How banksters and lawyers are stealing homes from Americans — Patriots for Truth

Douglas Gabriel interviews two victims of mortgage fraud and explains how the cabal is creating digital records of mortgage deeds in a convoluted lawyer-scheme to steal your home. If you have a mortgage, this is a MUST listen and read. After you listen to the audio, continue your citizen education and read: Exchange Casinos Control […]

via How banksters and lawyers are stealing homes from Americans — Patriots for Truth

Statement of Claim Against Canadian Government Nov 30.18 — OUR GREATER DESTINY

Official Public Record Nov 30, 2018 a Statement of Claim was filed against the Canadian government detailed in 6 pages below. Legal, peaceful, and transparent, the Claim filed by CPU Inc. is subsequent to a Moratorium issued on Nov 16.18 to the Canadian Governor General, Attorney General, and Premiers who chose not to respond. %5B…%5D

via Statement of Claim Against Canadian Government Nov 30.18 — OUR GREATER DESTINY

Regarding the Take Over of BLM Facilities in the Western States

Regarding the Take Over of BLM Facilities in the Western States

NOTICE to All Members of the Press Corps, All Federal Employees, All Members of the American  Armed Forces, All Sheriffs, United States Marshals, and Others Responsible for Public Safety and Peacekeeping

Issued by Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

January 3, 2016

Although it may come as a surprise to many Americans we have been mischaracterized and misidentified as British Crown Subjects for the better part of a hundred years.  This travesty has never been corrected; instead, the British Crown, a commercial investment organization, has kidnapped and press-ganged American land assets into the international jurisdiction of the sea and has pillaged our labor and our resources without mercy in criminal conspiracy and contempt of our Constitution.   They have been aided and abetted in this activity by members of the American Bar Association and the Internal Revenue Service acting as licensed privateers.

These vipers nurtured in our bosom pretending to be our “Friends” and our “Allies” and even our “Trustees” have practiced identity theft against the American people, have involved us in their own private bankruptcies as sureties obligated to pay their debts; they have pretended that because of their fraud against us, we have “abandoned” our property including our land patents, our bank accounts, and our organic states. They have usurped against our lawful government, enslaved our people, and acted as criminals in our midst.

The corporations responsible for this behavior are no different and no better than Walmart or Sears or Burger King; they have used names like “Bureau of Land Management” or “United States Department of Agriculture” and so on under color of law.

The “Bureau of Land Management” is not an actual unit of the American government.  It is a foreign corporation whose only business here is to provide us with “essential governmental services”.


18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law — Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People! 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law US Code Notes prev | next Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected […]

via 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law — Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People!

Hold the Presses! This is Incredible 1.0

By Anna Von Reitz

I have a statement on my desk attributed to former Democratic Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa.  He retired in 2015 after twenty years service in the U.S. Congress, ten years in the House, ten years in the Senate.  So he should know what he is talking about, right?
He is still alive so far as I can discover, so maybe someone in Iowa can track him down and ask if he actually said the things that have been reported to me and ask him to make additional comment, because what I am about to discuss is nothing less than astounding.
According to these statements sitting here on my desk this morning, Senator Harkin believes the following quotes.  My explanatory notes and answers appear in brackets [ ]:
1. Senator Harkin:  [The Internal Revenue Code] “or any other constitutional or federal provision [is/are  null and void because] “those authorities fell with the loss of our national money standard in 1933.”  —-that is, because the (Territorial) United States went off the gold standard.
[Obviously not, Senator, because the Municipal United States continued to function and the Internal Revenue Service continued to click along. Changing from the gold standard to the silver standard in commerce in 1933 could not possibly have any such international treaty consequence. Both forms of money, gold and silver, are actual money and they both pay debts which the American States and People continued to pay for stipulated services under conditions of contract assumption.
Federal Codes established by the old service corporation may have been vacated, but if so, the members of the U.S. Congress failed to serve Public Notice of those facts, and continued to publish and use those same Federal Codes— which means that just as the American  People were “assumed” to bind themselves to the new service providers by process of assumption, the U.S. Congress is “assumed” to bind themselves to the provisions of the Federal Code they have published and used as a basis for suing people in courts all over this country.  Anything less results in institutionalized constructive fraud on the part of the members of the U.S. Congress in 1933 and every year since then.]
2.  Senator Harkin: “Since 1933, the people have formed a new unincorporated United States in trust by their silence in accepting the loss of their ability for paying their debts at law.”
[We must immediately ask — “Which ‘people’?  The actual living people of this country, or the invisible fictional “persons” of the Territorial United States?  Because the States and People who actually own this country continued to pay their debts all along and have no reason to believe in the existence of any unwritten or implied “United States” trust.
The bankruptcy in 1933 ruptured the assumed service contract with
“United States of America, Incorporated” and ultimately led to the demise of that corporation in 1999, but so what?  If a subcontractor goes bankrupt the only affect on the Principal is to hire new subcontractors or extend additional duties to already existing subcontractors — which in this case meant, historically, the UNITED STATES, INC. taking over.
 Also, there is no such thing as a totally “unincorporated” trust.  Trusts may be corporate or incorporated, but they have to have substance and form and a written indenture in order to exist.   There are no Zombie Apocalypse States or States of States or Commonwealths in our country or anywhere else.
Senator Harkin’s belief —-if indeed he said all this — that some kind of un-stipulated public trust exists then or now is straight out of the realm of fantasy and has no basis in law or fact.
There are unincorporated state trusts, but they are not some airy-fairy merely “presumed to exist” construct.  Our unincorporated state trusts are formed by declarations, not constitutions.  Those declarations may take different forms — they may be compacts, they may be sovereign letters patent, they may be commonwealth treatises — but they all have definite written hold-in-your-hand provisions that include public trust indentures.  All of them.
Stop a moment and think about what this purported statement by Senator Harkin implies — the members of the U.S. Congress think that our States don’t really exist or have substance, because they are not incorporated?  That’s like denying the existence of chickens because you broke an egg. Our States are the authorities that charter all their States of States and if the members of the U.S. Congress missed that fact in Grammar School, we are all in a heap of trouble.  You cannot ever have a “State of Florida” without first having a “Florida” — does everyone grasp that fact?]
3. Senator Harkin then quotes Russell v. Allen, 107 U.S. 163, 27 L.Ed. 397: “The United States Government may be the trustee of a charitable trust.”
[Well, I “may” act as a fan dancer, too, Senator.  But in the absence of evidence, we cannot presume that I occupied that capacity, can we? Or any other “potential” capacity — dog catcher, soothsayer, or rocket scientist.  I might act as the trustee of a charitable trust, too. Might. Or might not.  This is crazy stuff, right out of Loony-Tunes Central…. The Trust to which the delegated powers return by Operation of Law is and has always been  The United States of America, Unincorporated, which was formed and announced to the public by The Continental Congress, September 9, 1776, and to all the State Trusts functioning under their statehood compacts, letters patent, commonwealth treatises, etc.  If this is not perfectly obvious to the members of the “U.S. Congress” it is still perfectly obvious to the rest of us.]
I literally can’t believe what I just read.  If this two-page statement by Senator Harkin is legitimate, and if this is representative of the level of understanding among members of Congress, our Ship of State has been lost at sea for over a hundred years, captained by pirates and crewed by imbeciles.
And that discussion was just the first paragraph of this statement.  There’s more.  Unfortunately.  But I must stop and draw breath….
Dear Mr. President Trump: there is no need for any vacuous supposition.  The occasion of any service provider going bankrupt results in the delegated powers returning to The United States of America, Unincorporated.  We were not given Notice by the International Trustees that they were unable to make provisions for new service providers (or were incompetent to do so) and in fact, new service providers readily came forward and assumed the service obligations and have been paid for those services since 1868.
You can see that the obligations of contract by assumption swing both ways, and that any failure by the U.S. Congress to recognize this fact (such as their obligation to honor the entire Federal Code so long as they continue to publish and reference it ) results in constructive fraud against the sovereign States and People of this country and is in fact, treason.
On this occasion with the failures of both the corporate Territorial and corporate Municipal service corporations, we have said — “Enough.” and have made public our non-assumption of contract and have also published our acknowledgement and acceptance of the returned Delegated Powers.
It is now your turn to educate the members of Congress about life in the actual world and tell them that there is no implied United States trust charitable or otherwise available for the United States Government to (possibly) administer.  Andrew Jackson sold off the unincorporated United States as a business in 1836 and used the proceeds to pay off all debts owed by The United States of America, Unincorporated.
All variations of “United States” incorporation(s) since that time have been completely foreign operations acting under assumed contracts, both Municipal and Territorial — and aside from being responsible to obey and execute the constitutional agreements they were assuming, never had any authority, business connections, or any other rights, titles, or interests related to this country or its people.
We are now calling for the “Internal Revenue Service” to vacate our shores for lack of valid contract and lack of evidence that any valid Municipal or Territorial PERSONS exist.  We also remind the American Armed Forces that if they want to work for us, they need a new contract.  And as for the “United States” meaning the British Territorial United States and Municipal United States — we are your Priority Creditors, and that is set in cement.
Finally, as for the Office of the “US Attorney General” —that whole mess needs to be straightened out along with dismissal of any claims that Americans “voluntarily” donated their babies as chattel “alien property” — ASAP.  Thank you, very much.
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna’s website here:
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Trial of the Century — Your Opinions, Please?


The Trial of the Century — Your Opinions, Please?

Posted: 09 Nov 2018 04:55 PM PST

By Anna Von Reitz

Is it plausible that the American People just sat on their thumbs for 150 years and willfully, knowingly, never did the work of “reconstructing” the Federal States of States?
Or is it more plausible that self-interested parties never forthrightly explained the situation to the American People, never followed through on their duty to assist the American People, and instead, used the resulting inaction of the American States and People as an excuse to substitute their own foreign organs of government to replace the Federal States of States in fact mandated by the American States and People?
Having been informed that exactly such substitutions have occurred, that is, that Territorial “States of States” and even Municipal “STATES OF STATES” organizations have been substituted for the lawfully and contractually mandated Federal States of States organizations, do you suspect that this violates the original intent and substance of The Constitution for the united States of America, and thereby also violates all contracts and agreements deriving from it—including any form (“form” is being used in the legal sense here) of “The Constitution of the United States of America”?
Would you consider such secretive substitutions of foreign governmental organizations for American organizations to be treason on the part of those members of the “United States” Congress promoting these actions and also a gross Breach of Trust on the part of the British Monarchs and the Popes responsible for acting as our Trustees on the “High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways” and in the Global Jurisdiction of the Air, respectively?
We have noted via reference above that there are two “forms” of constitution called “The Constitution of the United States of America”.  The first, completed in 1789, is a tri-lateral international treaty and trust indenture supporting the execution of a commercial services contract. The second document, published in 1868, which is almost verbatim the same— so as to promote deliberate confusion with the original, is used as Articles of Incorporation for a Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as “The United States of America, Incorporated”.
Would you consider this substitution of Scottish Articles of Incorporation for the actual Territorial United States Constitution to be a deliberate concealment and act of self-interested fraud, both contrary to the international law established by the actual Territorial Constitution and in violation and Breach of the Public Trust established by the original tri-lateral international treaty?
Having seen two such examples of secretive substitution, first the substitution of British Territorial States of States for American States of States, and secondly, the substitution of the Articles of Incorporation of a Scottish Commercial Corporation for the actual Constitution creating the British Territorial United States — would you say that we have ample evidence of  Breach of Trust and purposeful deception amounting to fraud against the American States and People?
Please note that the Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as “The United States of America, Incorporated”, was deliberately and outrageously infringing on the name of our lawful Government in international jurisdiction, The United States of America [Unincorporated], so as to deliberately confuse them and their commercial corporation with us, and our unincorporated Federation of States.  The historical record shows that this deliberately created confusion led to the Scottish corporation accessing our credit and other assets and allowed them to run up debt against our assets as a result. This is clearly nothing but identity theft and credit theft on a national scale, all promoted under the auspices of the United Kingdom.  Do you think that this large scale identity and credit theft should be treated any differently than the small scale thefts that occur when credit card thieves do the same thing?
Continuing on, the Scottish Commercial Corporation declared bankruptcy in 1907 and skated off with a large portion of its ill-gotten loot transferred to (mostly Belgian, French, and Swiss) shell companies prior to the bankruptcy. In this way, it shed its debts, sheltered its gains, and left us holding the bag to pay off their creditors. This was the responsibility of the British Monarch and the Government of Westminster, both of which have had and have exercised and enjoyed treaties of peace and positions of delegated authority dependent on their trust obligations owed to The United States of America and the States of the Union Federation and the American People since the 1780’s.  Should this Scottish Corporation have been granted bankruptcy protection, considering its criminal acts of fraud and misrepresentation?  Should the American States and People have been held accountable for the debts of this Scottish interloper, when they and their lawful Government were Third Party victims of misrepresentation, Breach of Trust, and identity theft?
The Schemers and their international collaborators, the banks, “took title” to the land holdings of the American States and People as “security” for the debts of the bankrupt Scottish Corporation in 1907. We, our grandparents, and parents worked hard and paid off this bogus debt in 1953, when the bankruptcy of the Scottish usurpers was settled.  Instead of returning the title to our land to us, the British Territorial United States Congress voted to roll our land titles into Federal State Trusts under their control and operated for their benefit.
Conveniently, the actual unincorporated Government, The United States of America, and the American States and People, were told none of this. We were all kept in the dark like mushrooms and fed a steady diet of patriotism and red-white-and-blue flim-flam.  In view of these circumstances, should the land titles and Federal State Trusts be dissolved and all right, title, and interest be returned to The United States of America [Unincorporated], the member States, and People of this country?
Meanwhile, in 1925, the Roman Catholic Church and the Office of the Roman Pontiff got into the act and did their own dirty little “business” on our shores. They set up a Delaware Corporation doing business as the “United States of America” Inc.  This is essentially the same con game the Scottish corporation played.  The only difference is the definite article “the”.  The Scottish usurper called itself “The United States of America” and the RC version called itself the “United States of America” and both were phony, unauthorized, and criminal as three dollar bills.
This “religious non-profit” ran up bills against our remaining assets (remember our land had already been seized upon as security for the debts of the Scottish corporation) — our bodies, our life force energy, our private businesses and homes, our copyrights and patents, our labor, everything that you might consider to be your own property.  They played hard and fast and bankrupted “the” United States of America, Inc. in 1933.  And they followed the same play script, of leaving us to pay their bills.
Given these facts in evidence, do you think that any commercial claims against the American States and People which were established by the Scottish look-alike, sound-alike corporation infringing upon the name of our lawful unincorporated government, have any validity then or now?  Do your think that the nearly identical claims in commerce established on the same basis by the Roman Catholic Church operating as “the” United States of America, have any validity then or now?
If Franklin Delano Roosevelt had on the occasion of his First Inaugural Speech stood up in public and said, “I am making you an offer in the commercial sense.  That offer is to take everything you are and everything you own, your Good Name and Estate, as a gift to my [unstated] holy cause.”—-do you have any reason to think that the American People would voluntarily accept and act upon such an offer?
Do you, upon reading FDR’s First Inaugural Speech, derive the above meaning and intent from it?  If not, do you think that it met the Law Standard in effect in 1935, that all laws and public notices had to be written so as to be understood by an average seventh or eighth grader?
After reading the preface and notes of the Trading With the Enemy Act (TWEA) and the Congressional debates underlying each Amendment to the TWEA, do you think that the Congressional Intent was to declare war on the American States and People?
Do you think that it is possible in any sense of the word for the British Territorial United States to declare “war” on its creator and employer, The United States of America [Unincorporated}, its member States of the Union, or the American People, via any possible act of legislation or internal Federal Code, without breaching the Constitution and the Public Trust  — and thereby nullifying every word of such repugnant legislation?
Do you think that when the Territorial United States Congress included the one-sentence long section 50 USC 4307 (d) “Voluntary payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment or delivery by holder not an enemy” was intended to facilitate trafficking in babies and their enslavement via a process of registering their Good Names and Estates as “gifts” made to the usurping British Territorial States of States organizations?
Do you think that trafficking babies born in America into the jurisdiction of the British Territorial United States as if they had been born in the British Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and laying claim to them as British Subjects and subjecting them and their property to the British Commonwealth system and claiming that they were all “voluntarily” gifted by unwed Mothers as “wards of the state”  to the Office of the Alien Property Custodian (later the U.S. Attorney General) is anything but yet another totally unlawful, illegal, Gross Breach of Trust being promulgated by the British Monarch and the Government of Westminster in violation of the Treaties and Commercial Service Contracts (Constitutions) owed to The United States of America, the American States, and the American People?
Do you see any reason in law or fact or sanity, that these false claims and all the mechanisms and agencies including the “Internal Revenue Service” and the licenses issued to the “Uniformed Officers” (doctors and nurses and dentists) attached to them, should not be summarily liquidated?  And the property of the American States and People extracted from the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) managed by the U.S. Attorney General?
These claims are all nothing but self-interested lies and false claims in commerce.  In order to take them seriously, you would have to believe that every woman giving birth in America (including, BTW, the Catholics) is an unwed Mother, and that all these Mothers “voluntarily” gifted their babies to the British Crown and obligated their assets for the benefit of the British Commonwealth.  Do you believe this?  Do you see any reason why everyone on Earth who has been similarly “seized upon” by these fraud artists— and that includes the Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, Germans, Japanese, and nearly every country in between — should not simply stand up and say, “Hell, no, we don’t agree to this bunko.” and walk out the door?  Who but lawless pirates and dishonorable mercenaries and gangsters could ever defend any of this?
All of this criminality has been supported by politicians and by the banks, and unfortunately, by some military commanders working for the “United States”.
Donald J. Trump has been left holding the bag, without any of the actual facts of the situation being made available to him. Of course, the criminals responsible have been unwilling to step forward and admit the depths of the depravity to which they have sunk—stealing and enslaving babies—  but it is all there on the Public Record of several countries, exactly what they have done, and how they have worked this grotesque bunko scheme against the interests of all free men and women everywhere—- and all while singing “Yankee Doodle Dandy” and blaming us, the American States and People for these crimes against humanity. Having seen the longevity of the crimes and the purposeful step-by-step execution of these crimes against humanity, do you have any questions about why these criminals need to be arrested and punished?
In 2014 we finished giving Due Notice and Due Process and issued our Final Judgment and Civil Orders related to these subjects.  In 2015, we re-issued our Sovereign Letters Patent and published them worldwide. In 2015, Barack Hussein Obama bankrupted the Municipal United States Corporations and thereby vacated the Municipal United States Government.  In 2017, via a domino effect, the Territorial United States Government was also bankrupted and vacated.  These organizations had maintained a claim of “successor-ship” by a process of assumption of contract inherited from the Roman Catholic and Scottish usurpers — a process of pirates making claims based on the claims of other pirates going back to 1868.  But now, finally, they have outsmarted themselves.  By vacating the last two remaining federal contracts and doing so at the same time, we have been able to end any further “assumption” of contract and to acknowledge and accept back our formerly delegated powers.
As a result, The United States of America {Unincorporated] stands as it has since September 9, 1776, as the Federation of Sovereign States representing the American States and People in international jurisdiction, and is the only actual Government still standing. Any  further exercise of our once-delegated powers by any commercial corporation on Earth without our written and express consent is unlawful, unacceptable and denied.  Any claim that our persons are now or have ever been subject to the Queen in any relationship apart from those established by the original Constitution of the United States of America is null and void. This has happened by Operation of Law and is the result of the incapacity of the delegates in bankruptcy and also as a result of the corrupt and criminal basis of the former claims to “represent” us and to own us as property in violation of international law, the Geneva Conventions, common decency, and Good Faith.  Do you see any reason why the American States and People should continue to put up with dis-service, incompetence, fraud, false claims in commerce against us and against our assets, and other double-dealing crime on the part of our hirelings?
Most recently, there has been an attempt by hackers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and certain offices of the Department of Defense (DOD) to gin up a “new” computer system based on re-hashing old Binary System Data Processing ideas, calling it the “Quantum Financial System” and seizing upon all the off-ledger Special Deposit Accounts in the world banking system.  They then propose to roll all these assets which in fact belong to other people and which are supposed to be under the control of other Trustees into what they are calling the “Manna World Holding Trust” — which is just another pirate operation based on seizing other people’s assets and calling them yours or, to be more exact, claiming that they are or should be under your control.
About half of all the assets seized in this latest round of criminality belong to Americans.  We have located the rightful owners of about 30% of the remainder. We have also tracked down the actual paperwork and the receipts demonstrating actual ownerships and trusteeships. Our best advice to all those trying to re-establish a world financial system on a basis of theft and lies is to stop.  Just stop right now.  You are only making a bad situation worse. You cannot hope to establish anything good based on more crime.
The world going forward needs a rock solid foundation, not more piles of sand.
And this needs to be done via cooperation and honest dealings among the actual Trustees, not by one micro-chipped female A-1 experiment chosen by a King Rat.
The actual Trustees, as opposed to the Middlemen Bankers and politicians responsible for this ghastly mess, have nothing but Good Will toward the Earth and its peoples. They are agreed that there is more than enough for everyone to do all the many, many things that have to be done to restore Good Faith and Credit, to restore the Earth, to restore rightful Government, and to restore sanity.  Do you see any reason why the people who created and prolonged this mess should be the ones trusted to resolve it?
Do you agree that the actual trustees of the assets that have been dumped into the Manna World Holding Trust should be allowed to do their jobs and the actual wishes of the owners and beneficiaries of these assets should be honored, insofar as they seek to heal and reform and restore and put an end to lawlessness and criminality and oppression of the living people?
We can see no reason to allow these private trust assets to be commandeered by the Hired Help, especially after their performance record over the past 150 years. WDYT?
Mr. Trump must feel like a man surrounded in a Crocodile Pit, not knowing where to turn or who to believe.  We don’t blame him for that.  The fraud and the lies and the identity thefts and forgeries and counterfeits and all the rest of it run deep and run long.  Still, at the end of the day, the Public Records are the Public Records, the Public Laws are still the Public Laws, the actual ownerships of all the assets still are what they are, the treaties and the contracts say what they say.
The American States and People have been victimized by European Sharpies for far too long.  The Flim-Flam has to end, and the actual work of the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People has to begin.  All the debts of the Shysters are not being accepted by us again and we do not propose to validate their theft of private trust assets or Public Trust Assets as a means to pay their debts, either.  Those debts have to be offset and/or forgiven, and the actual Employers, Trustees, and Fiduciaries have to make that possible, because the only other option is more criminality.
All those that agree that more false claims and more extortion and more crime is not the way to go forward, raise your hands……
All those that want their names and their property formally removed from the Alien Property List and extracted out of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) managed by the U.S. Attorney General and returned to them and their States of the Union, raise your hands……
All those who are fed up with lies and criminality from your Employees, raise your hands…..
All those who are fed up with what appear to be public courts acting as private bill collectors for foreign interests, raise your hands….
All those who are fed up with the British Monarchs promoting Commercial Feudalism and seeking to indebt others for their madness, raise your hands….
All those who are owed tons upon tons of services and goods that were provided in Good Faith on the basis of I.O.U’s issued by the various banks, and never received any actual remedy or relief…. raise your hands….
All those living people who were taken in by false advertising of “Home Loans” when the perpetrators were actually proposing that you loan your homes to them for their investment and profit…. raise your hands…..
All those that feel that the Governments and Institutions and Commercial Corporations including banks and churches that have acted in Breach of Trust owed to the American People, the Canadians, the Australians, the Japanese, the Germans, and all other populations that have been subjected and abused by this same brand of legal chicanery —should be (a) held accountable and obligated to reform and makes amends or (b) outlawed and liquidated and no longer allowed to exist….  raise your hands….
All those that feel that seizing upon  private trust assets and converting them into “holdings” of the “Manna World Holding Trust” as a means of paying for public debts, is not a viable or honorable or lawful means to dealing with the situation, raise your hands….
All those who are sick of being kept in the dark and fed horse manure by foreign media cartels jamming up our national airwaves….raise your hands….
All those who have had enough of military officers failing to honor their oaths to defend us against all enemies both foreign and domestic, (please note that— “and domestic”) –raise your hands….
All those who are stunned and amazed that this level of fraud and abuse could go on right under our noses for the better part of two centuries before push came to shove —- raise your hands…..
All those who are determined that this rampant criminality has to stop—raise your hands….and get your own records straight and join your Jural Assemblies and send a donation in support of the position and work of the lawful Government of this country:
I am still acting as Paymaster after all these months.  My PayPal is: and we accept other donations via Snail Mail. Please make checks payable to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.
There’s nobody here but us chickens.  If you want reform and relief and restitution, you have to get busy and organize and demand it.  You have to share this information and take action against the false claims that have been and are being made against you and your country.  And, unfortunately, until we route through all the false claims and interference from our own misguided employees, you have to support with your prayers and your cookie jar money, too.  Thank you, and God bless the men and women of the Jury.
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna’s website here:
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Brother’s Keeper Government

Posted: 09 Nov 2018 11:24 AM PST

By Anna Von Reitz

The way our government is supposed to work, the British inhabitants are supposed to perform nineteen governmental services for us, the free, sovereign, and independent people of this country.
We guarantee their liberty and their democracy. They guarantee our freedom and our republican form of government. It’s supposed to be Even Steven, mutually beneficial, mutually respected. And mutually understood.
They have their Federal Code and State of State Statutes and we have our Public and General Session Laws in each State of the Union.
The entire structure is supposed to work together peaceably and well, and each one, whether acting as a person or as one of the people, is supposed to be secure and untroubled in our respective capacities.
Supposed to be.
But in 1863, the Grand Army of the Republic under Ulysses S. Grant took control, and in the years since then, the successors of the GAR have failed to do their duty by the States and the People, and have sought to undermine, deceive, and pillage the lawful civil government and the people they are hired to serve.
They have colluded with foreign governments to create a state of permanent war and emergency and have not respected the rights of the States and the People who provide not only their payroll, but the bulk of the personnel staffing their military services organizations.
The British Territorial Government and the Roman Municipal Government which have owed us Good Faith have instead usurped upon our lawful and still-standing government in the international jurisdiction, The United States of America [Unincorporated], and our member States.
Worse, in contravention of the Public Law and in disrespect of the guarantees of the respective Constitutions, they have kidnapped Americans via legal chicanery and practiced extortion against them through the United States Mail.
They have pretended that our Mothers voluntarily donated us and our Good Names and Estates to the Territorial franchises operated as “States of States” on our shores, after soliciting undisclosed and unconscionable adhesion contracts of political subjection and enslavement under color of law.
The U.S. Armed Services have been doing exactly the opposite of what we have paid them to do. They have failed to secure our safety and protect our rights and property interests. They have failed to yield to the direction of the actual Civil Government and have pandered to foreign mercenary interests and to foreign service providers— instead.
This is how the tail has managed to wag the dog.
This has been going on for 150 years, with the worst of the abuses accelerating under the boot of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s obscene and deliberately obscured “New Deal”.
Whereupon, we announce and declare and freely establish that we accept all gifts and waive all benefits. We do not wish to hear any more offers to rob, defraud, or enslave us, nor to suffer the ministrations of the false Trustees who have glutted themselves on our produce, our labor, and our lives.
We wish for the release of all Americans from the Alien Property List, and all the attendant fraudulent false claims in commerce that the practices enshrined by the Trading With the Enemy Act impose upon innocent people who have been harmed and preyed upon as Third Parties.
We wish for the return of our assets, and the repatriation of our lawful titles, Good Names, and Estates without further obstruction, obfuscation, excuses, or delay. We wish for the removal of all blocked accounting structures and return of all escrows, rents, leases, mortgages, insurances, copyrights, patents, trademarks, logos, charters and other assets that are ours. We wish for the removal of all encumbrances, odious debts, and the end of all pretenses of emergency, war, or necessity.
It is against our religion to support immorality, thievery, deceit, slavery, pillaging, unjust enrichment, inland piracy, kidnapping, unlawful conversion, fraud, extortion, treason or any other of the egregious crimes that the British Territorial Government and the Roman Municipal Government have tolerated, promoted and engaged in on our shores.
We are each owed the return of all our assets and full return of all right, title, and interest in all of our natural possessions: our land, our lives, our homes, our natural resources, our identities, our intellectual properties, our relationships, our beneficial contracts, our warranties, our guarantees, our restored and lawful government, our insurances and indemnities. We are also owed recovery from the unjust enrichment and profits made from our purloined credit and assets.
This is what we are owed no less than we may be owed from any other debt. This is a commercial affidavit. Not a point of Law.
There are Points of Law to be addressed with the Government of the Philippines, the Government of the Netherlands, the Government of Switzerland, the Government of France, the Government of Scotland, and the Government of the United Kingdom, all of which have sought to benefit themselves and blame us for their own criminality, gross breaches of trust, and failure to take immediate and effective steps to correct their operations with respect to The United States of America [Unincorporated], our States, and our People.
This is internationally published Due Process and Notice to all British Territorial Government and Roman Municipal Government departments, agencies, officials and employees, to all foreign governments, including the Government of the Philippines, and the Municipal Government of Vatican City, also fair and adequate Due Process and Notice to the members of the Territorial United States Congress, to their State of State Governors, to the Municipal United States Congress and to their STATE OF STATE GOVERNORS, to all banks, most especially the Federal Reserve, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the Bank of International Settlements, the British Crown, the Bank of Scotland, the Government of Westminster, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and to the other Governments of the World, including the Spanish Monarchy, the Holy See, and the United Kingdom —- that our lawful Government, The United States of America [Unincorporated[ and our unincorporated sovereign States of the Union, still stand and still make claim upon all the Treaties, commercial contracts, guarantees and assurances, and all material rights, patents, and other assets naturally belonging to us.
There are no unclaimed or abandoned American assets anywhere in the world. Any claim that we have now or have ever “voluntarily” given away our Good Names and Estates is false and self-interested hokum promoted by would-be criminals, and we hereby take exception to it as attempted unlawful conversion, piracy, theft and fraud.
We have not accepted any representation in these matters at all; by our Public Law members of the Bar Associations are precluded and prohibited from occupying any public office or position of trust related to us, our lawful Government, and our assets. This has been plainly stated on the Public Record since 1819.
We remind all parties that all laws and legislation that are repugnant to our Constitution are null and void from inception, including those elements of The Trading With the Enemy Act which would include us in the same category as Enemies and would seek to secretively enslave and subject Americans via unconscionable and undisclosed adhesion contracts solicited under color of law and color of these actions by the British Territorial Congress as being any mandate associated with our lawful government at all.
Finally, we reserve the right and duty to issue our credentials and commission to Federal Marshals known as Continental Marshals, to act as peacekeeping officers serving the international land jurisdiction of this country, to enforce the Public Law, to combat widespread interstate securities and bank fraud, to prevent human trafficking, kidnapping, racketeering, and unlawful arrest and detainment of Private American Nationals, who are in fact internationally Protected Persons.
We rely upon President Donald J. Trump to instruct the American Armed Services and conduct business as a cooperative and mutually beneficial administrative service, for we are inevitably our brother’s keeper, and the welfare of our employees ultimately depends on the welfare and safety of their actual employers.
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna’s website here:
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.






 Business Law & Taxes
By Jean Murray
Updated February 11, 2017To explain an indemnity agreement, it is first necessary to define the term “indemnity.” Indemnity is defined as “a duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another (Black’s Law Dictionary). Indemnity has the general meaning of “hold harmless;” that is, one party holds the other harmless for some loss or damage. Some variations of meaning for therm “indemnity:”

  • Indemnity can also refer to compensation for loss or damage from the actions of another party
  • And indemnity can also be described as a legal exemption from loss or damages, as in the case of an indemnity clause in a contract.

What Type of Business Would Use an Indemnity Agreement?The most common case of a business that has indemnity agreements is in construction. But any business with employees may want those employees to sign an indemnity agreement to protect against employee lawsuits.
Rental car companies also use indemnity agreements to protect against lawsuits from accidents involving rental car drivers.
Indemnity Agreements and Dangerous Activities Businesses that offer somewhat dangerous activities to the public (skiing, para-sailing, amusement park rides) require that the members of the public sign an indemnity agreement releasing the business from liability in case of an accident. In reality, if the business is found to be negligent (faulty equipment, poor maintenance), the individual who was injured still has a claim against the company.
An indemnity agreement (sometimes called a “hold harmless agreement” can be a contract or a section of a contract. In these cases, an indemnity agreement is contract language that indemnifies (holds harmless) one of the parties in a contract for specific actions that might cause damage to the other party.
Examples of Indemnity Agreements

  • A kennel may want an indemnity agreement in a contract with a pet owner to keep the kennel from being sued for damage caused by the owner’s pet to other pets. I this case, the pet owner is being asked to indemnify the kennel owner (to hold the kennel owner harmless) for damages caused by the pet.
  • Indemnity clauses are often found in intellectual property licensing agreements.
  • In another general example, a landlord may require a tenant to sign a “hold harmless” clause in a rental agreement, agreeing that the landlord is not responsible for damages caused by the tenant’s negligence.

In each of these cases and many others, Party A must be persuaded to sign a contract which could cause him or her to be sued. So, Party B is being required to indemnify Party A, so the contract can be signed.
Types of Indemnity Agreements Indemnity agreements are found commonly in construction contracts. In this context, there are several types:

  • Broad form indemnity agreements, ​also called “no fault” agreements, have been common in construction contracts where all loss is placed on the sub-contractors. Many states have declared this type of indemnity agreement to be illegal.
  • Limited indemnity agreements state that the subcontractor pays for all damages caused by the subcontractor’s own negligence. This type of indemnity agreement still places a heavy burden on the subcontractor.
  • Comparative form agreements or clauses are based on the common law principle that negligence is based on actions over which the actor has complete control.

Typical Parts of an Indemnity Agreement The specific form of an indemnity agreement varies by state law. This is a general overview of what you might find in an indemnity agreement.
The two parties will be described:

  • The Indemnitee – the person wanting protection
  • The Indemnifier – the person promising (warranting) to minimize harm to the indemnitee

The agreement may describe consideration (usually a sum of money) that will be used to secure the agreement.
The agreement will state the specific terms under which the indemnitee will be held harmless. This is fairly complicated legal language.
Exclusions to the agreement will be described. One common exclusion is negligence or fault of the indemnitee.
That is, if the indemnitee can be shown to be negligent, the indemnification doesn’t work (the indemnitee is at fault and can be sued).

A claims process will described, including when a claim must be filed and the limits to the claim.
The agreement wills state who has the burden of proof; usually the indemnifier must prove that the claim is not appropriate.

These are the main parts to an indemnification agreement, mostly procedural.


Pay Attention! — If You Want to Save Your Butts!

The Top Ten Articles for Rapid Assistance

The Indemnity Bond and Court Process — Step by Step

Emergency Review About “Money”



By Jean Murray
Updated September 09, 2016 is Indemnity? The principles described in the terms “indemnity” and “indemnify” are interrelated so these terms are defined and explained together.
Indemnity is defined as “a duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” (Black’s Law Dictionary). The term comes from a  late Middle English word meaning “unhurt, free from loss.”
Indemnify and and Indemnification
To indemnify someone is to absolve that person from responsibility for damage or loss arising from a transaction.
(Black’s Law Dictionary).
Indemnification is the act of not being held liable for or being protected from harm, loss, or damages, by shifting the liability to another party.
Indemnity – Variations in Meaning Indemnity also includes an understanding that an injured party has a right to claim reimbursement or compensation for a loss or damage against the person who has the duty. This concept is seen often in civil lawsuits relating to negligence claims.
Indemnity refer in some contexts as compensation for loss or damage from the actions of another party.
Indemnity can also refer to a legal exemption from loss or damages, as in the case of an indemnity clause in a contract, in which one party agrees to take the liability for loss or damage from another party. In this case, indemnity has the general meaning of “hold harmless.”
Indemnity and Hold Harmless Agreements and State Laws
An indemnity agreement is sometimes called a hold harmless agreement, because it is an attempt to make sure that one party does not attempt to sue another party for negligence.At present, 42 states have some kind of state laws that limit the inclusion of indemnity clauses or agreements. While indemnity agreements are a protection against lawsuits, they don’t allow compensation for loss or damage.
Even where these clauses are not restricted, courts have held that indemnity clauses must be expressed in “clear and unequivocal terms” (Maine) or, “very clearly intended” (Nevada).

Indemnity and ContractsIndemnity usually arises in contracts, either as a separate indemnity agreement or as an indemnity clause in a contract. This language is included in cases where there is a possibility of loss or damage to one party during the term of, or arising from the circumstances of, the contract. The right to indemnity and the duty to indemnify ordinarily stem from a contractual agreement, which generally protects against liability, loss, or damage.
Uses of Indemnity Agreements in Business
Indemnity in construction contracts. Indemnity clauses or agreements in construction contracts are an attempt to protect the contractor from lawsuits and losses due to negligence. Some states
Indemnity and Insurance
One of the best examples of indemnity is insurance, which an insurance company indemnifies a property owner from losses or damage to that property. The business owner basically transfers the risk of having to pay for negligence to the insurance company.
In another example, business owners may buy indemnity insurance for professional liability. Allena Tapia, Guide to Freelance Writing, explains how the concept of indemnity insurance can protect freelance writers.
Examples: Here is an example of an indemnity clause in a contract:
“I hereby release, acquit and discharge [company] and its agents and employees from any liability arising from any circumstance including the negligence of [company] or its employees.

Confiscating the customer deposits in Cyprus banks was not a one-off. It could happen here.


Before Things Get Out of Hand……Judge Anna von Reitz –

Click to access beforethingsgetoutofhand.pdf
Red Alert! Another Bankruptcy Fraud in Progress!
Please Post Notice!

Enemy of the Planet Exposed — AIM Truth Bits

New U.S. Mid-Term Elections Needed! MASSIVE PROVEN VOTER FRAUD EXPOSED!! The word is getting out folks. The only folks who may not know that we all know about their massive election rigging in cyber space is Hillary and he globalist gang. The graph and hyperlinked article are from AIM4Truth motherlibertynow. How are you educating and […]

via Enemy of the Planet Exposed — AIM Truth Bits

The Planned Gutting of Industrial America: Who Did It and Why


By John Hoefle
January 1, 2001

Original title: Southern Strategy: Assault on the American Republic published in EIR January 2001

The political success of Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter’s “Southern Strategy,” transforming the White House and Congress into bastions of white Southern power, would have been impossible, without the economic transformation of the United States from the greatest industrial and scientific nation-state in history, to a post-industrial nation of white-collar accountants, real estate brokers, computer programmers, retail clerks, and hamburger-flippers.

This transformation of America, over the past 30-plus years, has been characterized by the collapse of the urban industrial and cultural centers of the North–New York, Detroit, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Cleveland, etc.–and the gradual emergence of the “New South” as the heartland of America’s post-industrial economy.

Today, Southern cities like Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, and even Charlotte, North Carolina dominate the new economy” and house the multinational corporate and banking headquarters that preside over the deregulated looting of every last remaining income stream.

This Houston-Atlanta-Charlotte nexus can be dubbed “Southern Strategy, Inc.” Of course, it was Wall Street–most prominently the financial interests associated with Harriman, Morgan, and Rockefeller–which set this shift in motion. But the deregulated monster represented by such corporate creatures as Enron Corp. in the energy field, the Rainwater interests buying up hospitals, or Corrections Corporation of America in private prison operations, signals as process of financial speculation and physical-economic chaos, which Wall Street can no longer control. With President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard Cheney moving from Texas to Washington, the power of this Southern-based corporate looting apparatus is almost certain to grow at an even more accelerated rate.

We take up one significant slice of that corporate octopus, the Texas-centered network of oil industry giants that have been tied to the political fortunes of the Bush clan for much of the last century.

Behind the Bushes
The role of the Bushes in pushing deregulation, like their role in grabbing control of physical assets, is in the service of something much older and nastier.

Sitting at the center of this web, and typifying the level of corruption, are two Texas-based energy industry giants, each with ties into the nastiest of the Wall Street and European financial oligarchies: Schlumberger and Enron.

By far the older and filthier of the two is Schlumberger, the intelligence apparatus masquerading as an oil services company. Schlumberger is one of the two biggest oilfield services companies in the world, Halliburton being the other. While Schlumberger, the company, was formed in Paris in the early 1900s, the intelligence network which operates through it is much older, a part of the banking empire of the interlocked de Neuflize, Schlumberger, and Mallet-Prevost families, which have been running operations against the United States since the American Revolution. In Houston, the Schlumberger/Lazard nexus is closely allied with a nest of British assets centered around the Harriman interests and operating through a group of powerful law firms. E.H. Harriman was a 19th-Century railroad robber baron whose companies were fronts for the British royal family and their fellow aristocrats. Harriman’s agents in Houston included Baker & Botts, the law firm of former Bush Secretary of State James A. Baker III, which has also represented Schlumberger since the 1950s. The Bush family is also a creature of the Harriman networks and their British controllers, through both the Bush and the Walker sides of the family. Both George H.W. Bush’s father, Prescott Bush, and his uncle Herbert Walker were top officials of the Harriman investment bank, and the Harrimans, Lazard, and Scottish banker James Gammell funded the business and political career of Sir George (Prescott, Herbert, and Sir George were also members of Skull & Bones, the powerful Yale-based secret society). Also coming together in Houston were the British intelligence networks of Col. Edward Mandell House, the global oil cartel, and the “legendary” King Ranch.

Enron, which has an energy trading room in its Houston headquarters which rivals the trading rooms of the big Wall Street investment banks, is perhaps the single company most responsible for the chaos in today’s domestic energy markets. Its “success” in energy speculation has raised virtually every electricity bill, natural gas bill, and heating oil bill in the country, some of them by orders of magnitude,

Enron is a relative newcomer, but plays an important role in allowing the financial sharks, under the guise of deregulation, to get their hands on the income streams generated from the production and consumption of electricity, natural gas, and related energy products. Enron’s fortunes are directly tied to the Bush League: Enron is the single largest contributor to the political campaigns of President George W. Bush, and the firm hired as “consultants” a number of top officials of his father’s administration–including James Baker III, and Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher–after they left Washington. In return, these officials used their political pull to get Enron a series of lucrative contracts around the world. Enron chairman Kenneth Lay has been touted as a potential member of the Bush Cabinet, and Southern Strategy zealot Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) is widely known as “the Congressman from Enron.”

Enron is “Dubya” Bush’s biggest career patron, having given him more than $500,000, according to the Center for Public Integrity.

A Bit of Texas History
When Texas became a Republic in 1836, the political battle revolved around the forces of patriot Sam Houston on the one side, and Mirabeau Buonaparte Lamar on the other. Lamar was a member of the aristocratic, plantation-owning Lamar family of Georgia and New York. Houston was inaugurated as the first President of Texas in October 1836, with his bitter enemy Lamar as his Vice President. Under the Texas Constitution, Houston could not succeed himself in office, and not one, but two of his hand-picked successors died while campaigning for the Presidency, a fortuitous set of circumstances which helped Lamar become the second President of the Republic of Texas, in 1838.

This Texas-Georgia-New York connection is one of the recurring themes in this report, exemplified by the Carter-Menil Foundation of former President Jimmy Carter and Dominique Schlumberger de Menil, and the Houston connections of Atlanta-based Coca Cola. Coke chairman J.P. Austin was the Trilateral Commission member who helped Zbigniew Brzezinski recruit and train Jimmy Carter, to be the President of the Democratic Party’s version of the Southern Strategy. The Lamar tradition also remains strong in Texas: It was in the Lamar Hotel that the Houston elite gathered to play cards and run much of the state, and when Texas Commerce Bancshares celebrated the 150th anniversary of the Republic of Texas with an ad paying homage to the heroes of the Texas Revolution, leading the list was oligarch Mirabeau Buonaparte Lamar, with no mention of the patriot Sam Houston.

In the late 1800s-early 1900s, the government of the State of Texas was dominated by an alliance between the King Ranch and Col. Edward House. House, who later gained fame as Woodrow Wilson’s controller, was the son of a wealthy British plantation owner in Houston. Back in Houston, the House family groomed young Jesse Jones to take over as Houston’s leading light. In the 1920s, Jones became a real estate developer in New York, and among his partners was Robert Lovett, who succeeded E.H. Harriman as the head of the Union Pacific Railroad. Jones’s personal attorney was Capt. James Addison Baker of Baker & Botts, a firm which represented Harriman interests in Texas. Jones, in turn, passed the torch to what became known as the “8F Crowd,” so named because they gathered to play poker and run the state in Room 8F of Jones’s Lamar Hotel. The 8F crowd ran Houston and exerted considerable control over state affairs from the 1940s to the 1960s, and created institutions that continue to exert significant power today, notably three of the most powerful law firms in the country, Baker & Botts, Vinson & Elkins, and Fulbright & Jaworski. Until the late-1980s demise of the Texas banking system, these law firms were all closely associated with a major bank: Baker & Botts with Texas Commerce; Vinson & Elkins with First City; and Fulbright & Jaworski with Bank of the Southwest.

Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch
In 1983, Debrett’s Peerage Ltd., publisher of Debrett’s Peerage and Baronetage, issued a book entitled Debrett’s Texas Peerage, on “the aristocrats of Texas.” Featured quite prominently in the book was “The Royal Family of Ranching,” the Klebergs of the King Ranch.

“Robert Justus Kleberg, Jr., was a god among Texas ranchers,” the chapter on the King Ranch began. “They still talk about him today in reverent tones, not only on ranches around the world, but at `21,’ The Pierre, Saratoga, The Jockey Club and other exclusive enclaves which he used to frequent during racing season in the East.”

The New York Times has repeatedly referred to the spread as “the legendary King Ranch,” and Debrett’s said that before the ranch opened itself to oil production, it was known as “the Walled Kingdom.” The Klebergs, Debrett’s gushed, had “lifelong friendships with the Whitneys, Vanderbilts and other horsey families of the East.” The ranch has also been host to some of the most powerful oligarchs in the world, including Prince Johannes von Thurn und Taxis, hereditary head of the Venetian intelligence service, and Prince Charles of Britain. Anne Armstrong of the King Ranch was U.S. Ambassador to Britain in the 1970s, as well as being chairman of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) from 1982 to 1990, under Reagan and Bush. [5]

The King Ranch was formed in 1857 by Captain Richard King, who had made his living as a steamboat captain running cargo and passengers along the Rio Grande River; he had arrived on the Rio Grande just after Gen. Zachary Taylor arrived with his army to defend the State of Texas against Mexico. King and his partner, Mifflin Kenedy, ran supplies for Taylor, in an operation which was actually an intelligence network operating under the cover of commerce. Just prior to the Civil War, King and Kenedy bought huge tracts of land just south of Corpus Christi; another member of the network was Charles Stillman, a border merchant who later moved to New York to found the National City Bank (a.k.a. Citibank). King’s principal lawyer in the early days was Stephen Powers of Brownsville, who had previously been a U.S. consul to Switzerland.

During the Civil War, the King Ranch was an important transshipment point for Confederate supplies, particularly when the Mexican port of Matamoros took on crucial importance after the Union blockade closed the ports in the South. The ranch also functioned as an intelligence center for the Confederacy.

The Klebergs entered the picture when Robert Justus Kleberg (“Kleberg the First,” according to Debrett’s) married Captain King’s daughter, Alice. When Captain King died in 1885, Kleberg took command of the ranch. Kleberg the First and Alice had two sons and three daughters. The elder son, Richard Mifflin Kleberg, went to Washington as a Congressmen, and hired a young man named Lyndon Johnson as an aide. The younger son, Robert, Jr., eventually took over the ranch from his father.

The business operations of the ranch in the mid-1980s were run by Jim Clement, the Princeton-trained son of Martin Clement, a former honcho of the Pennsylvania Railroad. One of Clement’s friends and regular guests was the late Prince Johannes von Thurn und Taxis, the aforementioned Venetian spook and oligarch.

The King Ranch got a financial boost when oil was discovered on the property, and royalties from Humble Oil & Refining (later bought by Exxon) started rolling in. With their social and political connections, and the oil money, the King-Kleberg heirs moved into the corporate world. [6]

In 1977, Prince Charles visited the Armstrong Ranch to play polo with Anne’s husband, Tobin Armstrong of the Armstrong Ranch; his brother John Armstrong of the neighboring King Ranch; John’s son Charles Armstrong, and oil heir Will Farish of Houston, among others.

Enter the Schlumbergers
On Jan. 10, 1901, Captain Anthony Lucas and Patillo Higgins discovered oil at Spindletop, Texas. The Spindletop salt dome contained enough oil to double the production of the Pennsylvania fields where John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil ruled, and allowed the United States to surpass Russia as the world’s leading oil producer. Oil had been drilled in Texas since 1866, but Texas had never come close to matching the output of Pennsylvania–until Spindletop. With the Spindletop gusher, a black-gold rush began, and fortune-seekers from all over the world poured into Texas. Among them were oligarchs and their agents, seeking to gain control over this new source of wealth. Over time, Houston became a center of the oil industry, and a captive of the British-dominated global oil cartel.

With Schlumberger came two important figures: Jean de Menil and his wife, Dominique Schlumberger de Menil. Jean, whose background had been deliberately muddied, was a Tsarist White Russian of some stature, who had fled Russia to avoid Communist reprisals, while Dominique was the daughter of company co-founder Conrad Schlumberger. As a top official of Schlumberger, Jean de Menil’s responsibilities included the company’s Ibero-American operations, while Dominique was a cultural and political warfare operative who founded the Rothko Chapel as a coordinating point for all sorts of unsavory operations, including terrorist networks involved in the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat.

While the full story of Schlumberger’s intelligence remains the subject for further investigation, some aspects are already known. Jean de Menil, as documented in EIR’s book Dope, Inc., was a member of the Solidarists, a group comprised of Eastern European and White Russian fascists and feudalists. Many of the Solidarists had been officials of “quisling” pro-Hitler governments during World War II. A leading component of the Solidarist movement was a highly professional espionage, sabotage, and assassination network called the Narodnyi Trudovoy Soyuz (NTS). The NTS had been founded by Menshevik circles in Russia in the 1920s, and functioned as one of British Intelligence’s premier spy rings inside Russia. The principal Western financing conduit for the NTS and the Solidarist movement was the Tolstoy Foundation of New York, of which Jean de Menil was a director.

De Menil and Schlumberger were involved in helping to put Castro in power in Cuba, and later in attempts to overthrow him, in operations involving both the CIA and George Bush’s Zapata Offshore oil company. More importantly, Jean de Menil was a key figure in Permindex, the corporate front for the assassins of John F. Kennedy and the numerous attempts on the life of French President Charles de Gaulle. Permindex was closely linked with British Intelligence’s Special Operations Executive of Sir William Stephenson and Col. Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, and with the FBI’s secret Division Five, headed by Bloomfield. Schlumberger’s links with the intelligence community are also indicated by its close relationship to former CIA director George Bush, and the presence on its board today of former CIA director John Deutch. This is not to suggest that Schlumberger is a CIA “front,” however, but rather that Schlumberger is part of a much older oligarchic intelligence network, with tentacles into national intelligence agencies such as the CIA.

The Schlumberger/de Menil apparatus had strong ties to the Houston corporate world and ruling elite. Jean de Menil was, for a time, on the board of Bank of the Southwest, the bank closely interlinked with Fulbright & Jaworski, the firm which produced Nuremberg and Watergate prosecutor Leon Jaworski. Baker & Botts partner Dillon Anderson, an official in the Eisenhower administration, was on the board of the Schlumberger Foundation in the 1950s, and senior partner George Jewell was on the board of Schlumberger in the 1980s. Schlumberger is also closely linked with Lazard, which played a big role in financing Texas companies like George Bush’s Zapata and Pennzoil. Later, Dominique de Menil would co-found the Carter-Menil Center in Atlanta, with former President Jimmy Carter. A key liaison between Carter and de Menil was Charles W. Duncan of Houston, who is both a former president of Coca-Cola and Carter’s Secretary of Energy. Both Charles and his brother John House Duncan sat on numerous corporate boards of relevance to this network, including John Duncan’s seat on the King Ranch board.

Schlumberger family and board member Didier Primat has rather secretive operations in the Carolinas and Virginia, overlapping the intelligence and eugenics operations of the Smith-Richard Foundation and the family of Bush legal counsel C. Boyden Gray. Primat also held the property title to Mary Sue Terry, who, as Virginia Attorney General, led a witch-hunt against the Lyndon LaRouche movement, throwing a number of innocent individuals into state prison on trumped-up charges.

These Texas-Virginia-Carolina connections also played a role in the rise of Charlotte, N.C. as a national banking center. Charlotte’s North Carolina National Bank (NCNB) has, through an ever-larger series of acquisitions, transformed itself into Bank of America, one of the largest banks in the world, while crosstown rival First Union has grown into a top-ten bank in the United States. NCNB significantly extended its reach in 1989, when it bought the bankrupt First RepublicBank of Dallas for virtually nothing, in a move that helped conceal the maneuvering that was used to keep First RepublicBank’s doors open until after Presidential candidate (and former director) George Bush had won the Texas primary. NCNB transformed itself into NationsBank in 1991, with the acquisition of C&S/Sovran, itself the union of Georgia and Virginia banks. After a number of smaller acquisitions, NationsBank bought the San Francisco-based Bank of America in 1998; with the takeover, NationsBank renamed itself Bank of America, with the headquarters, and the control, remaining in Charlotte. Bank of America is number 12 on the list of top contributors to the political campaigns of Gov. George W. Bush, and in its NCNB days, the bank was caught running dirty tricks against the LaRouche movement.

The Bush League
After graduating from Yale, young Skull & Bones member George Herbert Walker Bush got his start in the business world at Cleveland-based Dresser Industries, where his Bonesman father, Prescott Bush, was a director from 1930 until he entered the U.S. Senate in 1952. Dresser was controlled by the W.A. Harriman & Co. bank, [7] where Prescott Bush worked and where George H.W. Bush’s uncle and namesake, George Herbert “Bert” Walker, was president. After stints in Cleveland and California, young Bush moved to the Permian basin oilpatch town of Odessa, Texas, circa 1949, to work for Dresser’s IDECO subsidiary. While Bush would cultivate an image as a Texan, the money which would finance his career came from Wall Street and the City of London; under the cowboy hat was a preppie Connecticut Yankee.

Not long after arriving in Texas, Bush decided to strike out on his own, forming the Bush-Overbey Company with landman John Overbey, funded with $300,000 raised through Uncle Bert Walker. A significant portion of that money came from the City of London and from Scottish investor James (later Sir James) G.S. Gammell of Edinburgh’s Ivory & Sime. Other investors included the Lazard-linked publisher of The Washington Post, Eugene Meyer, and daddy Prescott Bush. Gammell, by the way, would later partner with Schlumberger’s Didier Primat in Adams Bank.

In 1953, Bush decided to link up with Midland oilmen the Leidtke brothers, the sons of a Tulsa judge who became a top lawyer for the Mellons’ Gulf Oil. They formed a new company, Zapata Petroleum, financed through Uncle Herbert; Herbert kept a chunk of the company for himself, and sold some to James Gammell, who got a seat on the board. Basically, Herbert Walker raised $500,000, and the Leidtkes’ Tulsa crowd raised a like amount. In 1954, the company formed Zapata Offshore, a for-hire drilling subsidiary. Officially, the offshore company was formed to take advantage of the new leases being offered in the Gulf of Mexico, but there were other reasons as well. Zapata’s first rig, the Scorpion, was leased by Gulf Oil in 1958 (three years before the Bay of Pigs fiasco) and started drilling just 54 miles north of Isabela, Cuba, a perfect base for covert intelligence operations against Castro.

In 1959, Bush and the Leidtkes decided to split their company into two parts, with Bush taking the CIA-connected Zapata Offshore, and the Leidtkes taking the rest. Bush became CEO of Zapata Offshore and moved it to Houston, while the Leidtkes expanded Zapata Petroleum through mergers, eventually transforming it into the Houston-based Pennzoil. But it wasn’t long before Bush cast his eye on politics.

In those days, the Democratic Party, dominant in Texas, was divided into two camps: a liberal/FDR-influenced wing led by Ralph Yarborough, Sam Rayburn, and Wright Patman, and a Dixiecrat wing, grouped around former Democratic Texas Governor Alan Shivers and John Connally, who ultimately ran for President as a Republican. These Dixiecrats would become the basis for a Republican takeover of the South, determined to undo the industrial and racial progress which had occurred in the South under FDR and the war mobilization.

When Bush moved to Houston in 1959, he began socializing with the likes of James A. Baker III, and the Houston oily-garchs, and became active with the Harris County Republican Party, of which he became chairman in 1963, helped both by Harriman money and the sudden dropping out of the race by his opponent. In September 1963, he announced another Senatorial bid. Bush won the Republican nomination, but lost the election to Yarborough. But Bush had an ace up his sleeve, with a lawsuit to force a redrawing of Congressional districts in Texas. The result was the creation of an entirely new district on the west side of Houston, an area which Bush had carried in the 1964 election. Faced with this gift of a friendly district with no incumbent, Bush left Zapata Offshore in 1966 to run for Congress. Not surprisingly, he won, and in January 1967, George Bush became a member of the House of Representatives. In Congress, Bush heavily pushed birth control and malthusian policies, while defending the oil depletion allowance. Dissatisfied with a seat in the House, however, Representative Bush decided to run for the Senate in 1970. In that race, he expected to face Yarborough, but Yarborough lost the Democratic nomination to Lloyd Bentsen, who beat Bush 53% to 47%.

After the defeat, Bush took a series of non-elective offices. In December 1970, Nixon appointed Bush to the post of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Bush moved to New York City, and the Waldorf-Astoria. He was nominally working for Secretary of State William Rogers, but his real boss was National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger. In 1973, Nixon appointed Bush to head the Republican National Committee. When Nixon resigned in 1974, Bush angled for President Gerald Ford to appoint him Vice President, but the job went to Nelson Rockefeller, and Bush got the job as U.S. Liaison to the People’s Republic of China; since the United States did not have formal diplomatic relations with China at the time, Bush was not officially an ambassador, and thus did not require what would likely have been a difficult confirmation by the Senate. In late 1975, Ford shifted personnel around, in preparation for his own Presidential bid, and George Bush was appointed director of the CIA. After a contentious confirmation battle, Bush was confirmed by the Senate and sworn in as CIA Director on Jan. 30, 1976. It was a short-lived post, as Ford lost to Carter, and Bush returned to Texas when Carter took over in 1977.

Back in Houston, Bush was appointed to the board of First International Bank of Houston, its parent First International Bankshares (a.k.a., InterFirst) of Dallas, and InterFirst’s London-based First International Bankshares merchant bank. [8] Bush also joined a few corporate and educational boards, and became an adjunct professor at Rice University.

Bush’s main preoccupation was building a political machine that would carry him to the White House, and one of his key allies was James A. Baker III. Baker was the chairman of the Reagan-Bush campaign in 1980, while fellow Texan Robert Strauss headed the Carter-Mondale effort. Baker had headed the Ford campaign in 1976, and had been Ford’s Deputy Secretary of Commerce. Oilman Robert Mosbacher headed up Bush’s national finance operation.

Bush formally announced his Presidential candidacy on May 1, 1979, and one of his campaign themes was the Union of English-Speaking Peoples. “The British are the best friend America has in the world today…. Sure, I’m an Anglophile,” Bush said at the time. “We should all be. Britain has never done anything bad to the United States.”

`Post-Industrial’ Southern Strategy
The heart of the Southern Strategy was the oligarchy’s plan to shift the United States from the world’s most powerful industrial economy, into a post-industrial rentier-financier empire. The industrialized cities of the North would be allowed to decay, while the relatively small cities of the South would be built up as cheap-labor service centers. As the Industrial Belt turned into the Rust Belt, the New South ascended. Houston, spurred by the oil boom, became the fourth-largest city in the country, old Atlanta became the “New Atlanta,” and sleepy Charlotte became a major international financial center. Existing cities were transformed–Dallas, San Antonio, Jacksonville, Orlando, Tampa-St. Petersburg, Miami, to name a few–while Northern cities such as Baltimore, Cleveland, and Philadelphia went into decline.

Coincident with this Southern shift, was the ascension of finance over industry. U.S. industry had largely been in the hands of the financiers since the days of J.P. Morgan’s creation of the industrial trusts, and that control was rapidly consolidated during the 1980s. Orchestrated by Bush’s masters, the speculators took over. The corporate raiders, financed by the dirty-money junk bond networks, bought up significant chunks of corporate America, and terrified the rest. The raiders’ targets, and those who feared they might become targets, turned to Wall Street’s investment banks and law firms for “protection.” As such, the leveraged buy-out/junk bond operation functioned as a giant protection racket, destroying some as a way of collecting tribute from the rest. At the same time, dirty money poured into the real estate market, notably through the giant Canadian developers Olympia & York and Cadillac Fairview. These firms built the skyscrapers which were then filled up with service workers–bankers, lawyers, accountants, clerks, and other white-collar types. Having the tallest office building became something of a fetish for the business leaders, spurring ever larger towers, which in turn were filled with ever larger numbers of white-collar workers.

The pouring of hot money into the real estate markets caused real estate prices to rise. The “wealth” created by these rising values provided more money to pump into the bubble. The rising stock market served a similar function. The cities were transformed into service centers ringed by suburbia, leaving the inner cities full of the poor and minorities, ripe for Strategic Bombing Survey decimation through drug distribution and “Negro removal.”

In the office buildings and the suburbs, the ordinary citizen was also being hooked on speculation. One of the effects of Fed Chairman Paul Volcker’s deadly interest-rate hikes in 1979-80, was that ordinary savings accounts suddenly started paying high rates of interest, giving the ordinary citizen a taste of the action. As more and more of the “little people” discovered the joys of usury, the modern “my money” era was born. That process escalated with the rise in residential real estate prices–homes were transformed from residences to “investments,” with rising equity values adding significantly to the pools of “my money.” The ordinary citizen also began making money from the rising stock market. Over time, a significant portion of the population became addicted to usury and speculation, considering it their right to make money from the manipulation of money. The speculator went from being the enemy to being the role model; the suckers now identified with the casino. The old-style productive industry became the realm of “losers,” replaced by the hot new “industries” of finance and information. Make derivatives, not steel!

While this transformation was made possible by the policy changes in Washington and in the states, the mechanism for the change was specific networks within the corporate world.

The junk-bond market of the 1980s, for example, was a joint operation of the Morgan/Rothschild Drexel Burnham Lambert investment bank, and the money laundries of Dope, Inc. Today, the junk bond market is bigger than ever, with more junk bonds issued in 1998 alone, than in all of the 1980s combined. The leveraged buy-out (LBO) wave was led by Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts, which was closely linked to the Harriman/Bush machine, and continues with such new Bush-connected players as Hicks Muse Tate & Furst, the Carlyle Group, the Bass Brothers, Richard Rainwater, and Sam Wylie’s Maverick Capital hedge fund. The LBO market declined significantly during the 1990s, as highly inflated stock prices became the currency of choice for takeovers, but is now making a comeback as a vehicle for taking key assets private in preparation for a crash.

The Texas networks have spawned wave after wave of deregulation. The deregulation of the airline industry began in Texas with Frank Lorenzo and Texas Air, which became Texas International, and ultimately took over Continental and Eastern, while the Bush League’s Albert Checchi took over Northwest Airlines. Texas is also the center of energy deregulation, home to Enron and a host of smaller competitors, such as James A. Baker III’s Reliant Energy (the parent of Houston Lighting & Power) and Dynegy; while many other players have Houston links, notably North Carolina’s Duke Energy and the Schlumberger-linked CMS and American Electric Power. Enron has also moved into the private water market in England and the United States, hoping to get a piece of the income streams from water and sewage.

The effect of all this deregulation and speculation has been the decimation of the physical economy of the United States. Over the last three decades, the productive capacity of the U.S. economy has been cut in half, measured in terms of market baskets of goods on a per-capita, per-household, and per-square-kilometer basis. At the same time, the monetary claims on that declining production have risen hyperbolically. The process defined by rapidly rising claims on a steadily declining production is clearly unsustainable–at some point, it must break down; the question is not if, but when, that will occur.

Post-Crash Positioning
It is widely understood among the governments, political elites, and by the financial oligarchy, that the present financial system is doomed. While there is a desperate attempt to postpone the inevitable as long as possible, the serious thought is being put into preparing a new system to be implemented when this one goes. From the oligarchic perspective, the key to retaining control in a post-crash environment is twofold:

1) smash the power of sovereign nations through balkanization and globalization, so that they cannot protect their citizens from looting; and

2) grab control of as much of the world’s supplies of essential raw materials, strategic minerals, food supplies, energy supplies, and similar assets as possible. If they can do those two things, the oligarchs believe, they can run the post-crash world.

This process is far advanced, both within the United States and internationally. Take electricity, for example: U.S. firms such as Enron have been buying up power plants all over the world. One little-known firm, AES Corp.,[9] is poised to become the largest generator of electricity in Ibero-America, once its various acquisitions are completed. If you and a cartel of “competitors” can control the electricity supply of a continent, you have tremendous power to decide who survives and who dies, while grabbing as much of the electricity income stream as the market will bear.

Apply the same process to agriculture, where consolidation among the major food companies is proceeding at a breathtaking pace. Apply it to the telecommunications companies, which provide essential communications services; apply it to the production of strategic minerals and metals that are essential to modern industrial production. What you are left with, in effect, is a return to the days of the empires, when imperial trading companies controlled entire continents, and those who were not involved in making the companies rich, were considered expendable.


1. Halliburton, which acquired the Harrimans’ Dresser Industries, has surpassed Schlumberger as the largest oilfield services company. Among Halliburton’s subsidiaries is Brown & Root, the Houston construction firm which does sensitive work worldwide for the Pentagon and the State Department. Halliburton was also the first U.S. oil company to work the Chinese mainland and, beginning in 1986, was selected by the People’s Republic of China to perform offshore field work. In the 1980s, the Halliburton board included James Glanville of Lazard, Lord Polwarth of the Royal Bank of Scotland, William Simon of Wesray and Kissinger Associates, and the King Ranch’s Anne Armstrong. The “Torbitt” report identified Halliburton and Brown & Root as being among the principal financiers of Permindex, the financial front suspected of involvement in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Halliburton head Richard Cheney, a former Secretary of Defense, left the firm to become George W. Bush’s Vice President.

2. The Schlumberger family was part of a Swiss-based intelligence network operating in partnership with the British Secret Intelligence Service, to defeat the American Revolution. Among the agents run by this network were Aaron Burr, the man who killed Alexander Hamilton and who was tried for treason, Jefferson’s Treasury Secretary Albert Gallatin, and the most notorious of all American traitors, Benedict Arnold. A key role was played by members of the Prevost family, British military commanders from a Swiss oligarchic family which was intermarried with the Mallet family of the de Neuflize, Schlumberger Mallet Bank, known today as the Schlumberger interests. For further details, see Anton Chaitkin, Treason in America (Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review, 1998).

3. Lazard Freres is an international investment bank, operating out of Paris.

4. The firm today known as Baker & Botts was formed in 1866 by Judge Peter Gray and Walter Browne Botts, and became Baker & Botts when Captain James A. Baker joined in the 1870s. It had a distinct Confederate and Masonic heritage. Judge Gray had been the Assistant Treasurer of the Confederate States of America, where, under the command of Confederate Secretary of State Robert Toombs, he had financed the operations of Gen. Albert Pike among the Indian tribes in the Southwest. After the war, Pike and Toombs reestablished the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite, and Pike deputy Philip C. Tucker set up a Scottish Rite lodge in Houston in 1867, with Walter Browne Botts and Benjamin Botts as leaders. Captain Baker would later play a key role in pushing eugenics–the precursor of Nazi race science–for the Harrimans, through Rice University, which he helped found and chaired for 40 years. In 1912, Baker brought in the head of the British Eugenics Society, Julian Huxley, to help the school set up its biology department.

5. Anne Legendre Armstrong, the daughter of aristocratic New Orleans coffee merchant Armant Legendre, became friends with Helenita Kleberg at the exclusive Foxcroft School and Vassar College. She married Tobin Armstrong, whose brother John was married to Helenita’s sister Henrietta Kleberg, and was second in command at the King Ranch. The Armstrongs trace their heritage to Texas Ranger John Armstrong, an enforcer for the King Ranch in its early days. Their much smaller Armstrong Ranch is, politically, an adjunct to the King Ranch. At PFIAB, Armstrong was involved in operations against Lyndon LaRouche and his associates, and helped bring Henry Kissinger into the Reagan administration in 1983. She chaired the advisory committee of the influential Georgetown Center for Strategic and International Studies, and was co-chair of the Republican National Committee in 1971-73.

6. Belton Kleberg “B.K.” Johnson started his own ranch, and joined the boards of AT&T, Campbell Soup, Tenneco, U.S. Trust and First City Bancorp., among others. His half-brother Robert Richard “Bobby” Shelton bought a ranch in Kerrville, Texas; Bobby Shelton also served a stint as head of the Texas Department of Public Safety, the state police agency which included the famous Texas Rangers, which at times seemed to have functioned as the private police of the King Ranch and its cohorts. These offspring, along with Anne Armstrong, were heavily interlocked with the 8F Crowd institutions in Houston. BK and Anne both sat on the board of First City Bancorp. of Houston, and Anne was also a director of American Express, General Motors, Boise Cascade, Braniff, Union Carbide, and Halliburton.

7. W.A. Harriman & Co., organized in 1919, was the private bank of the Harriman family. The chairman was W. Averell Harriman, who with his brother Roland “Bunny” Harriman controlled the bank, while founding members included George Herbert Walker, Sr. and Percy Rockefeller. Prescott Bush joined the firm in 1926. All but one were members of Skull & Bones; Walker was not, but his son, G.H. Walker, Jr., would be.

In 1931, W.A. Harriman & Co. merged with the Brown Brothers investment bank to form Brown Brothers Harriman. The Harriman brothers and Prescott Bush were senior partners at BBH, while Walker retired to his own G.H. Walker & Co. Brown Brothers was a spin-off of the British bank Brown, Shipley, whose best-known partner was Bank of England head Montagu Norman.

In October 1942, the U.S. government seized the Union Banking Corp. under the Trading With the Enemy Act for acting as an agent of Nazi Germany. UBC had been co-founded by Bert Walker, Sr., and its board included Roland Harriman and Prescott Bush. Several other Harriman-Bush-related companies were also seized, for the same reason.

8. In 1987, the ailing InterFirst merged with its Dallas crosstown rival RepublicBank to form First RepublicBank, which became the biggest bank in Texas and ultimately its biggest banking disaster. Within months, First RepublicBank was insolvent, but Federal regulators kept the bank open until after the Texas primary in Spring 1988, to avoid embarrassing Bush in his Presidential bid. A few weeks after Bush won the primary, the remnants of the bank were sold to Charlotte’s NCNB in a sweetheart deal. A Federal study later revealed that the government had pumped $3 billion into the bank to keep it afloat.

9. AES may be not be widely known, but it has very high-level sponsors. Co-founder Roger Sant is a director of Prince Philip’s World Wildlife Fund/World Wide Fund for Nature, and AES director Russell Train is the former chairman and president of the WWF. AES specializes in expanding into areas controlled by narco-terrorists.

Web posted at: