Climate Alarmist, PhD Physicist David Appell Fails Freshman Physics… Misunderstands Climate-Critical Evaporation — Iowa Climate Science Education

A comment by PhD physicist David Appell, a contributing writer to Scientific American and Nature, shows he does not understand the fundamental climate-driving mechanism of water evaporation in a recent comment. Amazon rain forest still exists despite very warm, year-round temperatures. Image cropped: NASA Many readers are familiar with climate alarm dogmatist David Appell. He […]

via Climate Alarmist, PhD Physicist David Appell Fails Freshman Physics… Misunderstands Climate-Critical Evaporation — Iowa Climate Science Education

Europe’s Green Suicide: Eleven Million Jobs At Risk From EU Green Deal, Trade Unions Warn — Iowa Climate Science Education

The European Green Deal risks deepening economic and social divisions between east and western EU countries, trade unions say, warning the 27-member bloc risks imploding before it reaches its 2050 climate neutrality goal. 11 million jobs in extractive industries, energy intensive industries and in the automotive industry are potentially directly affected by the EU’s new […]

via Europe’s Green Suicide: Eleven Million Jobs At Risk From EU Green Deal, Trade Unions Warn — Iowa Climate Science Education

EPA clarifies secret science proposal — Iowa Climate Science Education

EPA clarifies secret science proposal EPA has responded to the squealing from the junk science crowd about the science transparency proposal issued in 2018. The good news is that the rulemaking is on track to be finalized soon. The media release is below. […]

via EPA clarifies secret science proposal — Iowa Climate Science Education

State of the Polar Bear Report 2019: Are polar bear researchers hiding good news? — Iowa Climate Science Education

International Polar Bear Day is a good day to ask: Are polar bear researchers hiding good news? Extended lags in publishing polar bear counts and a failure to publish data on female polar bear body weights and cub survival in Western Hudson Bay for more than 25 years make it look like polar bear researchers […]

via State of the Polar Bear Report 2019: Are polar bear researchers hiding good news? — Iowa Climate Science Education

No raw data, no science: another possible source of the reproducibility crisis — Iowa Climate Science Education

From Molecular Brain, Biomedical Central Molecular Brain volume 13, Article number: 24 (2020) Cite this article Abstract A reproducibility crisis is a situation where many scientific studies cannot be reproduced. Inappropriate practices of science, such as HARKing, p-hacking, and selective reporting of positive results, have been suggested as causes of irreproducibility. In this editorial, I […]

via No raw data, no science: another possible source of the reproducibility crisis — Iowa Climate Science Education

Bankers JP Morgan Warn of “Catastrophic” Climate Change — Iowa Climate Science Education

Guest essay by Eric Worrall JP Morgan wants the world to act on climate change – but critics claim they are still “funding fossil fuel”. JP Morgan economists warn of ‘catastrophic’ climate change By Tom EspinerBusiness reporter, BBC News … In a hard-hitting report to clients, the economists said that without action being taken there […]

via Bankers JP Morgan Warn of “Catastrophic” Climate Change — Iowa Climate Science Education

No Raw Data, No Science — Iowa Climate Science Education

Like it says. The media release is below. The paper is here. ### How a ‘no raw data, no science’ outlook can resolve the reproducibility crisis in science FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY When we look for reliable sources of information, we turn to studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. But in some cases, researchers find […]

via No Raw Data, No Science — Iowa Climate Science Education

Non-intergovernmental International Panel On Climate Change [NIPCC]

Climate change reconsidered

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change. Because we are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, we are able to look at evidence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ignores. Because we do not work for any governments, we are not biased toward the assumption that greater government activity is necessary.

NIPCC traces its roots to a meeting in Milan in 2003 organized by the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), a nonprofit research and education organization based in Arlington, Virginia. SEPP, in turn, was founded in 1990 by Dr. S. Fred Singer, an atmospheric physicist, and incorporated in 1992 following Dr. Singer’s retirement from the University of Virginia. NIPCC is currently a joint project of SEPP, The Heartland Institute, and the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.

NIPCC has produced 14 reports to date:

  • Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate
  • Climate Change Reconsidered: The 2009 Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC)
  • Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report
  • Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science
  • Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts
  • Scientific Critique of IPCC’s 2013 ‘Summary for Policymakers’
  • Commentary and Analysis on the Whitehead & Associates 2014 NSW Sea-Level Report
  • Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming
  • Written Evidence Submitted to the Commons Select Committee of the United Kingdom Parliament
  • NIPCC vs. IPCC
  • Chinese Translation of Climate Change Reconsidered
  • Global Warming Surprises: Temperature data in dispute can reverse conclusions about human influence on climate
  • Data versus Hype: How Ten Cities Show
    Sea-level Rise Is a False Crisis
  • Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels

SOURCE and thanks to Judy for finding

Cult of Climate Change … the time bomb is ticking


Delingpole: Sorry, Gove, But Americans Don’t Accept Your Climate Obsession — Iowa Climate Science Education

Unilaterally decarbonising it — as seems to be Boris Johnson’s and Michael Gove’s wizard plane — must surely count among the most suicidally pointless plan ever devised by any government in history, especially by one wearing the ‘Conservative’ tag. Michael Gove – the most powerful figure in the UK government after Boris Johnson – has […]

via Delingpole: Sorry, Gove, But Americans Don’t Accept Your Climate Obsession — Iowa Climate Science Education

An End to Paul Ehrlich — The Battle of Memes

By Anna Von Reitz

What is a meme?  It is a popular idea or belief expressed as a phrase or very simple idea, passed around from hand to hand and mouth to mouth like the Common Cold.
Some advertising slogans become memes, like the immortal “Where’s the beef?” ad the escaped the realm of fast food burger joint competitions and made the Big Leagues in national politics.
More commonly, memes take on the form of popular Old Wives’ Tales, Urban Myths, and Superstitions — some of which can be, and are, used for political and propaganda purposes.
Who is Paul Ehrlich?  Answer: a Stanford University Professor with bad math skills.
What is Paul Ehrlich famous for?  Writing a book called, “The Population Bomb” back in the late 1960’s, in which he used flawed mathematical models to prove — ahem! — that we were headed for an inescapable planetary crisis due to overpopulation of the planet, and predicting that if we didn’t reduce ourselves to voluntary celibacy, hair shirts, and eating wheat grass and dirt, all would be lost by the 1980’s.
Let me check my watch…. 2020….still here.
Nonetheless, these pernicious ideas and false claims remain and have not only attained the status of an Urban Myth, but have offered the planetary elites a ploy that they wish to parley into a brand new and ever-more oppressive regulatory and taxation system: The New Green Deal, complete with “Carbon Taxes”, and presumably a little Personal Smart Meter designed to tax you for every breath you take and every fart you dare pass.
So whether you are simply math-challenged and unobservant, or whether you are nasty and cynical and looking for a new scam to milk, the overpopulation hysteria continues long after it should have been pronounced dead and buried, together with collateral theories of the same ilk that continue to cause problems.
This recent round of “semi-plausible scientific bunk” all began with Paul Ehrlich and his thoroughly discredited “population bomb” hysteria back in the 1970’s.
This parallels another thoroughly discredited theory — I speak of the now (suddenly) “accepted” Green House Gas Theory, which appeared on the scene 196 years ago, was discredited even back then as nonsense flying in the face of The Second Law of Thermodynamics— and should have remained in the scrap heap of scientific speculations that didn’t pan out —- EXCEPT that certain parties revived it for political, not scientific, reasons.
I speak here of the Democratic Party, which made funding of “scientific” research subject to political pandering and objectives, and made University budgets the playground of “allied interests” —- defense contractors, Big Pharma, the AMA, and so on.
Does everyone reading this realize that carbon dioxide makes up exactly 1/300th of one percent of the atmosphere?  
Can you repeat that fact after me, ad nauseum, so that even a pre-schooler can recite the Opposing Meme —? 
Carbon dioxide accounts for 1/300th of one percent of the atmosphere.  
It can’t possibly cause “global warming” and human-caused increases in the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide can’t do anything, either.  
So all this hysteria and all these proposed “carbon taxes” are just more Shinola that is being manipulated by certain elitists who are hoping to set up yet another long run for themselves as Masters of the Masses and Lords of the Manor, and all based on “popular” Bunk. 
Population bomb  — bunk.
Greenhouse Gas Theory — bunk since 1824, no less.
Carbon Taxes — grossly self-interested bunk.
Fact: Enzymes and poisons are the only things that are effective Change Agents at concentrations of one three-hundredth of one percent per volume of anything.
So unless carbon dioxide is an enzyme……
Which brings me to my final point.  Poisonous ideas and beliefs often cause more damage and misery far in excess of anything actual and factual in this world.
Fear, prejudice, falsehoods, greed, self-interest, and outright lies “pre-cause” the damage that is played out in real time, and false beliefs lead to wrong actions nearly a hundred percent of the time.
Faced with the enormity of the biologic and environmental catastrophe that the Vatican’s policy of supporting Chemtrail spraying programs has wrought in California, Alaska, and Australia, stumbling Apologists have told me, “We had no idea!  We were told by reputable scientists…..”
“Reputable scientists” who were working for manufacturing industries anxious to get rid of their wastes at a premium price, “reputable scientists” who were covertly working for violent political factions, “reputable scientists” who were threatened with loss of tenure or funding, or sopped with promises of same.
The days when we could regard science as a Second Religion and scientists as trustworthy priests, are long since gone.  The Democratic Party and the Military-Industrial Complex have done their work of corruption both inside and outside the realm of the Vatican Expense Accounts.
It’s high time we all woke up and elbowed our less educated neighbors in the ribs and clued them in — hey, this is just a con job.
This overpopulation hysteria and human-caused climate change bunk isn’t true.
It’s being used as an excuse to tax you for the “crime” of being alive and making a living.  It’s another form of “income tax” designed to tax your life, your time on earth, and your labor.  Carbon taxes are just another bid to enslave you and an excuse to rule the world, being offered by the same old charlatans who are responsible for the present Mess.
It’s time to shove it all back down the throats of the Democratic Party Hacks, the Archbishops and Cardinals, the Committee of Rome, Michael Bloomberg, the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, various ill-informed Scandinavian teenagers, the United Nations, Paul Ehrlich, Prince Philip, the Holy See, the Federal Reserve Bank Board of Governors, and all the Closet Nazis worldwide.
I want to see them weeping green goo and staring at each other in horror and saying things like, “My Lucifer, I don’t believe it…. the horses are talking and the sheep are waking up! Demons preserve us!”   I want to notice their conspicuous absence from public forums and podiums and news cycles.  I want them caught-out, shamed, recognized as the self-interested liars that they are.  I want to see them all scattering like cockroaches before a very bright light —- and off the academic gravy train, too.
Can you picture all the thick-carpet people in the world wide-eyed, deflated, and in a huff?  All the outrageous lies that have driven the Mainstream Media for years now, nailed to the barn door with only six words?
You, too, can do your part in the Battle of Memes. Spread the actual scientific truth and let it fly and land upon darkened, fearful minds, like so many embers and sparks of an engrossing fire:
“One three-hundredth of one percent.”
See this article and over 2200 others on Anna’s website here: