before him, Vorhies is a courageous patriot who is trying to do the right thing by warning everyone about how Google is now manipulating and censoring the global storehouse of internet-based information.
“Everything started out with Google really great,” Vorhies says. “They had this mission statement of organizing the world’s information and making it universally accessible and useful. They also had this idea of ‘Don’t be evil.’ It was built right into their initial public offering (IPO) statements.
I thought at the time, ‘This is great. This is exactly the kind of company that the world needs. We need to organize all the world’s information and make it universally accessible. We need to let the algorithms decide what goes to the top and let the users decide what’s most useful for them and then make sure that other people are able to find that information.’
Google stayed true to those principles all the way up until 2016, until Donald Trump won the election. For some reason, they decided they were going to throw all these mission statements away and go after the president of the United States, censor the internet and distort the news so that people’s searches could be redirected towards antipresidential sentiment.
This eventually morphed into not just censorship of the president, but censorship of information related to health … I realized [that] if this was allowed to continue, then this agenda of Big Pharma would be able to become … ‘the truth’ …
Once I found out that Google was censoring a lot of information, I started looking at the information it was censoring with a new degree of ‘They wouldn’t be censoring it unless it was true,’ sort of thing.
It’s a strange heuristic to use to figure out what’s true in the world, but you’ve just got to figure out what they’re censoring. You kind of understand that they’re censoring it because it’s not Big Tech-friendly. It’s not friendly to the established players.”
Some ‘Fake News’ Isn’t so Fake After All
Shortly after Trump won the presidential election, you started hearing more and more about the scourge of “fake news.” Google, like Facebook and others, decided they had to protect users from fake news. The problem is, who determines what’s fake and what’s not?
Using Google’s internal search engine, Vorhies set out to determine what Google’s definition of fake news was. He found several examples in a presentation. However, in it were actual, verifiably real news events. “I went, ‘Wait a minute. Is this about fake news or is this about controlling the narrative for like political purposes?'” Vorhies says.
He began collecting these documents because he knew they were explosive enough that Google would remove them if word ever got out about them. In his continued search for real news presented as fake, he started unearthing other disturbing projects.
“The main project responsible for Google censorship is a thing called ‘Machine Learning Fairness’ (ML Fairness). As you imagine, they’re not going to call their censorship regime something bad. They’re going to call it something like ‘fairness.’
So, if you’re against that, you’re against fairness. It’s a euphemism. I discovered there was this umbrella project, ‘ML Fairness,’ and there were these subcomponents like ‘Project Purple Rain,’ which is a 24-hour response team that is monitoring the internet.”
How Machine Learning Fairness Twists Perception of Reality
Just what is ML Fairness and how does it work? Vorhies explains:
“Let’s say that this circle right here represents the entire spectrum of all possible artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. ML Fairness is a small part of that type of AI. It’s a relatively new type of AI. What machine learning does is it simulates brain neurons and how they fire.
If you remember how a brain neuron fires, it takes in as input signals from other neurons and then mixes those signals together and decides whether it wants to fire or not, based on the signals that it receives.
Well, these artificial neurons do something similar. They have a collection of inputs, depending on the internal rule set. It will fire depending on the inputs it gets … And then that output is used as input for further downstream processing.
If you have this collection of millions of simulated neurons … you can start to create very complex behavior that’s able to solve problems, like chess or the game Go … It can classify hate speech. That’s the part that’s interesting to me — how this thing could be used to classify information across the internet.
ML Fairness is a type of AI that takes information on the internet, classifies it and then ranks it. And then the Google engine will figure out whether the information is fair or not. And if it is ‘fair,’ it goes to the top. If it’s not fair, then it gets pushed to the bottom. That’s what ML Fairness is in a nutshell.”
What this manipulation ultimately ends up doing is presenting a twisted and false view of the world. What you’re seeing in your search results is what the AI algorithm decided is most fair — not what’s actually happening in the real world.
This is how you now end up getting automated search suggestions such as “men can have periods” and “men can have babies,” even though these are biological impossibilities. However, the algorithm deems the idea that only women can menstruate and bear children as “unfair” and basically “sexist,” and thus it’s pushing these ridiculous search suggestions to the top.
This obnoxious discrepancy is clear when using search terms like “men can …” The manipulation of reality will not be as transparent when using health or political search words, when you cannot be absolutely sure, ahead of time, about what the absolute truth is.
Did Google Conspire to Commit Treason?
Vorhies saw these changes starting to take place in early 2017. Next, Google announced it was going to start assigning an “authoritativeness score” to all news content. “I was able to see this ranking on internal documents,” Vorhies says. High rankings were given to outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal.
“These outlets, in my opinion, have been producing propaganda,” Vorhies says. “They led to us into war with Iraq with the weapons of mass destruction hoax. They’ve lied to us [about] Vietnam. They have a history of supporting every war and military encouragement around the world that has [led to] the destruction of millions of lives.”
In June 2017, chief executive officer of YouTube, Susan Wojcicki, announced that this was how they were going to filter news content across the YouTube platforms. As Vorhies expected, this led to a clamp down on anything that goes against the mainstream narrative.
“Around that time, I had the fortune of catching [another] seditious activity by Google. What I caught them doing was deleting words out of the translation dictionary from Arabic to English, in order to make a Trump tweet sound crazy.2,3“
President Trump had recently come back from a visit to Saudi Arabia when, on May 31, 2017, he tweeted: “Despite the negative constant press, covfefe.” Originally, people were able to translate “covfefe” to “We will stand up.” Taken together, you could see President Trump’s tweet basically said, “Despite the negative constant press, we will stand up.”
“People got really excited about that,” Vorhies says. “Well, The New York Times decided that they were going to write an entire article saying, ‘Actually, this word is nonsense. And everyone who thinks there’s a decode is just wrong.’
The same day that this article came out, I believe it was June 1, 2017, a senior executive person at Google … of one of the AI divisions, wrote up a design document saying, ‘We translated this world from Arabic to English. But according to The New York Times, that’s not right. That’s actually nonsense, so let’s get rid of the word.’ And so, they got rid of the word.
The team that was responsible for getting rid of this word called themselves the ‘Derrida Team.’ Why is that significant? Because there was a French philosopher by the name of Jacques Derrida, who advocated for the destruction of Western culture through the manipulation and censorship of language.
What a coincidence that this team responsible for censoring words would have the same name as this very significant philosopher who is considered the father of post-modernism.
About six days later, I saw the newspapers were making a push for invoking the 25th Amendment to remove a sitting president from office due to mental incapacitation. One of the reasons that they cited was how Trump was tweeting nonsense.
Now, wait a minute, that was made nonsense by this manipulation of the dictionary! I realized these people have gone too far. There’s obviously a collusion here. I have to bring this to attention no matter what.
This isn’t because I’m necessarily a Trump supporter — I didn’t vote for him — this is simply because they can’t be doing this to a sitting president of the United States. That just can’t happen. It’s treason.
If this is going to happen, then I’ve got to let the public [and] law enforcement know about it. Because if I don’t, then I’m part of a conspiracy of silence … It was at that point that I decided I could no longer sit in silence. I took my cache of documents and I started to prepare for a disclosure event.”
YouTube Censorship Has Had Lethal Consequences
In 2018, the real-world ramifications of censorship hit home when an Iranian YouTube creator who had recently been demonetized marched into YouTube headquarters and opened fire on employees and then shot herself.4
“Her name was Nasim [Najafi Aghdam]. She had a video that went viral in Iran … She was creating really bizarre videos that were just — I don’t know — I watched them and I actually strangely loved them. I couldn’t stop watching them. They were so weird.
She decided that she was going to quit her job and become a full-time content creator, like millions of others … YouTube was the platform to do that. Everyone was getting a lot of subscribers and were trying to generate money, get monetized on the platform …
They would get a cut of the ads that were running when people interact with the ads or view them … What YouTube did is they made a blanket ban. Anyone under 10,000 subscribers got censored. By censorship, I mean demonetized. They lost all of the funding that they could get for their videos. They can still post videos, they just [cannot] get any money [from Google Ads] for it.
And so, this person had just lost her job. She felt she was being oppressed by YouTube. She drove all the way from San Diego, came to the YouTube headquarters on 901 Cherry Avenue … came into the lunch area patio, took out a handgun and started firing …
She shot a couple of people. Ran out of ammo, reloaded and shot some more and then [shot] herself in the chest and [bled] to death … Obviously, this person was mentally deranged but, also, she was triggered by Google’s censorship. Now I’ve got this very personal story about how censorship has affected my safety.
You would think that maybe YouTube would [rethink] its censorship, but no. They didn’t … Every day I would come into work and I would think, ‘You know, with this increase in censorship, is someone [else] going to come in with a gun?'”
Google Attempts to Destroy Vorhies by ‘Lawfare’
Vorhies resigned from Google June 28, 2019, and was immediately put under investigation, as the company had logs showing the many documents he’d been searching for and reading through. Vorhies tells the story of what happened next:
“When I went to Project Veritas, I went under anonymity. We only released two pages of the 950 that they had [been given]. My hope was that Google would leave me alone … But they decided they weren’t going to do that.
They decided they were going to attempt to financially destroy me by engaging in lawfare, which is warfare via the legal system. Within a few weeks of me disclosing ML Fairness to Project Veritas, they sent me threatening letters, demanding access to all my data outside of work …
I wrote them back a letter admitting I had retained files, telling them I had given them to law enforcement … The NDA, the nondisclosure agreement I signed is nonenforceable in cases where the company is committing criminal activity. Sedition is criminal activity, which means that the NDA is null and void.
I can submit evidence of Google’s criminal activity to the government and to the media when the company is engaging in unlawful activity. That’s what I did. Also, I signed the NDA in good faith, believing that Google’s word of organizing the world’s information and making it universally accessible and useful and ‘Don’t be evil,’ were truthful statements …
I met an attorney who was representing Kevin Cernekee, another Google engineer who attempted to blow the whistle in the most legitimate way possible, which was to notify the Federal Labor Relations Authority in California. Kevin gave these papers to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
Google responded by ambushing him with HR, seizing his laptop, seeing all the documents that he had downloaded, and then firing him and creating a legal theory that he had hacked into Google to get documents so that he could reconstruct Google’s legal strategy and maybe even sell it.
They applied criminal charges against him. They made him defend himself in court for his collection of evidence that he had sent to the NLRB. He’s [spent] $100,000 dollars of his own money defending himself [against] Google, so I knew what was in store for me.
[Cernekee’s] lawyer was like, ‘Yeah. This is the first step in a very painful process that’s going to drive on for years. They’re going to make it very expensive. Their goal is to destroy you.’ Well, in that case, I’m not going to fight in the legal law. I’m going to fight in the court of public opinion.
I decided at that point to come out to Project Veritas and disclose who I was so that I could get eyes [on me], and I said, ‘If Google’s going to take me down, then I’m going to leverage that so that everyone else can see what they do and what they’re really about. And then we can make Google’s censorship program part of the national discussion.’
I disclosed everything. I released it to the public, all 950 pages … August 17, 2019 … [I’ve] tried to become a cultural force so that we can hold Google to account of what they’re doing, because their censorship is wrong.
It’s wrong for America. It’s anti-American. Their election meddling is something that needs to be looked at, needs to be watched, because they’ve meddled with the elections in the past. They’re meddling in the elections now.
They were able to deactivate Tulsi Gabbard’s ad account directly following the Democratic debates. They’ve meddled in the Ireland elections. They’ve meddled in the Brazil elections.
We know this because there was a Supreme Court ruling that released the evidence showing they had a secret agreement with one of the politicians to generate dirt and boost it up on the current president of Brazil.”
How Autofill Can Shift Political Opinion
Vorhies goes on to explain and describe how Google tools such as autofill search recommendations can be used to sway public opinion on political (and other topics), which can have significant political consequences.
Autofill is what happens when you start typing a search query into a search engine and algorithms kick in to offer suggestions to complete your search. We’ve been led to believe that whatever the autofill recommendations are is what most people are in fact searching for — Google has stated that the suggestions given are generated by a collection of user data — but that’s not true, at least not anymore.
“This story about the autofill first got disclosed by Dr. Robert Epstein, who is a Harvard-trained psychologist and former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today,” Vorhies explains.
“What he said was that Google had flipped a bunch of votes for Hillary using this autosuggest feature. I’ve investigated this claim. I’ve verified it to be true … It turns out that a lot of the popular searches were being suppressed.
For example, you typed in ‘Clinton body count.’ It’s a popular search term. This brings up all the people who have died in the decades that were associated with Hillary Clinton.
Well, this search result has been deleted off the search suggestion. What’s happened instead is that a bunch of negative search terms have been inserted that went against the current president of the United States, Donald Trump.
So, when you’re typing in search queries for Trump, it’s autocompleting and suggesting, ‘Do you mean that he’s a liar? That he’s a crook?’ … And then you do the same for Hillary Clinton and it has all these positive terms … They were doing this on the political stuff.
The most significant thing about this feature is the fact that you don’t expect to have this part of your online experience to be hatched for political reasons. You think that this is legitimately what other people are searching for.
As a result, you don’t have your filters on. Your brain puts on these filters when it starts to evaluate politically charged information. When you read a newspaper article, you may be thinking to yourself, ‘This may be true, this may not.’ You’re skeptical.
But when you’re typing into a search, you don’t think that because you don’t think that’s rigged, so whatever bias is inherent in that search result slips through and goes directly into your subconscious. This is what Epstein was explaining.”
The Search Engine Manipulation Effect
Epstein developed a “black box test” (a method of software testing) to measure just how influential a tool like autofill can be. Remarkably, his test demonstrated that “Google’s ‘autocomplete’ search suggestions can turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into a 90/10 split”5,6 — all without anyone being aware of the manipulation.
Similarly, when Epstein looked at the power of search engine manipulation to shift preferences and perceptions, he found that:7
“(1) biased search rankings can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20% or more, (2) the shift can be much higher in some demographic groups, and (3) such rankings can be masked so that people show no awareness of the manipulation.”
The good news is, there are ways to lower this manipulation effect, but to do so, people have to be aware that biased ranking is taking place. In his 2017 paper, “Suppressing the Search Engine Manipulation Effect,” Epstein writes:8
“A recent series of experiments demonstrated that introducing ranking bias to election-related search engine results can have a strong and undetectable influence on the preferences of undecided voters.
This phenomenon, called the search engine manipulation effect (SEME), exerts influence largely through order effects that are enhanced in a digital context.
We present data from three new experiments involving 3,600 subjects in 39 countries in which we replicate SEME and test design interventions for suppressing the effect. In the replication, voting preferences shifted by 39.0%, a number almost identical to the shift found in a previously published experiment (37.1%).
Alerting users to the ranking bias reduced the shift to 22.1%, and more detailed alerts reduced it to 13.8%. Users’ browsing behaviors were also significantly altered by the alerts, with more clicks and time going to lower-ranked search results.
Although bias alerts were effective in suppressing SEME, we found that SEME could be completely eliminated only by alternating search results — in effect, with an equal-time rule.
We propose a browser extension capable of deploying bias alerts in real-time and speculate that SEME might be impacting a wide range of decision-making, not just voting, in which case search engines might need to be strictly regulated.”
As pointed out by Vorhies, “We’ve got to watch out for Google, because … they’re going to try to rig the 2020 elections.” Based on Epstein’s results, Google certainly appears to have the power to do so. The only way to prevent it may be an information campaign that exposes this hidden agenda, thereby helping to suppress this search engine manipulation effect.
Do a Google Detox
How can you prevent getting sucked into the false-reality vortex that is Google? Vorhies offers a number of suggestions for how to minimize Google’s influence over your life:
- Stop using Google search. Options include DuckDuckGo9 and Startpage10
- Stop using Gmail. ProtonMail,11 which provides end-to-end encryption and less spam, is an excellent option
- Switch from an android phone (powered by Google) to an iPhone. While not perfect, iPhone is slightly better of the two
There are alternatives for most if not all Google products, and by using these other companies, we can help them grow so that Google becomes less and less relevant.
“Use iPhone, use DuckDuckGo and use Protonmail. Those three things will get most of Google out of your life,” Vorhies says. “I’ve been a lot happier because of that. I know [Google is] able to read everything that I write when I’m on Gmail or I’m using one of their services. I’ve had people who want to interview me on YouTube, and then their YouTube pages get destroyed.”
Also, stop using Google docs (Digital Trends has published an article suggesting a number of alternatives12) and if you’re a high school student, do not convert the Google accounts you created as a student into personal accounts.
Both the Chrome and Firefox browsers have also been compromised by Google, so consider switching if you’re on either of those. Brave is my personal favorite, but the Opera browser is another alternative.13 Vorhies is also a fan of Brave.
“The guy who created this browser, Brave … added features to eliminate all the ads. Now my MacBook runs like new. I’ve got a 2012 MacBook. I thought I had to upgrade it in order to make it run fast.
[Using] Brave instead, my computer operates five times faster when it [has] a lot of browser tabs open. It’s phenomenal. Not only do I get to Google detox, but I get a better experience by not using Google. It’s a no-brainer. People should just use it. And all of the plug-ins I use, like LastPass, which contains all of my passwords, they all install.”
Support Vorhies’ ‘Disclosure Tour’
In the interview, Vorhies recounts a long harrowing incident in which Google instructed local police to perform a mental wellness check on him, which escalated into a full-blown evacuation of the entire street due to a fake bomb threat, confabulated in an effort to get him out of his apartment. To get the full scoop on that story, please listen to the interview above.
He also discusses how Google’s censorship of things like holistic health and clean energy developments is actually evidence that a better future is ahead. The drug and oil industries are starting to lose their grip as safer, less expensive and more effective alternatives are gaining ground. Censorship is a last-ditch effort to hold on to a crumbling paradigm.
As Vorhies mentioned earlier, his primary focus right now is to raise awareness about Google and to create a cultural force for change. You can help by sharing this article and video, and by following Vorhies on Twitter. His handle is PerpetualManiac (Twitter.com/PerpetualManiac).
“If you click the follow button, you’ll be part of a collection of patriots who are looking to ensure the survival of the republic, to ensure sovereignty and to bring Google to account for the censorship they’re doing. People are helping me raise awareness by retweeting the things I’m saying. Because honestly, I’m fighting giants,” Vorhies says.
“If [Google is] going to take me down, then I’m just going to go down fighting. I’m going to leverage everything they do to further the great awakening that’s happening right now in the United States and across the world.
I’m doing that because, ultimately, I’m in service to a higher power … I believe this magnificent creative force in the universe wants people to be free. It’s up to us to ensure that the freedoms we enjoy are handed down to our children … our grandchildren and our collective future.”
Alphabet’s Google Being Sued for
Censoring Conservative Content
as Corporate Policy
As incredible as it may sound, Google actually disabled AdSense on the SOTN website for posting our own articles. This occurred on March 2, 2017 as seen in the email screen-capture posted below.
Let’s try that again: the StateoftheNation2012.com website was penalized for publishing an article originally written by SOTN.
The Google email sent to SOTN (see the following screenshot) makes clear that the alleged offense to their program policies was “scraping”, which never occurred. How, pray tell, can SOTN be in violation by posting our own content. This is absurd and unlawful. It’s also in violation of Google AdSense policy, as well as a flagrant form of censorship.
KEY POINT: The alleged transgression cited by Google was “scraping”. Scraping occurs when a website lifts a story or post from another website owner and posts it on their site. In the case shown above, Google is asserting that SOTN scraped its own original content even though authorship has always been State of the Nation. Most
significantly, this particular article was originally posted at SOTN.
However, what Google was really telling SOTN is that we will outright censor your Alt Media website whenever the nature of the content is too politically sensitive, factually scandalous or criminally radioactive.
Now, here is the specific link that SOTN was cited for: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?page_id=72939 as seen in the Google email sent to us on Thursday, March 2.
The title of that article is: PEDOGATE: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened for Deep State and the C.I.A. The subtitle of the same post: P E D O G A T E: A Global Child Trafficking and Exploitation Crime Syndicate.
It’s true that SOTN was one of the first websites on the Internet to zealously disseminate the memes Pedogate and Pizzagate. Quite obviously, Google became well aware of this reality very early on during our worldwide multi-media campaign to mainstream Pizzagate and Pedogate, which we did quite successfully. This carefully crafted plan of disclosure was executed during the month of November 2016, especially during the first week leading up to the election. In other words, the Russians really had nothing to do with Hillary’s epic defeat; rather, it was Pizzagate that guaranteed Donald Trump’s victory.
Google’s AI brain also knows that SOTN designed a deliberate series of sub-memes regarding the various Pedogate child exploitation crime syndicates. As a matter of historical fact, SOTN purposefully created the following tagline which has since been used by hundreds of websites around the world to bring instant understanding to the two different, yet very similar, child exploitation scandals that destroyed Clinton’s candidacy.
“Pizzagate is Local, Pedogate is Global”
— State of the Nation
What’s the critical point here.
Google, LLC possesses a highly advanced content monitoring mechanism which is able to determine the thought leaders and major influencers on the Internet. If your site has been identified as a conservative thought leader that initiates viral Internet campaigns, devises new memes and influences many other Alt Media sites, you are targeted in ways that only Google can target your web-based business and/or website(s). This premeditated and malicious IT process utilized by Google is especially operative when your website has been categorized as Alt Right.
Conversely, if your site is labelled a Mainstream Media website or is an affiliated news outlet, you are given free rein to post away your ultra-liberal content with wanton abandon … without any fear of being blacklisted or downgraded or censored or shadow-banned in any way. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, as well as other major social media platforms, also use similar techniques but not the way that all-powerful Google can get away with. For when your site gets on Google’s wrong side, your content is effectively buried on the last pages of a Google search…if you’re lucky!
How do we know this?
When our previously referenced original article on Pedogate was first posted, it was picked up by everyone. SOTN viralized it in a manner that only our network can do. Quite predictably the article rose to the top of the first page of a Google search when the search term was typed “pedogate”. Today — July 14, 2018 — you can’t even find the article in a Google search. Now that’s some very serious censorship!
$100 billion class action lawsuit
The actual story is really much more complicated and certainly longer than what has been presented here thus far. But hopefully everyone in the Alt Media will get the gist of it. And especially the utter seriousness of Google’s ongoing violation of the 1st Amendment (which sometimes constitutes both civil and criminal conduct). They really believe that can act with such impunity whereby they can unilaterally remove the AdSense ad delivery network from conservative-leaning sites even for posting their own content.
It’s not just SOTN or TMR or other affiliates that are getting systematically censored like this, all of us are to varying degrees. That’s why this legal action is proceeding as a class action suit. Ever since SOTN reported on the transparent censorship by Google, many other sites have complained of similar experiences. Or, they have suffered censorship that’s even more obvious and offensive to the laws of the land.
We invite each and every website that has been a victim of Google’s well established predatory censorship policies to send us an email. No need to send reams of hard evidence or volumes of documentation at this time since our legal team is still taking shape. This lawsuit initiative is quite massive. The necessary legal work will begin in earnest when a sufficient number of conservative attorneys have either volunteered their services on a pro bono basis…or have agreed to join on a contingency basis.
Therefore, we respectfully ask every Google victim to pass this post along to their legal counsel. The more attorneys that contribute to this monumental cause for preserving
“Freedom of Speech”, the greater the likelihood of winning this $100 billion class action lawsuit. The only way to realistically protect the First Amendment is to directly confront any and all major challenges to it. Yes, this battle is a classic “David and Goliath” contest, in this case “Alt Media vs. Google”; nevertheless, it MUST BE FOUGHT sooner or later.
Most importantly, however, is the absolute necessity of having Google (and Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) legally and corporately reclassified as social media utilities. For only in this way will the proper oversight be exerted in order to immediately terminate the naked censorship that these MSM behemoths methodically employ.
Facebook censorship also requires a class action lawsuit
Ever since SOTN published its first article of a 13-part series on Putin’s Russia, Facebook began censoring our content as well. Or readers from around the world would email and call us to inform us of their inability to post any SOTN articles on Facebook. See: FACEBOOK Censors SOTN: Started With ‘Secret History Revealed’ Essay on Vladimir Putin
As a matter of fact, we just received the following screenshot from one of our loyal visitors this week indicating that Facebook would not allow SOTN posts on their platform.
The article that Facebook just censored is about a social issue that Mark Zuckerberg himself has taken a strong stand on; hence, Facebook routinely bans any posts that are in any way critical of abortion. Which is why the Facebook censoring software prevents the following article from appearing anywhere on their social media platform. THE ABORTION CONSPIRACY: Ultra-Secret Back Story Finally Revealed
What makes this patently illicit Facebook censorship so exasperating and twisted is that Facebook’s social media technology was actually stolen from Leader Technologies. Michael McKibben, CEO of Leader Technologies, has even taken the extraordinary legal initiative of filing a trillion dollar bond lien on the US government. See: LEADER TECHNOLOGIES FILES TRILLION DOLLAR BOND LIEN ON THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
Furthermore, everyone knows by now how Facebook is notorious for shadow-banning every poster and any post they so choose to. This is just one of many techniques that Facebook has in its tool chest to surreptitiously censor any content it finds politically incorrect. See: SHADOW-BANNED: How Facebook Censors You Without You Knowing
The crucial point is that Google attempted to coerce SOTN into taking down what is perhaps the single most important exposé ever written and published by StateoftheNation2012. Exactly who has the power to compel Google to perpetrate such a reckless act of blatant censorship. Just how deep has Deep State penetrated Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. … or were they just all created by the CIA’s Mockingbird Media operation in collaboration with DARPA.
Irrespective of precisely who the corporate criminals really are, they must be held accountable… and sooner than later. The overwhelming influence that Deep State now exerts over global media is such that there will soon be a worldwide lockdown. Any website that dares to publish the truth will be summarily blacklisted forever in the not-too-distant future. Some countries are even passing legislation that imposes various civil penalties and criminal punishments for posting raw truth.
Any site owner that wants to join this class action lawsuit can do so by sending us their intention to the following email: CensorshipLawsuit@gmail.com.
Please be aware that this legal process is in a rudimentary stage of development. SOTN is setting up a dedicated website that will be used to keep fellow plaintiffs apprised of all major developments. Because of competing time demands we are unable to respond to the many inquiries which always follow in the wake of these types of legal initiatives. As more attorneys climb on board this censorship litigation train, we will be able to offer a response to each potential litigant.
Thanks to everyone who has the courage and intestinal fortitude to weather this class action suit process. They are always challenging and purposefully drawn out by the defendants throughout the period of the proceedings. Even after the final rulings are rendered they are usually challenged and appealed.
Nonetheless, when such un-American censorship becomes institutionalized it must be addressed by people of conscience and websites that post the truth. Is that you? Are your site readers and viewers ardently seeking the truth? If the answer is yes, then it’s time for all of us “Davids” to sling our shots at every “Goliath” on the Internet battlefield today. To neglect to do so will put all of our truth-posting platforms in great peril.
State of the Nation
July 14, 2018
It’s quite telling that Google chose the highly revelatory “Pedogate” article to use to illegally shut down our much-needed AdSense revenue. Since we have never asked for donations on our sites, we heavily relied on AdSense to stay financially solvent. It has been an extraordinary struggle to simply maintain our many sites since they cut off all of our revenues. Were it not for a single benefactor, all of our websites would have been closed down over a year ago. For anyone who is inclined to provide financial aid to this cause, please feel free to PayPal a donation to: CensorshipLawsuit@gmail.com.
The U.S. Government is asking Apple and Google to hand over information on gun owners who have a scope on their rifles and use an app called Obsidian 4. Forbes reports the Department of Justice filed “an application for a court order” on September 5, 2019, the goal of which is to have information released on…
By Helen Buyniski – Helen of Destroy – August 28, 2019 If you had the opportunity to interview a whistleblower from one of the world’s most powerful companies after he’d leaked nearly 1,000 pages of internal company documents revealing the company is not only manipulating US politics, but working hard to alter the very fabric of […]
Originally posted on Nwo Report: Source: Mike Adams | NaturalNews.com (Natural News) By late 2020, Google’s Chrome browser will automatically block all so-called anti-cancer, “anti-vax” and anti-GMO websites as part of Google’s collapse into a Monsanto/Pharma criminal cartel. Users who want to visit websites that expose the scientifically-validated risks and potential harm of vaccines, chemotherapy,…