Repeal county PHE kill box law ’emergency operations plans’ and withdraw from county-state and county-federal kill box contracts.

KATHERINE WATT

APR 30, 2024

Share

Orientation for new readers.

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program

Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law


A reader emailed me asking about whether I’ve written templates for repeal and nullification of county-level public health emergency (PHE) laws and legal instruments (contracts).

Yesterday, my friend Sasha Latypova’s posted her response to a Reuters ‘fact-checker.’

Sasha wrote:

…my hypothesis that Air BnB’s email was indicative or their (or their insurance providers’) realization that the governments of many countries have given themselves authority to interfere with lawful international travel under false pretenses of public health and climate threats is based on the following legal history in the US (this is only a brief summary, for details see the link below):

  • Emergency-predicated centralization of government authority within the federal executive branch has a long history in the United States. Examples of Congressional acts signed by US Presidents to consolidate executive power in response to circumstances construed as national emergencies include the Trading with the Enemy Act (1917), Emergency Banking Act (1933), Reorganization Act (1939), Public Health Service Act (1944), War Powers Resolution (1973), National Emergencies Act (1976), Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), PATRIOT Act (2001), Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act (2002), Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act (2002), Homeland Security Act (2002). 
  • Executive legislation has also been enacted to expand executive emergency power, taking the form of executive orders and agency regulations published in the Federal Register. Many US states have also enacted state-level general emergency management laws, mostly during and since the 1970s. In 2001, public health lawyers affiliated with Johns Hopkins University, Georgetown University and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA). The MSEHPA was drafted to further override constitutional separation of powers and centralize state-level executive authority on public health emergency predicates, including communicable disease outbreaks. The ensuing lobbying campaign drew momentum from false-flag anthrax attacks in September 2001. Several related model acts are in circulation, including the Model State Public Health Privacy Act (1999); Model State Public Health Act (2003) and Uniform Emergency Volunteer Health Practitioners Act (2007). 
  • These model acts, combined with deception campaigns providing false information to federal and state lawmakers and the public about biological threats, biodefense, biosecurity, bioterrorism, emerging infectious diseases and related topics, have been used to lobby state lawmakers to expand government authority to apprehend, detain, injure and kill people and seize private property during declared public health emergencies. Since 2001, state legislatures and governors have updated and amended state legal codes to enact many provisions of the MSEHPA.
  • Since January 2020, federal and state public health, military and law enforcement officials have demonstrably used federal and state public health emergency laws to commit acts of fraud, extortion, theft, torture, homicide, and other crimes, by characterizing Covid-19 as a global pandemic of a life-threatening communicable disease, and by characterizing criminal acts as components of a lawful, coordinated, necessary, life-saving government emergency response program. Under existing federal and state laws, fraudulent, non-validated government claims about the existence, transmissibility and virulence of communicable disease pathogens form the legal basis for government declarations, determinations, executive orders, expenditures, policies and programs. 
  • Under existing federal and state laws, fraudulent, non-validated diagnostic tests form the legal basis for government acts to classify, apprehend, detain and treat tested persons as public health threats, as ‘asymptomatic,’ ‘precommunicable,’ or symptomatic carriers of non-validated communicable disease pathogens. Note: Presidential Executive Order 13295, as amended by EO 13375, 13674 and 14047, currently in force under 42 USC 264, classifies non-specific respiratory diseases as “quarantinable” diseases, including “Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled” and “influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.” 
  • Under existing federal and state laws, fraudulent, non-validated data about the safety, efficacy, purity, potency and sterility of drugs, devices and biological products form the legal basis for government officials to contract with pharmaceutical companies to develop, manufacture, purchase and deploy emergency “medical countermeasures” used to intentionally injure and kill recipients. Federal and state government acts legalized by public health emergency laws include but are not limited to issuance of public health emergency declarations, determinations and executive orders; establishment of fraudulent diagnostic testing programs and epidemiological ‘dashboards;’ imposition of school and business occupancy limitations and closures; mask mandates; hospital homicide protocols (sedation, dehydration and starvation); and military-pharmaceutical homicide protocols (vaccine mandates). Public health law, and especially civil and criminal liability exemptions under the Defense Production Act (1950), “Good Samaritan” laws, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (1986), and the PREP Act (2005), have given public health and military officials, manufacturers and regulators of biological products, drugs and devices, pharmacists, nurses, doctors, school administrators, public and private employers and other individuals, license to kill.

For more information on how the government can legally interrupt your travel, detain and kill you under fabricated excuse of a public health emergency, I invite you to read my colleague Katherine Watt’s publication, Bailiwick News:

Continue: https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/repeal-county-phe-kill-box-law-emergency?r=1qpmbr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Telecom’s Weaponized 5G Caught in the Act While we Sleep

For the past eight years, I have been a vocal advocate against the unnecessary and dangerous expansion of 5G networks in my community and nationwide. As a concerned citizen and activist, I have faced significant opposition and criticism for my stance on this critical issue.

Here, I am testifying in 2017 before the California Assembly against the proliferation of 5G throughout California:

Shocking NIH Evidence! Food Supply is Being Contaminated with mRNA ‘Viruses’

“My fear about this bioweapon attack, which is what it is, is that they could release a chimeric weaponized ‘virus’ on US and global citizens through our food and water supply.”

KAREN KINGSTON

APR 10, 2024

Share

April 10, 2024More than 2 years ago, on March 17, 2022, on Brannon Howse live I broke the news that mRNA ‘vaccine technology’ was not only being put into our food supply, but also being produced by plants.

MIT Research On Nanoelectronic Devices Creating New Paradigms For Life-Machine Symbiosis And Academic Connections To The Global Technocratic Transhumanist Web

ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD

APR 29, 2024

Share

Greedy opportunists takes control of ‘our climate future’ with wind turbines running on oil

The art of profiting from the “climate crisis” with Qatari oil money, while appearing to be benevolent planetary stewards

JACOB NORDANGÅRD

APR 28, 2024

Share

One of the major players in setting up a new global governance regime is the American “non-partisan” think-tank Stimson Center. It was founded in 1989 with the stated goal to “enhance global peace”. Stimson does, however, seem to be on a mission for world conquest on behalf of the global corporatocracy using the “climate crisis” as a weapon.

Henry Stimson (1867-1950), US Secretary of War 1940-45

The name is taken from Henry Stimson, US Secretary of War during the Second World War. A lawyer to J.P. Morgan, and a protege of Elihu Root (the founding chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations), that oversaw the development of the A-bomb with the aid from the Rockefeller lawyer John McCloy (Assistant Secretary of War 1941-45).

Their agenda is a continuation of the work that was initiated by Andrew Carnegie and Elihu Root at the beginning of the 20th century and which led up to the creation of the League of Nations in 1920 and the United Nations in 1945.

The founders Barry Blechman and Michael Krepon were members of the Council on Foreign Relations and had previously been involved with Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Brookings Institution. Initial funding came from the Carnegie Corporation and the Ford Foundation. Carnegie still remains the largest donor, with the US Department of Defense second (2022).

Stimson Center - YouTube

Stimson are now on a holy mission to upgrade the global system, and runs the Global Governance, Justice & Security Program for this very purpose. The program aims to:

…advance more capable global and regional institutions to better cope with existing and emerging global challenges and to create new opportunities through effective multilateral action, including with the global business community and civil society.

It is safe to say that it is the global corporatocracy that will benefit the most from their climate crusade.

The program builds directly on the recommendations from the Albright-Gambari Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance’s report Confronting the Crisis in Global Governance, that was supported by The Hague Institute for Global Justice and the Stimson Center, and launched at Andrew Carnegies Peace Palace in The Hague on 16 June 2016.

The Peace Palace was built with money donated from Andrew Carnegie and is managed and maintained by the Carnegie Foundation in the Netherlands. It opened 28 August 1913.

Two of the projects included in the Global Governance, Justice & Security Program are the Climate Governance Commission and the Global Governance Innovation Network. Both of which work to improve the international global governance architecture by building partnerships with actors who can benefit from the proposed solutions.

These projects are especially involved in this years UN Summit of the Future and the Pact for the Future (with its mission to turbocharge the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development). I give the background in my lecture UN Leader’s Pact for the Future: A Planetary Emergency.

Funding to the projects has been obtained from multiple sources, including the Swedish Global Challenges Foundation and the State of Qatar. The small and incredibly rich oil country was actually the third largest contributor to Stimson in 2022.

Qatar became a British protectorate in 1916, and developed close ties with the US after Qatar’s independence from Britain in 1971. The country hosts the largest US military base in the Middle East, Al-Udeid Air Force Base, with 11,000 US military personnel, and became a Major Non-NATO Ally in 2022. The military base functions as a “major staging ground for air operations against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria”. Qatar participated in the 2011 military intervention in Libya.

But they also have ties with Iran and Hamas. Qatar is one of the largest donors to Hamas, and has hosted their headquarters since 2012. The total payments to Hamas exceeds 1.8 billion dollars and has been transferred monthly in consultation with the U.S. and Israeli governments! The support has been questioned after the 7 October attack but their headquarters will, according to Qatar authorities, remain in Doha as long as “their presence remains beneficial to mediation”.

Qatar ruler, Hamas chief discuss reconstruction of Gaza
Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani (R) meets Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau Ismail Haniyeh (2nd L), in Doha, Qatar on May 23, 2021. ( Qatari Emirate Council—Anadolu Agency )

Global power politics has its own logic, with enemies created and weaponised by the same forces that opposes and combats them. The arms manufacturers are always the winners, regardless of the outcome of a conflict.

The same logic can be applied to climate policy. The country that possesses the third largest natural gas reserves in the world and is the world’s largest carbon emitter per capita, is one of the contributors to the Climate Governance Commission through Qatar Foundations Erthna Center for a Sustainable Future!

The oil fields in Qatar were developed in the middle of the 1930s by the Petroleum Department of Qatar, consisting of British Petroleum (23.75%), Royal Dutch Shell (23.75%), Cie Francaise des Petroles (TotalEnergies) (23.75%), Standard Oil of New Jersey (11.87%), Mobil (11.87%), and Paratex (Glubenkian Foundation) (5.0%).1 It is no wonder the Qatar Peninsula has been in need of “protection” from the British and US military!

The annual Doha Forum is an example on the close cooperation that has developed between the authoritarian Middle East monarchy and the Stimson Center. The forum has been arranged in the Qatari capital since 2001 with the aim to “discuss critical challenges facing the world.” This literary means to highlight crises that creates opportunities for the global business community. Speakers attending in 2023 were UN Secretary General António Guterres and WEF President Børge Brende.

Stimson publishes the Doha Forum Reports together with Qatar Foundation’s The Global Institute for Strategic Researchand are deeply involved in setting the agenda.

Maja Groff, Convener of Climate Governance Commission

The Climate Governance Commission’s convener Maja Groff (a lawyer who has been a teacher at the Hague Academy of International Law in Carnegie’s Peace Palace) discussed the commission’s findings from the report Governing our Planetary Emergency during the session “Governing our Climate Future” in December 2023.

Qatar’s climate commitments clearly has other goals than killing the goose that lays their golden eggs. Oil and gas account for more than 70% of total government revenue. As a major financier of European wind power they can cash in on delivering the needed regulatory power (Liquified Natural Gas), especially in the wake of the sanctions against Russia and the “interruption” of their gas supplies to Europe.2 Qatar Petroleum has partnered with LNG-pioneers ExxonMobil (formerly Standard Oil of New Jersey and Standard Oil of New York) to develop the North Field, the world’s largest non-associated natural gas field.3 Bye bye to Nord Stream and welcome North Field!

The Qatar Investment Authority, that manages the countries oil and natural gas surpluses, is part of a strategic partnership with the Spanish Iberdrola Group. A leading developer of wind energy. This is all about creating business opportunities and make profitable investments. Ahmed Al-Hammadi (WEF Young Global Leader 2019) serves as QIA’s Chief Investment Office for Europe and “leads on the fund’s sustainability approach”.4 QIA also happens to invests in Russia, and owns 19% of the oil giant Rosneft.5

CONTINUE: https://open.substack.com/pub/drjacobnordangard/p/greedy-opportunists-takes-control?r=1qpmbr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

States Move to Reject WHO Treaty, Federal Health Diktats

‘Nullification is not revolt, all it is is ignoring: We’re taking a position that we are going to ignore this edict,’ said Tennessee state Rep. Bud Hulsey.

MERYL NASS

APR 28, 2024

Share

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/states-move-to-reject-who-treaty-federal-health-diktats-5635764

States Move to Reject WHO Treaty, Federal Health Diktats
Protesters gather for a rally the L.A. City Council’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for city employees and contractors in Los Angeles on Nov. 8, 2021. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

By Kevin Stocklin

4/25/2024

At a time when governments and global organizations are seeking additional powers to deal with pandemics or other catastrophes, a burgeoning effort is rising in opposition to defend local autonomy and personal liberties.

Next month, member nations of the World Health Organization (WHO) are gathering to grant the agency vast new powers during “health emergencies.”

Meanwhile, some state lawmakers are attempting to wrest back control of health issues to their states and their citizens. And although their success has been mixed, they say they’re in it for the long haul.

“We’re almost to a place in this country that the federal government has trampled on the sovereignty of states for so long that in peoples’ minds, they have no options,” Tennessee state Rep. Bud Hulsey told The Epoch Times.

“It’s like whatever the federal government says is the supreme law of the land, and it’s not,” he said. “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”

A series of Supreme Court decisions, perhaps most notably the 1984 ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, have given ever-increasing power and autonomy to federal agencies to make laws, despite lawmaking authority being vested in Congress and state legislatures.

Related Stories

Swiss Attorney Exposes WHO’s New Pandemic Treaty and Health Regulations

4/22/2024

Swiss Attorney Exposes WHO’s New Pandemic Treaty and Health Regulations

Amidst Growing Resistance, the WHO Turns Up Heat on Members to Sign Pandemic Treaty

4/7/2024

Amidst Growing Resistance, the WHO Turns Up Heat on Members to Sign Pandemic Treaty

The current Supreme Court has taken some steps to rein in the administrative state, including the landmark decision in West Virginia v. EPA, ruling that federal agencies can’t assume powers that Congress didn’t explicitly give them.

And federal courts eventually ruled against Biden administration mandates that forced Americans to don masks and inject experimental mRNA vaccines.

States Fight ‘Medical Authoritarianism’

CONTINUE: https://open.substack.com/pub/merylnass/p/states-move-to-reject-who-treaty?r=1qpmbr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web