DID CONGRESS & TRUMP PROVIDE THE ULTIMATE TAX REMEDY? HIDDEN IN THE RULES?

26814843_10211006922870838_2155060789529974593_n

 

 

 

 

 

THEY JUST BROKE THE ABUSIVE U.S. TAX SYSTEM WITH THE NEW INCOME TAX LAW (H.R. 1 – Dec. 2017)

LINK TO BILL – then click on Constitutional Authority Statement

The new federal personal income tax law, H.R. 1, – that was just enacted into law by Congress in December 2017, and already made effective as of January 1st, 2018, has the immediate legal effect of:

1. completely disemboweling and destroying the I.R.S.’ current personal income tax collection and enforcement practices and operations, by removing them entirely and completely from all legitimate constitutional authority to act to enforce the direct taxation of income under the 16th Amendment, as practiced for the last 60 years;

2. strips the federal Department of Justice naked in the courtroom of all of its illegitimate constitutional arguments that have been made in the courtroom for the last 60 years, to sustain the federal court’s (both district and tax courts’) erroneous enforcement of a direct and unapportioned tax upon the income of We the American People under alleged authority of the 16th Amendment; and

3. completely exposes the federal judiciary’s unlawful enforcement of the federal personal income tax under the 16th Amendment over the last 60 years of American history, as nothing but a complete and total judicially committed fraud that plainly and clearly can now be seen as the true judicial conspiracy of sedition that it is,

– to undermine and remove the constitutional limitations placed upon the federal taxing powers, in order to enforce the unconstitutionally direct taxation of the labors and work (“wages” and “salaries“) of the American People, in order to fund, not the legitimate operation of the government, but the constitutionally unauthorized progressive, liberal, Fabian, socialist programs effecting the re-distribution of wealth that have been by used by the politicians to create the welfare based, class warfare system of taxation that has resulted in the divisive destruction of America, its people’s Freedom, Liberty, private property, and equal rights;

– by expanding the judicial authority beyond that which is constitutionally authorized, to enable the federal judiciary to constitutionally usurp the legislative authority of the Congress, through the judicial enforcement of only the perverted judicial Fabian opinions they issue, in place of the actual written constitutional tax law that is authorized and exists.

What ? You may say – that’s crazy. What the hell are you talking about ?

It’s the same tax it’s always been ! There’s nothing new in the law that could do that ! Yea, – that’s right, it’s the same income tax law that it has always been, and now they have admitted it on the Congressional Record, and their world is about to change, – well, actually, implode.

Congress has no idea of what they have done, or of the true extent or size of the catastrophe within the tax enforcement system, that they have wrought with the new income tax law, and few Americans, if any have realized it yet,

– but any honest lawyer will tell you (after reading this) that everything you are about to read (and have read up to this point in this article) is irrefutably true.

FACT: For the last 60 years the IRS has been issuing income tax collection correspondence to Americans asserting that American citizens owe the payment of an income tax on their work, because of the adoption of the 16th Amendment. This claim to legal authority is all over their website; it is in their “frivolous Arguments” propaganda publications, where they repeatedly assert the income taxing authority under the 16th Amendment, and label as frivolous any reference made to the limitations on the taxing powers imposed under Article I of the Constitution; and, it is in the pleadings made on the record of the court by the United States as a plaintiff, in every tax case prosecuted in the federal courts in the last 30 years.

FACT: The Department of Justice attorneys argue in every single income tax case prosecuted in the federal courts, that the income tax is owed by the individual defendant as a function of the 16th Amendment alone, without use or need of any “applicability” of the authorized indirect Article I, Section 8, impost, duty and excise taxing powers.

FACT: For the last 60 years the federal courts have been wrongfully allowing and upholding the constitutionally prohibited, and therefore unconstitutional, direct taxation of the alleged gross income of the American People, created as a function of all of their labors and work, as a direct tax without apportionment, under alleged authority conferred under the 16th Amendment to tax “… income, from whatever source derived, without apportionment, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

FACT: The 16th Amendment has no enabling enforcement clause in it, that would constitutionally authorizes the U.S. Congress to write any law to enforce any power alleged newly created or authorized under authority of the Amendment alone.

FACT: There are Amendments to the Constitution, both before and after the 16th Amendment, that do have and clearly contain an enabling enforcement clause within them, irrefutably proving the absence within the Amendment, of such alleged grant of any new enforceable power, is intentional.

FACT: In assessing the legal effect of the 16th Amendment, the Supreme Court plainly said in 1916 that “the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation“. “. . . The provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged . . .”
Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103, 112-13 (1916)

FACT: The Article I, Section 8, clause 1, authorities to tax only indirectly, by uniform impost, duty and excise, do not reach the labors of the American people with legal effect. This is why the federal government has argued for sixty years that the 16th Amendment was the sole basis for the enforcement of the income tax imposed by Section 1 of Title 26 United States Code (Title 26 is also called the I.R.C.). In speaking of the power to tax by ‘duties,’ ‘imposts,’ and ‘excises,’ the Supreme Court has consistently said:

” ‘We think that they were used comprehensively, to cover customs and excise duties imposed on importation, consumption, manufacture, and sale of certain commodities, privileges, particular business transactions, vocations, occupations, and the like.’ Duties and imposts are terms commonly applied to levies made by governments on the importation or exportation of commodities. Excises are ‘taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale, or consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges.‘ Cooley, Const. Lim. 7th ed. 680. The tax under consideration, as we have construed the statute, may be described as an excise upon the particular privilege of doing business in a corporate capacity, i. e., with the advantages which arise from corporate or quasi corporate organization; or, when applied to insurance companies, for doing the business of such companies. As was said in the Thomas Case, 192 U. S. supra, the requirement to pay such taxes involves the exercise of privileges, and the element of absolute and unavoidable demand is lacking. If business is not done in the manner described in the statute, no tax is payable.

If we are correct in holding that this is an excise tax, there is nothing in the Constitution requiring such taxes to be apportioned according to populationPacific Ins. Co. v. Soule, 7 Wall. 433, 19 L. ed. 95; Springer v. United States, 102 U.S. 586 , 26 L. ed. 253; Spreckels Sugar Ref. Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 397 , 48 L. ed. 496, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 376.“ Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. , 220 US 107, 151-152 (1911)” Thomas v. United States, 192 U.S. 363 , 48 L. ed. 481, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 305 “Excises are “taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale or consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges the requirement to pay such taxes involves the exercise of the privilege and if business is not done in the manner described no tax is payable…it is the privilege which is the subject of the tax and not the mere buying, selling or handling of goods. ” Cooley, Const. Lim., 7th ed., 680.” Flint, supra, at 151; Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911)1

Which is mirrored in Black’s Law Dictionary: “Excise taxes are taxes “laid upon the manufacture, sale or consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges.” Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107, 31 S.Ct. 342, 349 (1911); or a tax on privileges, syn. “privilege tax”. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition

“The subject matter of taxation open to the power of the Congress is as comprehensive as that open to the power of the states, though the method of apportionment may at times be different. “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises.” Art. 1, § 8. If the tax is a direct one, it shall be apportioned according to the census or enumeration. If it is a duty, impost, or excise, it shall be uniform throughout the United States. Together, these classes include every form of tax appropriate to sovereignty. Cf. Burnet v. Brooks, 288 U. S. 378, 288 U. S. 403, 288 U. S. 405; Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co., 240 U. S. 1 , 240 U. S. 12.” Steward Mach. Co. v. Collector, 301 U.S. 548 (1937), at 581

“The [income] tax being an excise, its imposition must conform to the canon of uniformity. There has been no departure from this requirement. According to the settled doctrine the uniformity exacted is geographical, not intrinsic. Knowlton v. Moore, supra, p. 178 U. S. 83; Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., supra, p. 220 U. S. 158; Billings v. United States, 232 U. S. 261, 232 U. S. 282; Stellwagen v. Clum, 245 U. S. 605, 245 U. S. 613; LaBelle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. 377, 256 U. S. 392; Poe v. Seaborn, 282 U. S. 101, 282 U. S. 117; Wright v. Vinton Branch Mountain Trust Bank, 300 U. S. 440.” Steward Mach. Co. v. Collector, 301 U.S. 548 (1937), at 583 “Whether the tax is to be classified as an “excise” is in truth not of critical importance. If not that, it is an “impost” (Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 158 U. S. 601, 158 U. S. 622, 158 U. S. 625; Pacific Insurance Co. v. Soble, 7 Wall. 433, 74 U. S. 445), or a “duty” (Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 8 Wall. 533, 75 U. S.  546, 75 U. S. 547; Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 157 U. S. 429, 157 U.
S. 570; Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U. S. 41, 178 U. S. 46). A capitation or other direct” tax it certainly is not.Steward Mach. Co. v. Collector, 301 U.S. 548 (1937), at 581-2

1 Again, Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. is controlling and Constitutional law, having been cited and followed over 600 times by virtually every court as the authoritative definition of the scope of excise taxing power.

So, the granted taxing powers are conclusively defined within the U.S. Constitution: “Mr. Chief Justice Chase in The License Tax Cases, 5 Wall. 462, 72 U. S. 471, when he said: “It is true that the power of Congress to tax is a very extensive power. It is given in the Constitution, with only one exception and only two qualifications. Congress cannot tax exports, and it must impose direct taxes by the rule of apportionment, and indirect taxes by the rule of uniformity.

Thus limited, and thus only it reaches every subject, and may be exercised at discretion.” And although there have been from time to time intimations that there might be some tax which was not a direct tax nor included under the words “duties, imposts and excises,” such a tax, for more than one hundred years of national existence, has as yet remained undiscovered, notwithstanding the stress of particular circumstances [that] has invited thorough investigation into sources of revenue.” And with respect to the power to tax income the Supreme Court has said:

“The act now under consideration does not impose direct taxation upon property solely because of its ownership, but the tax is within the class which Congress is authorized to lay and collect under article 1, [section] 8, clause 1 of the Constitution, and described generally as taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, upon which the limitation is that they shall be uniform throughout the United States. Within the category of indirect taxation, as we shall have further occasion to show, is embraced a tax upon business done in a corporate capacity, which is the subject-matter of the [income] tax imposed in the act under consideration. The Pollock Case construed the tax there levied as direct, because it was imposed upon property simply because of its ownership. In the present case the tax is not payable unless there be a carrying on or doing of business in the designated capacity, and this is made the occasion for the tax, measured by the standard prescribed. The difference between the acts is not merely nominal, but rests upon substantial differences between the mere ownership of property and the actual doing of business in a certain way.” Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. , 220 US 107, 150 (1911) Which is repeatedly supported: “As has been repeatedly remarked, the corporation tax act of 1909 was not intended to be and is not, in any proper sense, an income tax law. This court had decided in the Pollock Case that the income tax law of 1894 amounted in effect to a direct tax upon property, and was invalid because not apportioned according to populations, as prescribed by the Constitution. The act of 1909 avoided this difficulty by imposing not an income tax, but an excise tax upon the conduct of business in a corporate capacity, measuring, however, the amount of tax by the income of the corporation, with certain qualifications prescribed by the act itself.  Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107 , 55 L. ed. 389, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 342, Ann.  Cas. 1912 B, 1312; McCoach v. Minehill & S. H. R. Co. 228 U.S. 295 , 57 L. ed. 842, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; United States v. Whitridge (decided at this term, 231 U.S. 144 , 58 L. ed. –, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 24.” Stratton’s, supra at 414 So imposts and duties are taxes on imported and exported goods, i.e. : commodities and articles of commerce that are imported into, and or exported from, the United States of America. Imposts are also taxes on foreign persons” and their activities in the United States (foreign individuals & companies, & organized operations like a foreign trust, charity, etc.). Imposts and duties are also taxes, where imposed, on persons in the U.S. territories and possessions, and on America citizens who are living and working in a foreign country under a tax treaty with the United States that allows the federal taxation of the American persons in that foreign country, under the active tax treaty.

So taxation, by impost and duty, by definition, fundamentally does not reach the labors of the American people conducted in the fifty states, where the labor does not involve any import or export, or other foreign activity. And Excise taxes are now accepted as being constitutionally defined by both law and precedent (over 600 times) as: “taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale or consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges “.

But Title 15 U.S.C. Section 17, plainly and clearly states that: “The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce“. Under the U.S. Constitution this law removes the (domestic) labor of a human being (American citizens)” from subjectivity to any and all taxation by excise under Article I, Section 8.

This is of course why the United States’ IRS, DOJ, and the entire federal judiciary (at this point) PREVIOUSLY have had to claim in court for 50 years that – it is the 16th Amendment that authorizes the income tax, and not Article I, Section 8. Thus, under Article I of the Constitution, there is an admitted total lack of subjectivity of the citizens to any and all impost, duty or excise taxation on Labor, i.e.: the indirect taxation of the citizen’s labor, or a tax upon the exercise of his or her Right to Work resulting in the payment of “salary” or “wages“, does not apply to citizens, because it is not statutorily authorized, now made enforceable, as it is fundamentally outside of the legal reach, and scope of legal effect, of all of the granted Constitutional authorities to tax indirectly under authority of Article I, Section 8, clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

The reason why this is so important to understand, is because this basic information, concerning the proper, limited, application and enforcement of the constitutional, and constitutionally granted, powers to tax, is essential in properly and fully understanding the legal issue of the limited subject-matter jurisdiction of the federal courts that exists with respect to the taxation of the individual citizens. A proper and complete understanding of this legal issue, immediately leads to the realization that there is no constitutionally granted subject-matter jurisdiction that can be taken over a civil action to adjudicate and or enforce the claims that are alleged by the United States in any Complaint filed in a legal action that is filed in the federal courts to pursue the enforcement of the payment of a personal income tax against an individual American citizen as defendant. In the United States of America, under the Constitution of the United States of America, our federal courts are courts of only limited, specifically enumerated, constitutionally granted, powers, that only exist as written in the law. The courts cannot enforce ideas, or a philosophy, or custom or habit, or ritual, or beliefs, or even common sense.

The courts can only enforce the written law of the statutes of the Titles of United States Code. Nothing else. And of course, under the Constitution of the United States of America, a statute (law), can only be written by Congress where,

first: – the Constitution grants a specific power to be exercised by the Congress (as is done in Article I, Section 8); and second: the Constitution specifically grants the authority to the Congress to write law (as is done in Article I, Section 8, clause 18), with specific applicability to the enforcement of the power(s) granted, that was, or were, exercised in operational practice (enforcement) by the government (IRS).

So, the three required elements of our constitutional law in America, necessary to establish the subject-matter jurisdiction of the courtthat can be taken over any legal action, sufficient to allow that court to entertain and adjudicate the action in the court, are:

(1) a specific power must be granted by the Constitution or Amendment for Congress (the United States) to exercise;

(2) a specific grant of authority for Congress to write law must be made by the Constitution or Amendment, with respect to the administration and enforcement of the specific power granted in (#1) above 2; and,

(3) a specific statute must be legislatively enacted by an authorized Congress, with specific application to the enforcement of the specific power alleged granted and exercised in (#1) above, and made enforceable with authorized law under (#2) above.

These fundamental elements of constitutional law, controlling the ability of a federal court to lawfully take a granted subject-matter jurisdiction over a legal claim made by complainant (like the United States) in the federal district court, combined with the irrefutable lack of any enabling enforcement clause that exists in the 16th Amendment as adopted, make the United States’ claims in the courts that the 16th Amendment is the foundational authority for the enforcement of the income tax against the individual citizens, on the mere basis of being a “person” with alleged “gross income”, appear dubious at best, and a complete and total lie at worst, as this lack of granted constitutional authority to write law under the 16th Amendment also explains the alleged tax-protestors’ claims of the last 50 years, that – if the tax is under the 16th Amendment, then the tax must be voluntary, as no law is constitutionally authorized to be written by Congress, and therefore no law can exist, or does exist, under the 16th Amendment that effects the income of the citizens directly, without the underlying foundational use of the impost, duty and excise taxing authorities of Article I first being made applicable.

i.e. : a specific enabling enforcement clause of the Constitution, or one of its Amendments, must be shown to have been made applicable to the specific taxing power alleged constitutionally granted, and operationally practiced under (#1) above;

So the lower federal district and circuit courts have over time, seditiously reversed the Supreme Court’s original and true holding in 1916 – that the income tax is authorized and is constitutional under the granted and enforceable indirect Article I taxing authorities, as a measure of the amount of the indirect tax that is imposed on the income derived from the impost, duty or excise taxable activities or persons,

– who are made subject by the tax law to the payment of the uniform impost, duty or excise;

– which does not constitute an unconstitutionally unapportioned direct tax. The Supreme Court plainly held in 1916, in the Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR Co., 240 US 1 (1916) and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916) cases, that the income tax is an indirect tax under Article I, and is not a direct tax under the 16th Amendment.

Again: “. . . The provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged .

Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103, 112-13 (1916) “It is clear on the face of this text that it does not purport to confer power to levy income taxes in a generic sense – an authority already possessed [under Article I, Section 8] and never questioned – or to limit and distinguish between one kind of income taxes and another, but that the whole purpose of the Amendment was to relieve all income taxes when imposed from apportionment from a consideration of the source whence the income was derived.” Brushaber, supra, at 17-8 “The various propositions are so intermingled as to cause it to be difficult to classify them. We are of opinion, however, that the confusion is not inherent, but rather arises from the conclusion that the Sixteenth Amendment provides for a hitherto unknown power of taxation, that is, a power to levy an income tax which although direct should not be subject to the regulation of apportionment applicable to all other direct taxes.

And the far-reaching effect of this erroneous assumption will be made clear by generalizing the many contentions advanced in argument to support it, . . .” Brushaber, supra, at 10-11 “…it clearly results that the [direct tax] proposition and the contentions under it, if acceded to, would cause one provision of the Constitution to destroy another; that is, they would result in bringing the provisions of the Amendment exempting a direct tax from apportionment into irreconcilable conflict with the general requirement that all direct taxes be apportioned. … This result … would create radical and destructive changes in our constitutional system and multiply confusion.” Brushaber v. Union Pac. R.R., 240 U.S. 1, 12

“The Sixteenth Amendment, although referred to in argument, has no real bearing and may be put out of view. As pointed out in recent decisions, it does not extend the taxing power to new or excepted subjects, but merely removes all occasion, which otherwise might exist, for an apportionment among the States of taxes laid on income, whether it be derived from one source or another. Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, 17-19; Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103, 112-113.” These holdings in 1916 of course merely reasserted the Court’s long-standing recognition of the constitutional fact that the federal taxation of labor (without apportionment to the states for payment of the direct tax), is not a constitutionally granted taxing power, as labor has historically been perceived by the courts as a constitutionally protected Right, and outside of the granted internal Excise taxation powers.  “As in our intercourse with our fellow-men certain principles of morality are assumed to exist, without which society would be impossible, so certain inherent rights lie at the foundation of all action, and upon a recognition of them alone can free institutions be maintained. These inherent rights have never been more happily expressed than in the Declaration of Independence, that new evangel of liberty to the people: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident’ — that is so plain that their truth is recognized upon their mere statement — ‘that all men are endowed’ — not by edicts of Emperors, or decrees of Parliament, or acts of Congress, but ‘by their Creator with certain inalienable rights’ — that is, rights which cannot be bartered away, or given away, or taken away except in punishment of crime — ‘and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and to secure these’ — not grant them but secure them — ‘governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.’ “Among these inalienable rights, as proclaimed in that great document, is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant the right to pursue any lawful business or vocation,

. . . “It has been well said that, “The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable [right] . . .” Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, Bk. I. Chap. 10.” [in Justice Field’s Concurrence in Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, 756 4 S.Ct. 652 (1884)] Justice Field was not alone in his assessment. He was joined in his concurrence by Justice Bradley, who, joined by JJ. Harlan and Woods, also concurred, but on the basis of Field’s reasoning, stating at p. 762:

“The right to follow any of the common occupations of life is an inalienable right; it was formulated as such under the phrase “pursuit of happiness” in the Declaration of Independence, which commenced with the fundamental proposition that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” This right is a large ingredient in the civil liberty of the citizen.” “Included in the right of personal liberty and the right of private property partaking of a nature of each- is the right to make contracts for the acquisition of property. Chief among such contracts is that of personal employment, by which labor and other services are exchanged for money or other forms of property. If this right be struck down or arbitrarily interfered with, there is a substantial impairment of liberty in the long established constitutional sense.” Justice Pitney in Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1, 14, 59 L.Ed. 441, L.R.A. 1915C, 960, 35 S.Ct.Rep. 240 (1915) “But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth ‘may be a government of laws and not of men.’ For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886) But the lower federal district and circuit courts have reversed this clear indirect “income tax” holding that was made by the Supreme Court in 1916, by invoking as controlling, not these true, controlling Supreme Court cases cited above (Brushaber & Stanton), but instead they invoke one of their own contradictory inferior opinions from the below list of inferior circuit court decisions that openly simply declare, erroneously (and obviously so), that the federal personal income tax is authorized by the 16th Amendment as a direct unapportioned tax that is laid on all of the income of all persons.

  • United States v. Collins, 920 F.2d 619, 629 (10th Cir. 1990), (which simply asserts the tax is direct and unapportioned, reversing Brushaber without actually citing or quoting any text from that case opinion);
  • Parker v. Comm’r, 724 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1984). (which also asserts the tax is direct and unapportioned, reversing Brushaber without citing or quoting any actual text from the case opinion);
  • Lovell v. United States, 755 F.2d 517 (7th Cir. 1984), 11 The Broken Tax System www.Tax-Freedom.com (which simply cites to Parker v. Comm’r. to make its assertions);
  • United States v. Sloan, 755 F.2d 517, 519 (7th Cir. 1984), (which simply cites to Lovell and Collins to make its assertions);
  • In re Becraft, 885 F.2d 547, 548 (9th Cir. 1989), (which simply cites to Lovell and Parker to make its assertions). And so, as a result of the federal courts improperly using for the last 40 years these inferior, isolated, self-circular court decisions (upholding the direct unapportioned taxation of income under the 16th Amendment), actually reversing the Supreme Court’s true holding (upholding only indirect uniform taxation of income under Article I, Section 8), the federal personal income tax has been enforced for 60 years in the lower federal Tax Court and district and circuit courts, erroneously, as a direct unapportioned tax, in blatant violation of the prohibition on such direct taxation that is still constitutionally prohibited by Article I, Section 2, clause 3 and Article I, Section 9, clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution.

Which brings us back to the focus of this exposé, and the beginning of this paper,

– the new tax law H.R. 1 (Dec. 2017), made effective as law as of January 1, 2018. You see in 2011 the United States Congress passed another new law directly affecting the new tax law, requiring that all legislative Bills brought forward to the House floor for debate, contain within them a plain and clear statement identifying and declaring the alleged constitutional clause with the grant of authority that serves as the constitutional foundation to the congressional claim of a granted authority to write law with respect to the administration of the powers claimed therein, and proposed exercised under the new legislation.

So, what did they put in the Constitutional Authority Statement for H.R. 1, the new income tax law now in effect ?  Did they actually write “the 16th Amendment” was the authority, as argued for 50 years, or something else ? NO! It’s either there or it isn’t.

First, it should be noted that the re-enactment of Title 26 U.S.C. (I.R.C.) Section 1, as done in H.R. 1, of course constitutes a re-enactment of exactly the same income taxing powers, and scheme of taxation (or lack thereof), as previously existed under the previous version of the income tax law, i.e. : the 1986 IRC code provisions of Title 26 U.S.C. (IRC) Section 1. Congress has simply adjusted the number of tax-brackets from seven to four, with different earnings thresholds and tax-rates associated with each of the four new tax-brackets, and with a new set of allowed or disallowed deductions and exemptions for everyone.

But, it is basically and essentially, an undeniable reimplementation of exactly the same scheme of graduated, bracketed, gross-income taxation (under IRC § 61) of taxable income (IRC § 63), as that (scheme of taxation) which has existed since 1913.

Supposedly, under this new law, nothing substantial or constitutionally foundational is believed to have been changed concerning or controlling the fundamental taxing power exercised, to tax income, and everything about the scheme is basically left unchanged, schematically identically the same as before (since the recodification of the tax law in 1986, which was also recodified (a new written version was created) in 1939 and 1954).

The “Constitutional Authority Statement” for the new law (26 USC (IRC) Section 1) plainly states: (next page) Lets look at that, closer:

As never before…It now plainly states that the Constitutional Authority for the enactment of the new income tax law enacted under H.R. 1, is not the 16th Amendment at all, but relies solely on “ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 1 of the Constitution of the United States.” for its authority.  If the 16th amendment was intended as the authority, it would have been listed. It is NOT!

Uh-oh! You mean it isn’t the 16th Amendment after all? … and that claim of constitutional authority under the 16th Amendment as legal foundation to sustain the imposition and enforcement of the personal income tax, can never be made by the IRS, or in court by the United States attorneys, again, – ever !! In neither civil, nor criminal, tax prosecutions?  

Finally, the true and correct constitutional authority for the federal personal income tax is plainly and clearly specified in the law, on the Congressional House record, as being established under ONLY Article I, Section 8, clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which contains only the grant of the required constitutional authority to tax, indirectly, by impost, duty and excise, which powers, by law (Title 15 USC Sec. 17) do not lawfully reach the labors or income of the American People with force of law though the proper and lawful invocation and enforcement upon individual persons of only the granted indirect taxing powers.

The new income tax law, H.R. 1, by completely removing the 16th Amendment as an arguable constitutional basis and legal foundation, or as the applicable constitutional authority that is allegeable as the constitutional authority for the imposition, withholding, collection, and enforcement of the personal income tax in the federal courts as a direct tax,

– completely strips the IRS, the DOJ, and the federal judiciary of all of their lawful ability to legally enforce on American citizens after January 1st, 2018, the federal personal income tax in the federal courts as it has been practiced since 1945.

Its’ over. The IRS, the DOJ, the federal judiciary are all eviscerated. The monstrous income tax FRAUD perpetrated by the federal courts on the American People is fully exposed now, naked to the world, and the behavior and opinions of the federal judiciary are exposed as nothing but the treasonous sedition they have always been. i.e. : communistic and not constitutional. Repugnant, disgusting, corrupted, polluted, perverted, ultra vires judicial behavior and opinions, all committed for sixty years outside of the granted constitutional authority that exists for the court to lawfully act under, is all exposed. Naked to the world.

The Emperor wears no clothes. This new constitutional clarification now proves it has all been conspiratorial judicial theft. Nothing more, and nothing less. The judicial crimes of the last sixty years, fraudulently perpetrated on the American People by the federal judiciary in the name of tax has all been pure unlawful and wrongful conversion of the constitutionally protected private property of We the People, under color of law, under color of office, and in the name of tax only;

– for there is no law because none is authorized, and there is no enforceable direct tax or taxing power conferred under the 16th Amendment as previously used and deceptively claimed, because no such power is constitutionally made enforceable against the individual ‘person’, as opposed to one of the “several states”.

Article 1, Section 2, clause 3 – “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned amongst the several states which may be included within this Union”

All American citizens, in all 50 states, are all now EXEMPT – as they always were, but is now clarified by constitutional as now clarified by congress), from any required payment or withholding of the federal personal income tax from their paycheck, earned at their place of employment in one of the fifty states, and everyone should therefore now claim EXEMPT on their W-4, as provided in law thereupon, under the supremacy-clause exemption from withholding, that is made at Title 26 USC (IRC) Section 3402(n), for informed employees to claim.

Go ahead, “Google” it, – “H.R. 1 Constitutional Authority Statement”. See for yourself. Without the use of the misapplication of the 16th Amendment to erroneously allege a direct tax on income that is owed by all “persons”, there can be no lawful enforcement of the personal income tax on the income of the American People, by any Department, Agency, Service, or any other group of men that exist within the federal government,

– like the IRS, the DOJ, the federal judiciary, or even the “United States of America” (as a plaintiff in the courts), without there first being the clear applicability of some impost, duty, or excise tax to measure, that lawfully and properly taxes the underlying taxable (business, commodity, or trade based) activity from which the income is derived.

Therefore, if there is no impost, duty, or excise tax that exists in the written law of the United States Code (the written laws) that applies to the underlying taxable activity, resulting in “taxable income”, then there is no amount of gross income” to measure as tax. And, since there is no impost, duty, or excise tax that exists in the written law of the United States Code (the written laws) that reaches either the “wages” or “salary” of the American People, earned by Right, as those terms (“wages” and “salary“) are not included in IRC Section 61 defining the sources of gross income constituting taxable income of an American citizen;

– but the terms are specifically included in IRC Section 1441(b), wherever “wages” or “salary” are earned by the non-resident alien person that is identified in law under IRC Section 1441(a). And, since it is only the foreign person (Follow this LINK and CLICK on Person see the definition – and also look up definition of individual in the code – it’s likely not you), who is made subject under the provisions of IRC Sections 7701(a)(16), to the collection of the federal personal income tax imposed in the code sections of Subtitle A (Chapters 1-6) of Title 26, which is where the original 1913 income tax laws are found in today’s law.

Subtitle A is the body of law that was enacted by Congress in 1913 as the federal personal income tax law, enacted under the original income tax legislation of the Underwood-Simmons Tariff Act of Oct. 3, 1913, then it has now become impossible (under the new H.R. 1 income tax law, ONLY under Article I, Section 8, authorities) for any party or person to lawfully withhold or collect any federal income tax from the payments made to an informed American citizen in one of the fifty states!

Oh, by the way, a Tariff, as enacted within the Underwood-Simmons Tariff Act of Oct. 3, 1913, is one form of an impost, which taxing power, when exercised in the 50 states, is limited in constitutional operation to the taxation of only foreign persons and imported foreign goods, commodities, and other taxable articles of commerce“.  An impost, in the form of an enacted tariff, has no internal application to the domestic activity of American citizens conducted by Right within the fifty states, without any involvement with foreign goods or foreign persons.

So, as I said in the beginning:  The new federal personal income tax law, H.R. 1, that was just enacted into law by Congress in December 2017, and already made effective as of January 1st, 2018, has the immediate legal effect of:

1. Completely disemboweling and destroying the I.R.S.’ current personal income tax collection and enforcement practices and operations, by removing them entirely and completely from all legitimate constitutional authority to act to enforce the direct taxation of income under the 16th Amendment, as practiced for the last 60 years; Exposing 60 years of IRS THEFT & UNLAWFUL CONVERSION BY FRAUD.

2. Strips the federal Department of Justice naked in the courtroom of all of its usual illegitimate constitutional argumentsthat have been made in the courtroom for the last 60 years, to sustain the federal court’s (both district and tax courts’) erroneous enforcement of a direct and unapportioned tax upon the income of We the American People under alleged authority of the 16th Amendment (Exposing 60 years of DOJ FRAUD AND/OR STUPIDITY); and

3. Completely exposes the federal judiciary’s unlawful enforcement of the federal personal income tax under the 16th Amendment over the last 60 years of American history, as nothing but a complete and total judicially committed fraud that plainly and clearly can now be seen as the true judicial conspiracy of sedition that it is, to undermine and remove the constitutional limitations placed upon the federal taxing powers, in order to enforce the unconstitutionally directtaxation of the labors and work (“wages” and “salaries“) of the American People, in order to fund, not the legitimate operation of the government, but the constitutionally unauthorized progressive, liberal, Fabian, socialist programs effecting the re-distribution of wealth that are used to create the welfare-class and class warfare systems that are resulting in the destruction of America, Freedom, Liberty, private property, and equal rights, by expanding the judicial authority beyond that which is authorized, to enable the federal judiciary to constitutionally usurp the legislative authority of the Congress, through the judicial enforcement of only the perverted judicial Fabian opinions, in place of the actual written constitutional tax law that exists.

This clearly exposes 60 years of JUDICIAL FRAUD, ERROR, and ARROGANCE. 

Now you also know that not only is this not crazy, it is ALL irrefutably TRUE. Oh yea, by the way, it is the 2nd plank of the Communist Manifesto that calls for the graduated and communistic taxation of a population that is kept divided by the different classes of the population defined in the non-uniform tax law by the creation of the different tax-brackets established therein; with different rates of tax for each bracket as under the communistic system of unconstitutional taxation that we suffer under today (for the last 72 years- since 1945), rather than the system of uniformity in taxation that is constitutionally required of both the authorized direct, and indirect taxation of We the People in America and our activities.  That 2nd Plank of the Communist Manifesto, explicitly states:

A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.”

So, now you know where the income tax enforcement operations of the IRS, the DOJ, and federal judiciary really came from, for the last 60 years, because it isn’t Article I of the Constitution of the United States of America, or the 16th Amendment.

Now our government servants, and especially the federal judiciary, stand condemned by their own ignorance and arrogance, and sedition. By its own congressional admission, now made in the written formal Congressional Record of the United States of America, they are nothing but as guilty as sin itself. And now, there is only one path left by which they may escape to find their way back to justice and righteousness, repent.

COMMENT AND CALL TO ACTION – It’s time to move in on every case pending or case already judged in the past and open the prisons doors for those enslaved under this fraud, by bringing a Mandatory Judicial Notice of this argument into that case or appeal, to prove there was never constitutional jurisdiction for the IRS to bring cases in Tax Court or US District Court citing the 16th amendment, now or in the past. Then after winning these cases or in conjunction with your action to stop those cases, sue for constitutional violations using this new found information and congressional rules as the evidence.

published on You Are Law, on January 18, 2018

Basic content provided by: Thomas Freed (tell him you were sent by TJ at Youarelaw.org)
Tom@IRSzoom.com of –

http://tax-freedom.com

Navigate:

http://wetheonepeople.com/did-congress-trump-provide-the-ultimate-tax-remedy-hidden-in-the-rules/  = this article

http://wetheonepeople.com/new-executive-order-implements-global-magnitsky-human-rights-accountability-act%E2%80%A8provides-for-treasury-sanctions-against-malign-actors-worldwide/

http://wetheonepeople.com/propagandists-liars-need-be-destroy-fake-news-awards/

http://wetheonepeople.com/gop-lawmakers-shocked-by-house-intel-report-alleging-surveillance-abuse/

http://wetheonepeople.com/release-the-memo/ 

~ the people

Also See…

The True History of the Income Tax and IRS —- Again

Anna Von Reitz – ANNOUNCEMENTS –TAKE NOTICE!!!! CALL TO ACTION – SOLUTIONS

Picture

ANNOUNCEMENTS –TAKE NOTICE!!!!
From Anna Von Reitz
As of the first week of October 2017 the Municipal UNITED STATES ceased functioning.
Attempts to replace it with a UN Corp “Regional Government” have thus far been successfully rebuffed and prevented.

That leaves us to deal with the Territorial United States government, which is controlled
by the military and has substantially different rules and procedures than the old Muni
government.

As a result some of the recommendations I have made to people in the past either no
longer apply or require tweaking to make them work in this altered scenario.

Those who got their paperwork done and in before October 2017 are grandfathered in
and have their records established via the old Muni process.

They have to be recognized as civilians.
Those who didn’t do this have to follow a different process which has yet to be negotiated
to the same ends– correction of the public record, reclaiming ownership of your
Name/NAMES, and recognition of your civilian status with respect to the military
government.

The criminals in charge have made a great hash of things.
It will require a lot of effort to correct and some confusion is unavoidable.

Just remember the key points — you are no kind of “citizen” but are a civilian non-combatant “national”.

Make use of all means to establish public claim of your Names/NAMES as of your actual
birthday.

This can be accomplished by publication in newspapers, sealed registered mail
record copies, Certificates of Assumed Names, formal name changes followed by
Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-Conveyance of Deed and Title to the land and soil
of your birth state recorded with the local Land Recording Office.

A Corrected Deed to your Name and Estate –land, etc., can be used to the same effect.
Whatever means and route you use to claim back your Name and Estate, it will be
necessary to begin carrying copies of paperwork with you, ready to produce as part of
your identification process.


URGENT NOTE FROM ANNA:
The most urgent thing people need to do besides cleaning up their own political status records is organize their county and state jural assemblies. The national level quorum is growing and will soon be able to redress grievances at a national level.

HOW TO FIND PEOPLE IN YOUR AREA

The National Assembly Thursday night conference call is at nine o’clock p.m., EST, 1-712-770-4160, access code 226823#. First hour is assembly roll call and business. The second hour is general chat and education.

For those who have not participated in your county and state assembly but want to participate please send an email to contentmanager1@yahoo.com with your state in the subject line. You will be connected with your state coordinator.

The national assembly has a full website and forums packed with history and information. You are welcome to register and participate.

National Assembly Website: https://national-assembly.net/
National Assembly Forums: http://forums.national-assembly.net/
DeFacto to DeJure handbook: http://national-assembly.net/index.php/handbook

The old website 1stmichiganassembly.net and the hotline phone number are now obsolete and no longer used. The Michigan General Jural Assembly created and supported the national level assembly website and conference call for the people to return to self governing.

Mr. Trump is doing the best he can with a bad situation.
Our country as a whole is indeed facing an emergency of sorts.

Now more than ever it is
imperative that those born in this country claim their names and their natural political
status and organize their county jural assemblies.
There is not a moment to waste.

Your destiny and the destiny of your country depends on your willingness to set the records straight and organize the local county government you are owed.

Assistance is available from the Michigan General Jural Assembly.
In addition, given the history and the current state of affairs, it seems only prudent for
people to make the effort to set aside emergency stocks of food, fuel, water and yes,
some silver coinage.

I am now and will continue to benefit somewhat if you decide to make use of the Mint
Builder opportunity offered by Paul to acquire some silver, but the real benefit may be to
you and to your families to get serious about a moderate amount of preparation for
possible disruptions.

At present there is no better or other option on the table than to fall back to using gold for
international transactions and silver for domestic purchases.

I am hopeful that we will get through the woods and be able to ultimately outgrow our
belief in money and be able to transition to a more enlightened system of value soon but,
until then, a transition via the old gold and silver standard is in my opinion likely to
happen.
annavonreitz.com/takenotice.pdf
—————————-
See this article and over 800 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website

HOW TO CORRECT YOUR POLITICAL STATUS AND WHY

418JV2zUt0L._SX311_BO1,204,203,200_
Before Things Get Out of Hand……Judge Anna von Reitz –
http://annavonreitz.com/beforethingsgetoutofhand.pdf
http://www.annavonreitz.com/
Red Alert! Another Bankruptcy Fraud in Progress!
Please Post Notice! http://annavonreitz.com/redalertanotherbankruptcy.pdf

Acceptance of Titles — International Notice

418JV2zUt0L._SX311_BO1,204,203,200_

By Anna Von Reitz
As of October 6, 2018 our Acceptance cured in all venues of International Trade and
Commerce, and as of today, November 6, 2018, we Accept Title and give International
Notice of the Acceptance of Title to the assets held in the names of The United States of
America [Unincorporated] and the member States of The United States of America
[Unincorporated] and to the People of The United States of America [Unincorporated]
and to the charters and to the patents and to the copyrights issued under the Delegated
Authorities of The United States of America [Unincorporated] and of its member States
and of its People.
The United States of America [Unincorporated] accepts the return of the Powers
delegated under the agreements of The Constitution for the united States of America
(1787) and of The Constitution of the United States of America (1789) and of The
Constitution of the United States (1790) and of the sovereign patents upon the
intellectual properties, the rights, the titles, and the interests owed to the American States
and People and to The United States of America [Unincorporated] effective September
9, 1776 and at all times and at all places since that given effective date.
The Fiduciary
Anna Maria Riezinger
The United States of America [Unincorporated]
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

http://www.annavonreitz.com/

Common Law ID Card — sovereigntyinternational

The ONLY way you can keep the Code Enforcers at bay is to quit giving them their identification for government employees. There are 2 sources of common law identification cards that I know of. This video explains about the NSEA.US identification card. I will be doing another video about the other ID card mentioned soon.

https://youtu.be/mvikCYw0H28

If you want to keep the satanist order followers from fabricating evidence of their US citizen slave you are going to have to make or get a common law identification card. For NSEA ID cards go to; http://nsea.us/credentials and download the zip file and unzip and follow the numbered files follow me on steamit.com @sovereigntyintl and don’t forget to vote on the articles and make comments Support the channel, consider watching one 30 second ad and clicking to find out more. follow me on Twitter @engineerwin http://www.sovereigntyinternational.fyi

http://sovereigntyinternational.wordp

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/A

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!for… Email – engineerwin@yahoo.com For information on how you can obtain a copy of all of my youtube videos in *.mp4 format, as well as a DVD with over 50 searcheable law dictionaries, and other books and forms, contact me privately.

Youtube profile – sovereignliving

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCokS

Common Law your ONLY real Remedy playlist https://goo.gl/0IwzmY

Do It Yourself playlist https://goo.gl/iB4VHe

The War on Terror is a Fraud playlist https://goo.gl/T4uGIX

Peace Officers vs PIGs Playlist https://goo.gl/K94MC3

Bankster Thieves Playlist https://goo.gl/YQ15pi

BAR Members and their Satanic Connections https://goo.gl/wGs6LH

Do You Know Who You Are playlist https://goo.gl/B4ZMyR Fire and United Nations

Judicial Whores Playlist https://goo.gl/eB1sn4

CIA Operated Media https://goo.gl/TbpXM4

Canada Border PIGs https://goo.gl/j6azWp

US Border PIGs https://goo.gl/FQYZgy

 

via Common Law ID Card — sovereigntyinternational

One World Communist Governance Via Public Private Partnerships — OUR GREATER DESTINY

UN and World Trade Globalization By Canadian Peoples Union Oct 25.18 I want to speak to you today because people are being conned. They’re believing ridiculous things and it’s time to explain exactly what the International Democrat Union is, who founded it and why they founded it, because by the looks of things we’re losing […]

via One World Communist Governance Via Public Private Partnerships — OUR GREATER DESTINY

The Government That Isn’t, Or, Stop Being Stupid Part 29

418JV2zUt0L._SX311_BO1,204,203,200_
By Anna Von Reitz
What we call “the federal government” isn’t a government. It is not and it never has
been. It is a governmental services corporation, which is a different matter entirely.
Please take this outrageous but true statement into your mind and let it rattle
around a bit. Savor the fact. Consider the consequences.
The so-called “United States Government” is not a sovereign government of any
kind. It is at best an association of sovereign states entered into a mutual services
contract with the United States (Trading Company) and its Successors by default.
From the very beginning, the states have been the sovereign units of government.
Any power of the “federal government” has been delegated to it by the states, not
the other way around.
Nineteen very important powers including production of our money, control of our
commerce and trade policies, control of our armed forces (except the militia) and
control of our foreign policy were delegated to the British Monarch and the United
States (Trading Company) in a quid pro quo in which the British Monarch agreed to
act as our Trustee and protector on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways
in exchange for these concessions.
That agreement was initially brokered and conceptualized as The Definitive Treaty of
Peace, Paris, 1783, and particularized as The Constitution for the united States of
America several years later.
So from the start, there was the “united States of America”— an association of
states subscribing to the service to be provided by the United States (Trading
Company) and there was the British Servicer doing business as the United States.
This has been the cause of a great deal of mostly deliberate confusion.
When the states “assembled” in “Congress” it meant that they elected fiduciary
deputies accountable to the states —- people known as “Senators” and
“Congressmen” — and sent them to a meeting called a “Congress” of the states to
discuss and decide matters of mutual interest and establish a body of law applicable
in all states known as the “United States Statutes at Large”.
Things went along well enough for several decades, but the British Monarch and the
Pope conspired in secret Breach of Trust to undermine the American Government via
the Treaty of Verona (1822).
What then commenced can only be called a gigantic fraud scheme.
The Constitution agreed to by the states has always prohibited anyone holding a
foreign title of nobility from holding public elected office in the government at any
level. In 1819, this provision was strengthened and ratified by the states as the
Titles of Nobility Amendment. As a result no member of the Bar Association bearing
the title “Esquire” could serve in the American government in any public elected
office.
When Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Member, was elected President of the United States in
1860, he was not eligible to serve as President of the United States of America —
the association of sovereign states participating in the Congress.
Do you see the trick now?
It was then and is now permitted for members of the Bar to hold any private
corporate office, even elected corporate offices, of the United States (Trading
Company) or any other such governmental services corporation that followed.
They were only prohibited from holding public elected office in our government.
Lincoln used his private corporate office, President of the United States, to overthrow
the public elected government of the United States of America, and he did it by fraud
and similar names deceits.
The so-called “federal government” has operated under conditions of Breach of Trust,
fraud, deceit, non-disclosure, and inland piracy ever since, shamelessly substituting
its private corporate offices for the public offices we are owed.
Each President since Lincoln has functioned as “President of the United States” and
the vast majority of them have been Bar Members ineligible to function as “President
of the United States of America” even if they had been properly elected and
empowered.
As a result of this egregious and carefully concealed fraud upon the American people,
there has been no lawfully elected government since 1860—- merely what appears
to be one. Even the great conflict giving rise to this circumstance has been
misrepresented as “The American Civil War” when in fact no such “war” can be
shown to exist: there was never a valid declaration of war and never a peace treaty
ending it. It is simply an illegal mercenary conflict that the perpetrators of all this
rot have kept simmering on our shores for 150 years.
Lincoln, like Barack Obama, was a British Crown agent and an attorney who did not
meet the requirements to be President of the united States of America, nor even
President of the United States of America—-but who was eligible to serve as
President of the United States, and in that foreign, private, corporate office— they
have wrecked havoc and misery upon the innocent American people.
It is well past the hour in which we must wake up and realize that our supposed
friends and allies have been closer to fiends and allegories. The so-called “federal
government” is merely a storefront for competing international banking cartels.
The so-called FEDERAL RESERVE cartel claims to have purchased the name and
copyrights and trademarks to THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the IMF cartel
claims the same about THE UNITED STATES. They are both commercial crime
syndicates that deserve nothing but a prompt liquidation of assets and claims and
the return of all property to their Priority Creditors, the American states and people.
It’s time that we all rose up with one voice and accused the Roman Pontiff and the
British Monarch of the crimes of their predecessors and addressed the Gross Breach
of Trust that their predecessors have been guilty of and the equally Gross Fraud that
has been practiced against us, together with the crimes of identity theft, press-
ganging, inland piracy, unlawful conversion of assets, enslavement and kidnapping
that have been the daily fare of their regimes for the past 150 years.
The good names of the States of America and United States of America belong to us
as the lawful heirs and Holders in Due Course without respect to any claims made by
the banks of the FEDERAL RESERVE. THE UNITED STATES deserves nothing but a
swift kick to the curb.
All these fraudulent claims and operations must be exposed and these conditions
must be completely reformed. We must work hard to fully restore our lawful
government on the land, call together our jural assemblies to operate our actual
counties and states, and regain our senses.
For a hundred and fifty years Americans have been asleep at the wheel, being
deliberately misled to believe that a governmental services corporation is the same
thing as their own lawful government. That gullibility has cost us millions of lives,
trillions of dollars, and sullied our name throughout the world as we have been
blamed for the lawlessness, treachery, bigotry, and immorality of the pirates that
have claimed to represent us and done terrible and oppressive things in our names.
The Bad News is that we have been clueless and trusting enough to allow this. The
Good News is that we don’t have to allow it anymore.
If you love your country and value your lives, it is time to sit —hard— on the
Archbishops and Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church worldwide. Make them all
fully aware of the absolutely immoral and duplicitous actions of generations of Popes
with regard to this country—-Popes who have waved olive branches and preached
love out of one side of their mouths and then, as the Roman Pontiffs, have secretly
pursued war and profit and committed all manner of crimes under cover of the
Church’s skirts.
If FRANCISCUS thinks he is going to continue these practices unobserved, let’s give
him a good salvo and inform him that no, he is not. Let him know that the entire
world is watching and that the Church is not going to be able to play duplicitous
games in Breach of Trust without paying the full and awful price for its hypocrisy and
criminality and double-mindedness. It is, indeed, time for confession and the
making of amends, and if not, it is time for the Roman Cult to be recognized as a
Satanic festering cancerous sore in the Body of the Church— a disease that needs to
be eradicated both from within and without, or it will most certainly kill its host.
The same basic message needs to be carried to the Lords of the Admiralty, the Lord
Mayor of London, and the British Monarch.
They have not escaped detection. Their hideous mismanagement of their American concession in Washington, DC, has been duly noted by the Americans as well as the rest of the world—which places them squarely between a rock and a very hard place. All these years that they have been wheedling and cheating and dealing in fraud and pretending to “represent” us —they
have misused and abused American Servicemen and women who now know the truth
of the matter—-that they have been slaughtered and become unwitting murderers
in wars for profit, lied to, and then left abandoned as human flotsam, without jobs,
without health care, without educations, without a future.
Our veterans have little to lose and good reason to hate everything that the
Admiralty, the Lord Mayor, the Queen, and the Bar Associations have stood for.
The rest of the world that has suffered — seemingly at the hands of the Americans
—now knows who the actual culprits are.
And it is high time that we told the Federales where to get off our soil and our backs.
—————————————
See this article and over 400 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.