The Israeli news outlet Ynet reported that the latest efficacy figure for Pfizer’s Chinese Virus injection has dropped to about 64 percent amid reports that vaccinated people everywhere are testing “positive” for the trendy new “variants” that are supposedly now in circulation. Because the numbers continue to slide, suggesting that the Pfizer vaccine is a fraud, authorities are […]WOW!!! Israeli Scientists Reveal Pfizer LIED About Covid Vaccine Being ‘95% Effective’ – PFIZER SPOKESMAN RESPONDS BY SAYING IGNORE THE SCIENCE — Evans News Report
Source: greatreject.org A clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory says he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of 1500 samples of people tested “positive” could find Covid-19. ALL people were simply found to have Influenza A, and to a lesser extent Influenza […]Laboratories in the US can’t find Covid-19 in 1500 positive tests — Nwo Report
By Dr. Joseph Mercola Global Research, April 14, 2021Mercola Region: USA Theme: Media Disinformation, Police State & Civil Rights, Science and Medicine *** In some areas of the world, including Florida, where I live, life has been fairly normal for almost a full year. Restaurants opened last April, and people have flocked here from out of state and even from […]Fearmongering Goes Nuclear — ‘We’re in Brand-New Pandemic’ — BIG BROTHER in the 21. Century
The above quote is from the CDC. And look at this graph showing the difference between South Dakota (no mask mandate) vs Montana (mask mandate) I don’t see much difference, do you? “MASK MANDATES : So glad to see we are following the peer-reviewed science and the evidence on masks,” says Craig Kelly. “Why […]Face masks – “14 randomized controlled trials did not support a substantial effect on transmission” — Iowa Climate Science Education
Today we learn that 22 highly renowned scientists conclude that the PCR test produces 97% false positives. So out of all of the Covid patients we’ve ever seen, 97% never had Covid.
WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives
Warnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.
by Kit Knightly
The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?
The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify.
The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material.
The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”.
The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.
This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.
To quote their own words [our emphasis]:
Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.
They go on to explain [again, our emphasis]:
The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low.
Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the “pandemic” narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell.
Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.
Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:
with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.
And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said:
If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.CONTINUE: https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/why-does-the-who-now-admit-that-the-pcr-covid-tests-are-not-accurate-so-they-can-claim-the-vaccine-is-working/
I really cannot believe that the Covid19 catalogue of inaccurate data, gross alarmism and statistical error can be put down to “innocent mistakes”. Everyone involved in this mess is guilty of omission and/or deliberate hype. But who will prosecute the guilty? Some of you will by now have read the astonishing post at Zero Hedge […]At the End of the Day — The Slog
Covert op: “the virus” as cover story Jon Rappoport / Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport December 2, 2020 (To join our email list, click here.) For months, I’ve been demonstrating that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists (start here). Instead, elite planners have been selling A STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. In covert intelligence operations, this […]Covert op: “the virus” as cover story — Truth11