Safeguard you, family and pets with factual information From: email@example.com On Behalf Of Josh del Sol Beaulieu Sent: March-29-19 10:58 AM Subject: Make visible the invisible… Today I’m going to share with you the most powerful & economical tool I have found, as your next step to protect you & your family’s health. This tool […]
Virginia utility regulators have rejected Dominion Energy’s $5 billion plan … The post Virginia Becomes the 4th U.S. State in the Past Year to Reject Utility ‘Smart’ Metering Plans appeared first on Monitoring the Planned Poisoning of Humanity.
By Anna von Reitz
Many people are profoundly confused. This System the rats have put in place IS confusing and it is MEANT to be confusing.
That’s their whole schtick— to confuse you with other corporate personas and to confuse you regarding the jurisdiction they are
operating in. And they do a good job of both, if you let them.
The governmental services corporations operating under whatever name— say, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.—
have what is called a “deemed trust interest” in the people and the assets of the land and sea they service. This is a weak trust
interest, similar to a mechanics lien on a house. It only comes into play when and if the actual trust operators fail to function—and
that is what has happened.
The governmental services corporation operated by FDR went bankrupt and falsely claimed that the federal “states” and
“citizenry thereof” were voluntary sureties standing good for the debts of the United States of America, Inc. (Conference of
Governors meeting March 6, 1933.) They did this in such a way as to confuse people about which “states” and which “citizens”
they were talking about (federal “states” and federal “citizens” only) which has led to all sorts of false claims against you and
your organic States of the Union.
Next, the United Nations Corporation stepped in and organized the International Monetary Fund, Inc., which organized the
UNITED STATES, INC. – a French commercial corporation, to take over the governmental services contracts of the old United
States of America, Inc.
Operating this scheme, the UNITED STATES, INC. was able to charge off all its expenses against the United States of America,
Inc. during its bankruptcy reorganization, and the cost of all this got passed through to the presumed “sureties”—us. But then,
the unthinkable happened. The Pope woke up and forced the United States of America, Inc. to end its decades long
“reorganization” and settle the bankruptcy. Suddenly, the UNITED STATES, INC. could no longer just pass through any and
every expense to the American people and their States.
The UNITED STATES, INC. has no contract with our states. Its only contract was with the bankrupt United States of America,
Inc., so they are both out of luck and out of pocket—-and seeking a means to re-establish another cozy bankruptcy fraud, war, or
other means to fill their coffers. They are also looking for the alternative route— ways to reduce their expenses by killing off and
reducing the number of their creditors.
We need to be aware of this circumstance if we wish to rightly interpret what is going on in the stock markets and headlines of the
world. We also need to be aware in terms of the propaganda that we are being fed. The UNITED STATES, INC. needs another
war for profit, so it is busy pumping up a new “enemy” called ISIS, which it funded and continues to fund. All this is being done
as a justification for spending our money and spilling our blood (not to mention the other poor suckers) so that the UNITED
STATES, INC. has an expense it can charge againstus.
The UNITED STATES makes money when it provides “services” to us, so it has been busily contriving all manner of services it
can provide —including services we don’t want or need.
The Border Problem is a money maker for the UNITED STATES. It provides services to all those Mexican immigrants, and then
charges us for the cost of this. They naturally charge us a lot more than it actually costs them, so they make out like bandits. They
also claim each new immigrant as another “American” slave, and issue bonds based on the value of their labor. Can you say,
Same thing with wars and other conflicts— remember the Department of Defense’s $400 hammers and $1500 gold-plated toilet
seats? The UNITED STATES makes money providing us with “defense services”. So long as nobody is minding the store, they
can charge however much they like for providing these “services”. And they do.
This is the conflict of interest at the heart of the current misery. The State governments are supposed to ride herd on their service
contracts with the feds, but over time, the “federal” government— the private, for-profit, foreign corporate government— has
contrived to co-opt the State governments and to redefine them as “franchises” of their own corporation. This is how we have
wound up with the “State of Georgia” and the “STATE OF GEORGIA”.
Do we seriously expect the local franchise of Burger King to question the actions of Burger King, International?
Instead, the “State” governments receive money as a kick-back from the “federal” government in the form of “federal revenue
This is why government spending is out of control and will be out of controluntil we put our feet down and stop it—-until we
seize back our misappropriated credit, and assert our position as the Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES, INC. and the
STATES it operates as franchises—and start applying the kind of pressure they understand: financial pressure.
To calm down the Border problem, groups of us have established commercial liens providing for very hefty and escalating fines
to be applied against the perpetuators and their immediate bosses, the IMF and the UN. Suddenly, it is not profitable to be
welcoming all those Mexicans. So what happens? The flood slows to a trickle.
To calm down the War Fever, groups of us have established commercial liens providing for very hefty and escalating fines to be
applied against them for every American life lost and for every bit of property damage. Suddenly, war is no longer so profitable.
We must all stop thinking of this “thing” in Washington, DC as “our” government. It is not and it never has been. It is a
criminally self-interested, foreign, for-profit, mostly foreign-owned corporation hired to provide nineteen governmental services,
and it is seriously run amok.
As a corporation there is nothing sacrosanct about the “federal government”. It has exactly the same standing and status as any
other commercial corporation on earth. We need to deal with it the same way we would deal with Ford Motor Company or
General Electric or Monsanto.
Would you “petition” the corporate officers of these companies and ask them to play nice? That’s what you are doing with all
these senseless petitions to Congress. If they wanted to play nice and were willing to play nice, they would already be doing so.
There would be no need for petitions seeking redress for grievances.
So why bother?
Would you work your rump off and spend billions of dollars on political candidates and political parties trying to elect new midlevel
corporate officers, aka, members of Congress, knowing that the direction of the corporation is utterly controlled by foreign
The UNITED STATES, INC. is owned and operated by the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (IMF) and the IMF is
owned and operated by the UNITED NATIONS, CORPORATION. Our real beef, therefore, is with the IMF and the UN.
If we have a beef with the way the UNITED STATES, INC. is being run— and we do—-then the obvious things to be done are
the same as with any other corporation. You put the bite on them and their owners and operators via bad publicity, commercial
liens, law suits in appropriate venues, and boycotts.
That’s why commercial liens against the UNITED STATES, INC. need to be filed simultaneously against the IMF and UN. They
are responsible for what the UNITED STATES, INC. is doing or failing to do, so the mismanagement of the operation comes
home to them and they are then motivated to make sure that the contracts owed by the UNITED STATES, INC. are honored and
the limitations of those contracts observed.
Otherwise the IMF and UN are quite content to let the UNITED STATES, INC. run roughshod over everyone and everything in
sight, and there is no real consequence for them. They stand in the shadows and reap the profit and don’t even get bad publicity
for their misdeeds. Drag them out into the open and lay claim to their assets.
And if any of them persist in promoting criminality of any kind, yank their charters like so many radishes in the spring.
We do have effective means of dealing with the perpetrators, but we must recognize who and what the perpetrators of this System
are: the shareholders of the UNITED STATES, INC., the IMF, and the UN Corporation, all acting in collusion with the
shareholders of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., the FEDERAL RESERVE, and the UN Corporation.
All roads now lead to the UN CORPORATION, so make the claims short and sweet and addressed to the UN Secretary General.
The members of Congress are rubber stamps and window dressing, there to entertain and reassure the public. Any real power the
Congress had was given away during the Roosevelt Administration to the Office of the President. As mid-level managers,
members of Congress now spend most of their days trying to figure out how they can more effectively lick the boots of their
foreign masters, still bring home enough bacon to satisfy the folks back home, and better feather their own nests.
Instead of wasting time and money and heartfelt effort on any aspect of the current political system or supporting candidates that
at the end of the day have neither the power nor the will to truly represent anyone but themselves and their own group of cronies,
use your resources to address the root of the problem: the UN, the IMF, the UNITED STATES, INC. and their “federal”
Expose them. Expose what they have done and are doing here. Expose their motives and deal with those motives effectively.
Realize that they are in the business of selling you “governmental services” and that you are in charge of what you buy or don’t
buy —including “Obummercare”. Don’t let anyone “represent” you or your estate in these matters. The cretins in Congress are
not there to represent you. They are there to represent the UNITED STATES, INC. They will always vote and act to enrich the
corporation at your expense.
Many will remember that back in the 1970’s magazine publishers offered “free” subscriptions—get three months of blah-blah
magazine absolutely free! No obligation! But what they didn’t tell people was that they would also receive a one month “free
subscription” to six other magazines and if the victim didn’t immediately respond and cancel all these subscriptions, they would
be charged for all of them at full price— subject to automatic renewal, too.
Such a deal we’ve got for you. Soon, if you don’t stand up for yourselves and cancel your “subscriptions” you will literally owe
your soul to the Company Store, and be obligated to buy everything from bootlaces to coffins from the UNITED STATES, INC.
The first and most important action step is to divorce from their political process. Get your own mind firmly wrapped around the
fact that the entire American political tableau is meaningless. Democrat? Republican? It doesn’t matter who gets elected to fill
those Congressional seats, because the seats themselves are bought, paid for, and controlled by a foreign corporation.
Once you truly understand this, it will be easy to rescind “your” Voter Registration and announce that you will henceforth operate
only as an Elector. It will be easy to write a letter to “your” Congressional Delegation— telling them that they don’t represent you
nor your organic State of the Union. It will be easy to do the same thing at the STATE level and express your ire that these people
who claim to “represent” you have allowed “federal revenue sharing”—-kick backs based on the misappropriation of your credit
—to undermine our nation and instead promote the establishment of federal “STATES” to usurp the rightful government you are
owed and undermine the checks and balances needed to protect the interests of the people.
Once you know who “they” are, what they are and what they aren’t, it is a lot easier to deal with them effectively and efficiently.
So this is First Base. Shrug off the chains these corporations have offered to place on you, take back your inherent standing, and
present yourself— act “without representation” and “without the United States”.
Find more articles from Anna here: http://annavonreitz.com
Originally posted on Help save our kids future: If vaccines are safe and effective, why do insurance companies and the medical industry have injury (and death) codes for when vaccines kill and cripple you or your children? If you can think, you’ll know the answer. ?
The article below was written by Zuzana Janosova Den Boer, who experienced Communist rule in Czechoslovakia before coming to Canada. She said, “Having recognized all-too familiar signs of the same propaganda in my adopted country of Canada, I felt obligated to write the article below ( I survived communism – are you ready for your turn?)– because…
A cabal is a group of people united in some close design together, usually to promote their private views or interests in a church, state, or other community, often by intrigue, usually unbeknownst to persons outside their group. Cabals are sometimes secret societies composed of a few designing persons, and at other times are manifestations of emergent behavior in society or governance on the part of a community of persons who have well established public affiliation or kinship. The term can also be used to refer to the designs of such persons or to the practical consequences of their emergent behavior, and also holds a general meaning of intrigue and conspiracy. The use of this term usually carries strong connotations of shadowy corners, back rooms and insidious influence. The term is frequently used in conspiracy theories; some Masonic conspiracy theories describe Freemasonry as an internationalistsecret cabal.
The list of knowing who is a member of the Cabal:
1. Anyone who attempts to disarm the people.
2. Anyone who subverts Natural Law in place of Statism.
3. Anyone who causes the incarceration of non-’violent activists or truth speakers.
4. Anyone attempting to make living off the land illegal.
5. Anyone who attempts to control what we put in our own bodies.
6. Anyone who attempts to silence speech, even if it “offends” someone.
7. Anyone who insists on or enables the use of fiat money and usury.
8. Anyone claiming they are separate and special from their fellow man.
9. Any judge or lawyer who enforces Admiralty Law.
10. Any police who use violence against peaceful people.
11. Anyone in mainstream media who fabricates a story or knowingly lies to the people.
12. Anyone in the education system who subverts parental rights.
13. Any medical personel who insist upon harmful chemical treatments.
14. Anyone in public service who pledges political allegiance to any entity or group outside the state, province or country of residence.
15. Anyone caught in vote tampering.
16. Anyone putting harmful ingredients in food, water or medicine.
17. Anyone involved in the privatisation or monopolization of the food industry.
18. Anyone polluting the air, land or water supply.
19. Anyone seeking to put an end to private property.
20. Anyone threatening the freedom of another based on non-violent speech alone.
21. Anyone who withholds free energy devices.
22. Anyone involved in chemtrailing.
23. Anyone who profits from war.
24. Anyone who uses their position of power to harm a child.
25. Anyone responsible for the cruelty to any animal.
26. Anyone who declares that 911 was NOT an inside job.
27. Anyone who aids those who are occupying forces in another’s land.
28. Anyone who enables, protects or justifies pedophilia.
29. Anyone found guilty of covering up our real history.
30. Anyone using deception or omission to entice one into a contract.
31. Anyone who initiates force on a peaceful people.
32. Anyone guilty of inciting violence.
33. Anyone who declares self-defense a crime.
34. Anyone who does not share the bounty of the land with the people of the land.
35. Any public official who denies the existence of the birth bond.
36. Members of AIPAC.
37. Members of the Committee of 300.
38. Members of any group that promotes Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Naziism, Zionism.
39. Any dual-citizens in any capacity serving the people.
40. Anyone promoting terrorism.
41. Anyone who denies the equality of men and women.
42. Members of the ADL.
43. Anyone profitting off the slavery of his fellow man.
44. Any medical doctor who refuses homeopathic treatments to those who want them.
45. Anyone who makes anything that grows naturally on the land.illegal.
46. Anyone who forces the vaccination of the unwilling.
47. Any public servanrt who lies to the people.
48. Anyone found guilty of physical, mental or spiritual torture.
49. Those who criminalize talk of “conspiracy theories”.
50. Anyone claiming any political party ststus.
51. Anyone attempting to steal one’s home or property based on fraudulent banking practices.
52. Anyone who supports the IMF, BIS or any central bank.
53. Anyone who subverts human rights.
54. Anyone who claims sole ownership of the land and it’s resources.
55. Anyone who seeks to stop the assembly of the people.
56. Members of Freemasonry.
57. Members of B’Nai Brith.
58. Members of CFR.
59. Members of TriLateral Commission.
60. Members of the Bilderberger Group.
61. Members of NATO.
62. Members of the United Nations.
63. Anyone who acts against the will of the people after a referendum vote.
64. Anyone who seeks to divide a people on the basis of religion, color or sex.
65. Anyone who seeks to control the internet or any form of information.
Association with Charles II
The term took on its present meaning from a group of ministers of King Charles II of England (Sir Thomas Clifford, Lord Arlington, the Duke of Buckingham, Lord Ashley, and Lord Lauderdale), whose initial letters coincidentally spelled CABAL, and who were the signatories of the Secret Treaty of Doverthat allied England to France in a prospective war against the Netherlands. However, the Cabal Ministrythey formed can hardly be seen as such; the Scot Lauderdale was not much involved in English governance at all, while the Catholic ministers of the Cabal (Clifford and Arlington) were never much in sympathy with the Protestants (Buckingham and Ashley). Nor did Buckingham and Ashley get on very well with each other. Thus the “Cabal Ministry” never really unified in its members’ aims and sympathies, and fell apart by 1672; Lord Ashley, who became Earl of Shaftesbury, later became one of Charles II’s fiercest opponents. The theory that the word originated as an acronym from the names of the group of ministers is a folk etymology, although the coincidence was noted at the time and could possibly have popularized its use. The group, who came to prominence after the fall of Charles’ firstChief Minister, Lord Clarendon, in 1667, was rather called the Cabal because of its secretiveness and lack of responsibility to the “Country party” then run out of power.