EXPOSED: The British are Running a Coup Operation Against the President of the United States…Again — American Intelligence Media

The BIG PROPAGANDA LIE: Trump and Russia Collusion tried to destroy the Trump presidency while international conspirators planned more nefarious actions against the President of the United States, using the same rogue government – international players that took out President Kennedy. Learn and decide for yourself what the truth really is.

via EXPOSED: The British are Running a Coup Operation Against the President of the United States…Again — American Intelligence Media

Advertisements

How banksters and lawyers are stealing homes from Americans — Patriots for Truth

Douglas Gabriel interviews two victims of mortgage fraud and explains how the cabal is creating digital records of mortgage deeds in a convoluted lawyer-scheme to steal your home. If you have a mortgage, this is a MUST listen and read. After you listen to the audio, continue your citizen education and read: Exchange Casinos Control […]

via How banksters and lawyers are stealing homes from Americans — Patriots for Truth

I UV Report

Deutsche Bank Compliance Chief, 5 Board Member Offices Raided As Stock Hits All Time Low

Posted: 30 Nov 2018 10:44 AM PST

    Deutsche Bank Compliance Chief, 5 Board Member Offices Raided As Stock Hits All Time Low by Tyler Durden,  published on Zero Hedge, on November 30, 2018 Reeling from a Morgan Stanley downgrade of European Banks and a second day of raids on its Frankfurt headquarters, Deutsche Bank shares declined by another 3% on
Bob, whatever happened to Podesta and where is the Server?

Posted: 29 Nov 2018 10:28 PM PST

Bob, whatever happened to Podesta and where is the Server? by u/SerialBrain2, published on Reddit, on November 29, 2018   Before we proceed, congratulations to Cindy Hyde Smith who brought in the Mississippi Senate seat and confirmed the 53-47 Trump and Q Senate midterm prediction I wrote about earlier. Did you notice right before congratulating her,
#HATJ: Military criminal investigative organizations crack down on sextortion ring targeting service members

Posted: 29 Nov 2018 09:41 PM PST

#HATJ: Military criminal investigative organizations crack down on sextortion ring targeting service members bz: HATJ, asked for followup details on the press release about this event I had sent her. This is her reply… From: HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF (86748007) TO: BZ Riger Date: 11/29/2018 3:21:37 PM Subject: RE: RE: MIS and state and feds press
Mr. Huber Goes to Washington

Posted: 29 Nov 2018 01:02 PM PST

Mr. Huber Goes to Washington by Brian Kates, published on The Epoch Times, on November 25, 2018 From the moment it was announced that Jeff Sessions was resigning as attorney general, to be replaced by the far-lesser-known Matthew Whitaker, the mainstream media began pushing a narrative that President Donald Trump is preparing to fire special
FULL ARTICLE Benjamin Fulford 11-26-18… “Rothschild rule ends after 250 years; new era to begin”

Posted: 29 Nov 2018 09:33 PM PST

  FULL ARTICLE Benjamin Fulford 11-26-18… “Rothschild rule ends after 250 years; new era to begin” by Kauilapele, published on November 29, 2018 Here’s the full version of the weekly report from Ben. The way he puts it in the title, this is pretty big time news. With the cabal takedown, things are definitely progressing. Some may
Yanis Varoufakis on Julian Assange and the Political Economy & future of Europe

Posted: 29 Nov 2018 09:25 PM PST

      Yanis Varoufakis on Julian Assange and the Political Economy & future of Europe     In this exclusive interview with bestselling author, former finance minister of Greece and the co-founder of the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, Yanis Varoufakis, we talk about the case of Julian Assange, the socio-economic transformations taking place
#HATJ: Deutsche Bank headquarters raided over money laundering

Posted: 29 Nov 2018 09:19 PM PST

BZ: I sent this article to HATJ, here was her reply… From:HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF (86748007) To: BZ Riger Date: 11/29/2018 3:21:18 PM Sunject: RE: Deutsche Bank headquarters raided over money the funny part is that when you have “law enforcement”, uhhhhmmm, “raiding” banks for cash to operate because the banks no longer want to pay
CIRCLING THE DRAIN

Posted: 29 Nov 2018 01:41 PM PST

  CIRCLING THE DRAIN       With revelations of vast criminality within the Clinton Foundation ready to be made very public thanks to Huber and the ongoing investigations into the Clinton’s fraudulent “charity”, we wanted to share this article for the critics who continue to say “nothing is happening.” Rest assured, there is a

Hold the Presses! This is Incredible 1.0


By Anna Von Reitz

I have a statement on my desk attributed to former Democratic Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa.  He retired in 2015 after twenty years service in the U.S. Congress, ten years in the House, ten years in the Senate.  So he should know what he is talking about, right?
He is still alive so far as I can discover, so maybe someone in Iowa can track him down and ask if he actually said the things that have been reported to me and ask him to make additional comment, because what I am about to discuss is nothing less than astounding.
According to these statements sitting here on my desk this morning, Senator Harkin believes the following quotes.  My explanatory notes and answers appear in brackets [ ]:
1. Senator Harkin:  [The Internal Revenue Code] “or any other constitutional or federal provision [is/are  null and void because] “those authorities fell with the loss of our national money standard in 1933.”  —-that is, because the (Territorial) United States went off the gold standard.
[Obviously not, Senator, because the Municipal United States continued to function and the Internal Revenue Service continued to click along. Changing from the gold standard to the silver standard in commerce in 1933 could not possibly have any such international treaty consequence. Both forms of money, gold and silver, are actual money and they both pay debts which the American States and People continued to pay for stipulated services under conditions of contract assumption.
Federal Codes established by the old service corporation may have been vacated, but if so, the members of the U.S. Congress failed to serve Public Notice of those facts, and continued to publish and use those same Federal Codes— which means that just as the American  People were “assumed” to bind themselves to the new service providers by process of assumption, the U.S. Congress is “assumed” to bind themselves to the provisions of the Federal Code they have published and used as a basis for suing people in courts all over this country.  Anything less results in institutionalized constructive fraud on the part of the members of the U.S. Congress in 1933 and every year since then.]
2.  Senator Harkin: “Since 1933, the people have formed a new unincorporated United States in trust by their silence in accepting the loss of their ability for paying their debts at law.”
[We must immediately ask — “Which ‘people’?  The actual living people of this country, or the invisible fictional “persons” of the Territorial United States?  Because the States and People who actually own this country continued to pay their debts all along and have no reason to believe in the existence of any unwritten or implied “United States” trust.
The bankruptcy in 1933 ruptured the assumed service contract with
“United States of America, Incorporated” and ultimately led to the demise of that corporation in 1999, but so what?  If a subcontractor goes bankrupt the only affect on the Principal is to hire new subcontractors or extend additional duties to already existing subcontractors — which in this case meant, historically, the UNITED STATES, INC. taking over.
 Also, there is no such thing as a totally “unincorporated” trust.  Trusts may be corporate or incorporated, but they have to have substance and form and a written indenture in order to exist.   There are no Zombie Apocalypse States or States of States or Commonwealths in our country or anywhere else.
Senator Harkin’s belief —-if indeed he said all this — that some kind of un-stipulated public trust exists then or now is straight out of the realm of fantasy and has no basis in law or fact.
There are unincorporated state trusts, but they are not some airy-fairy merely “presumed to exist” construct.  Our unincorporated state trusts are formed by declarations, not constitutions.  Those declarations may take different forms — they may be compacts, they may be sovereign letters patent, they may be commonwealth treatises — but they all have definite written hold-in-your-hand provisions that include public trust indentures.  All of them.
Stop a moment and think about what this purported statement by Senator Harkin implies — the members of the U.S. Congress think that our States don’t really exist or have substance, because they are not incorporated?  That’s like denying the existence of chickens because you broke an egg. Our States are the authorities that charter all their States of States and if the members of the U.S. Congress missed that fact in Grammar School, we are all in a heap of trouble.  You cannot ever have a “State of Florida” without first having a “Florida” — does everyone grasp that fact?]
3. Senator Harkin then quotes Russell v. Allen, 107 U.S. 163, 27 L.Ed. 397: “The United States Government may be the trustee of a charitable trust.”
[Well, I “may” act as a fan dancer, too, Senator.  But in the absence of evidence, we cannot presume that I occupied that capacity, can we? Or any other “potential” capacity — dog catcher, soothsayer, or rocket scientist.  I might act as the trustee of a charitable trust, too. Might. Or might not.  This is crazy stuff, right out of Loony-Tunes Central…. The Trust to which the delegated powers return by Operation of Law is and has always been  The United States of America, Unincorporated, which was formed and announced to the public by The Continental Congress, September 9, 1776, and to all the State Trusts functioning under their statehood compacts, letters patent, commonwealth treatises, etc.  If this is not perfectly obvious to the members of the “U.S. Congress” it is still perfectly obvious to the rest of us.]
I literally can’t believe what I just read.  If this two-page statement by Senator Harkin is legitimate, and if this is representative of the level of understanding among members of Congress, our Ship of State has been lost at sea for over a hundred years, captained by pirates and crewed by imbeciles.
And that discussion was just the first paragraph of this statement.  There’s more.  Unfortunately.  But I must stop and draw breath….
Dear Mr. President Trump: there is no need for any vacuous supposition.  The occasion of any service provider going bankrupt results in the delegated powers returning to The United States of America, Unincorporated.  We were not given Notice by the International Trustees that they were unable to make provisions for new service providers (or were incompetent to do so) and in fact, new service providers readily came forward and assumed the service obligations and have been paid for those services since 1868.
You can see that the obligations of contract by assumption swing both ways, and that any failure by the U.S. Congress to recognize this fact (such as their obligation to honor the entire Federal Code so long as they continue to publish and reference it ) results in constructive fraud against the sovereign States and People of this country and is in fact, treason.
On this occasion with the failures of both the corporate Territorial and corporate Municipal service corporations, we have said — “Enough.” and have made public our non-assumption of contract and have also published our acknowledgement and acceptance of the returned Delegated Powers.
It is now your turn to educate the members of Congress about life in the actual world and tell them that there is no implied United States trust charitable or otherwise available for the United States Government to (possibly) administer.  Andrew Jackson sold off the unincorporated United States as a business in 1836 and used the proceeds to pay off all debts owed by The United States of America, Unincorporated.
All variations of “United States” incorporation(s) since that time have been completely foreign operations acting under assumed contracts, both Municipal and Territorial — and aside from being responsible to obey and execute the constitutional agreements they were assuming, never had any authority, business connections, or any other rights, titles, or interests related to this country or its people.
We are now calling for the “Internal Revenue Service” to vacate our shores for lack of valid contract and lack of evidence that any valid Municipal or Territorial PERSONS exist.  We also remind the American Armed Forces that if they want to work for us, they need a new contract.  And as for the “United States” meaning the British Territorial United States and Municipal United States — we are your Priority Creditors, and that is set in cement.
Finally, as for the Office of the “US Attorney General” —that whole mess needs to be straightened out along with dismissal of any claims that Americans “voluntarily” donated their babies as chattel “alien property” — ASAP.  Thank you, very much.
—————————-
See this article and over 1300 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Anna Von Reitz – ANNOUNCEMENTS –TAKE NOTICE!!!! CALL TO ACTION – SOLUTIONS

Picture

ANNOUNCEMENTS –TAKE NOTICE!!!!
From Anna Von Reitz
As of the first week of October 2017 the Municipal UNITED STATES ceased functioning.
Attempts to replace it with a UN Corp “Regional Government” have thus far been successfully rebuffed and prevented.

That leaves us to deal with the Territorial United States government, which is controlled
by the military and has substantially different rules and procedures than the old Muni
government.

As a result some of the recommendations I have made to people in the past either no
longer apply or require tweaking to make them work in this altered scenario.

Those who got their paperwork done and in before October 2017 are grandfathered in
and have their records established via the old Muni process.

They have to be recognized as civilians.
Those who didn’t do this have to follow a different process which has yet to be negotiated
to the same ends– correction of the public record, reclaiming ownership of your
Name/NAMES, and recognition of your civilian status with respect to the military
government.

The criminals in charge have made a great hash of things.
It will require a lot of effort to correct and some confusion is unavoidable.

Just remember the key points — you are no kind of “citizen” but are a civilian non-combatant “national”.

Make use of all means to establish public claim of your Names/NAMES as of your actual
birthday.

This can be accomplished by publication in newspapers, sealed registered mail
record copies, Certificates of Assumed Names, formal name changes followed by
Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-Conveyance of Deed and Title to the land and soil
of your birth state recorded with the local Land Recording Office.

A Corrected Deed to your Name and Estate –land, etc., can be used to the same effect.
Whatever means and route you use to claim back your Name and Estate, it will be
necessary to begin carrying copies of paperwork with you, ready to produce as part of
your identification process.


URGENT NOTE FROM ANNA:
The most urgent thing people need to do besides cleaning up their own political status records is organize their county and state jural assemblies. The national level quorum is growing and will soon be able to redress grievances at a national level.

HOW TO FIND PEOPLE IN YOUR AREA

The National Assembly Thursday night conference call is at nine o’clock p.m., EST, 1-712-770-4160, access code 226823#. First hour is assembly roll call and business. The second hour is general chat and education.

For those who have not participated in your county and state assembly but want to participate please send an email to contentmanager1@yahoo.com with your state in the subject line. You will be connected with your state coordinator.

The national assembly has a full website and forums packed with history and information. You are welcome to register and participate.

National Assembly Website: https://national-assembly.net/
National Assembly Forums: http://forums.national-assembly.net/
DeFacto to DeJure handbook: http://national-assembly.net/index.php/handbook

The old website 1stmichiganassembly.net and the hotline phone number are now obsolete and no longer used. The Michigan General Jural Assembly created and supported the national level assembly website and conference call for the people to return to self governing.

Mr. Trump is doing the best he can with a bad situation.
Our country as a whole is indeed facing an emergency of sorts.

Now more than ever it is
imperative that those born in this country claim their names and their natural political
status and organize their county jural assemblies.
There is not a moment to waste.

Your destiny and the destiny of your country depends on your willingness to set the records straight and organize the local county government you are owed.

Assistance is available from the Michigan General Jural Assembly.
In addition, given the history and the current state of affairs, it seems only prudent for
people to make the effort to set aside emergency stocks of food, fuel, water and yes,
some silver coinage.

I am now and will continue to benefit somewhat if you decide to make use of the Mint
Builder opportunity offered by Paul to acquire some silver, but the real benefit may be to
you and to your families to get serious about a moderate amount of preparation for
possible disruptions.

At present there is no better or other option on the table than to fall back to using gold for
international transactions and silver for domestic purchases.

I am hopeful that we will get through the woods and be able to ultimately outgrow our
belief in money and be able to transition to a more enlightened system of value soon but,
until then, a transition via the old gold and silver standard is in my opinion likely to
happen.
annavonreitz.com/takenotice.pdf
—————————-
See this article and over 800 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website

ATTENTION DEBT SLAVES! INDEMNIFY YOURSELF FROM US INC BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!

 

TO EXPLAIN AN INDEMNITY AGREEMENT, IT IS FIRST NECESSARY TO DEFINE THE TERM “INDEMNITY.”


RETIRED JUDGE SPILLS THE BEANS- BY JUDGE DALE


INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

 Business Law & Taxes
By Jean Murray
Updated February 11, 2017To explain an indemnity agreement, it is first necessary to define the term “indemnity.” Indemnity is defined as “a duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another (Black’s Law Dictionary). Indemnity has the general meaning of “hold harmless;” that is, one party holds the other harmless for some loss or damage. Some variations of meaning for therm “indemnity:”

  • Indemnity can also refer to compensation for loss or damage from the actions of another party
  • And indemnity can also be described as a legal exemption from loss or damages, as in the case of an indemnity clause in a contract.

What Type of Business Would Use an Indemnity Agreement?The most common case of a business that has indemnity agreements is in construction. But any business with employees may want those employees to sign an indemnity agreement to protect against employee lawsuits.
Rental car companies also use indemnity agreements to protect against lawsuits from accidents involving rental car drivers.
Indemnity Agreements and Dangerous Activities Businesses that offer somewhat dangerous activities to the public (skiing, para-sailing, amusement park rides) require that the members of the public sign an indemnity agreement releasing the business from liability in case of an accident. In reality, if the business is found to be negligent (faulty equipment, poor maintenance), the individual who was injured still has a claim against the company.
An indemnity agreement (sometimes called a “hold harmless agreement” can be a contract or a section of a contract. In these cases, an indemnity agreement is contract language that indemnifies (holds harmless) one of the parties in a contract for specific actions that might cause damage to the other party.
Examples of Indemnity Agreements

  • A kennel may want an indemnity agreement in a contract with a pet owner to keep the kennel from being sued for damage caused by the owner’s pet to other pets. I this case, the pet owner is being asked to indemnify the kennel owner (to hold the kennel owner harmless) for damages caused by the pet.
  • Indemnity clauses are often found in intellectual property licensing agreements.
  • In another general example, a landlord may require a tenant to sign a “hold harmless” clause in a rental agreement, agreeing that the landlord is not responsible for damages caused by the tenant’s negligence.

In each of these cases and many others, Party A must be persuaded to sign a contract which could cause him or her to be sued. So, Party B is being required to indemnify Party A, so the contract can be signed.
Types of Indemnity Agreements Indemnity agreements are found commonly in construction contracts. In this context, there are several types:

  • Broad form indemnity agreements, ​also called “no fault” agreements, have been common in construction contracts where all loss is placed on the sub-contractors. Many states have declared this type of indemnity agreement to be illegal.
  • Limited indemnity agreements state that the subcontractor pays for all damages caused by the subcontractor’s own negligence. This type of indemnity agreement still places a heavy burden on the subcontractor.
  • Comparative form agreements or clauses are based on the common law principle that negligence is based on actions over which the actor has complete control.

Typical Parts of an Indemnity Agreement The specific form of an indemnity agreement varies by state law. This is a general overview of what you might find in an indemnity agreement.
The two parties will be described:

  • The Indemnitee – the person wanting protection
  • The Indemnifier – the person promising (warranting) to minimize harm to the indemnitee

The agreement may describe consideration (usually a sum of money) that will be used to secure the agreement.
The agreement will state the specific terms under which the indemnitee will be held harmless. This is fairly complicated legal language.
Exclusions to the agreement will be described. One common exclusion is negligence or fault of the indemnitee.
That is, if the indemnitee can be shown to be negligent, the indemnification doesn’t work (the indemnitee is at fault and can be sued).

A claims process will described, including when a claim must be filed and the limits to the claim.
The agreement wills state who has the burden of proof; usually the indemnifier must prove that the claim is not appropriate.

These are the main parts to an indemnification agreement, mostly procedural.

Source www.thebalance.com/indemnity-agreement-398294

Pay Attention! — If You Want to Save Your Butts!

The Top Ten Articles for Rapid Assistance

The Indemnity Bond and Court Process — Step by Step

Emergency Review About “Money”

Picture

INDEMNITY, INDEMNIFICATION, AND INDEMNIFY

By Jean Murray
Updated September 09, 2016
www.thebalance.com/the-concept-of-indemnity-in-business-contracts-398295What is Indemnity? The principles described in the terms “indemnity” and “indemnify” are interrelated so these terms are defined and explained together.
Indemnity is defined as “a duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” (Black’s Law Dictionary). The term comes from a  late Middle English word meaning “unhurt, free from loss.”
Indemnify and and Indemnification
To indemnify someone is to absolve that person from responsibility for damage or loss arising from a transaction.
(Black’s Law Dictionary).
Indemnification is the act of not being held liable for or being protected from harm, loss, or damages, by shifting the liability to another party.
Indemnity – Variations in Meaning Indemnity also includes an understanding that an injured party has a right to claim reimbursement or compensation for a loss or damage against the person who has the duty. This concept is seen often in civil lawsuits relating to negligence claims.
Indemnity refer in some contexts as compensation for loss or damage from the actions of another party.
Indemnity can also refer to a legal exemption from loss or damages, as in the case of an indemnity clause in a contract, in which one party agrees to take the liability for loss or damage from another party. In this case, indemnity has the general meaning of “hold harmless.”
Indemnity and Hold Harmless Agreements and State Laws
An indemnity agreement is sometimes called a hold harmless agreement, because it is an attempt to make sure that one party does not attempt to sue another party for negligence.At present, 42 states have some kind of state laws that limit the inclusion of indemnity clauses or agreements. While indemnity agreements are a protection against lawsuits, they don’t allow compensation for loss or damage.
Even where these clauses are not restricted, courts have held that indemnity clauses must be expressed in “clear and unequivocal terms” (Maine) or, “very clearly intended” (Nevada).

Indemnity and ContractsIndemnity usually arises in contracts, either as a separate indemnity agreement or as an indemnity clause in a contract. This language is included in cases where there is a possibility of loss or damage to one party during the term of, or arising from the circumstances of, the contract. The right to indemnity and the duty to indemnify ordinarily stem from a contractual agreement, which generally protects against liability, loss, or damage.
Uses of Indemnity Agreements in Business
Indemnity in construction contracts. Indemnity clauses or agreements in construction contracts are an attempt to protect the contractor from lawsuits and losses due to negligence. Some states
Indemnity and Insurance
One of the best examples of indemnity is insurance, which an insurance company indemnifies a property owner from losses or damage to that property. The business owner basically transfers the risk of having to pay for negligence to the insurance company.
In another example, business owners may buy indemnity insurance for professional liability. Allena Tapia, Guide to Freelance Writing, explains how the concept of indemnity insurance can protect freelance writers.
Examples: Here is an example of an indemnity clause in a contract:
“I hereby release, acquit and discharge [company] and its agents and employees from any liability arising from any circumstance including the negligence of [company] or its employees.

Confiscating the customer deposits in Cyprus banks was not a one-off. It could happen here.