International Public Notice: A Source of Misunderstanding

 By Anna Von Reitz

Puerto Rico is and has long been counted among the United States Territories and Possessions, but it is still a British Commonwealth.  

And the people of Puerto Rico have repeatedly refused to enter the Union as a State, when this matter has been brought to a vote. 

How, you might wonder, is such a situation possible?  

In the same way that Canada was accorded equal status with Great Britain, and at the same time retained as a British Colony.  

Great Britain itself is a Company, a realm made of paper, inhabiting a foreign and legal jurisdiction apart from the associated land mass, and in the same way “Canada” as defined by the Statute of Westminster issued December 11th, 1931, is in the same papery realm as Great Britain — as evidenced by the fact that this declaration of equal status is invoked by Roman Statute, not British Law. 

So, it is better to say that “Canada” was made equal to Great Britain, but not equal to England, Ireland, Scotland, or Wales.  

No wonder people — including the Brits themselves — are confused.  

Puerto Rico offers a similar situation. Originally part of the Spanish Empire, later taken over by Britain, it remains a British Commonwealth with Spanish Law. Yet, it is considered a United States Territory, because the settlement with Britain over its direct part in the so-called American Civil War required the relinquishment of “all territorial rights in perpetuity” according to the Treaty of Washington. 

Thus the “territorial” part of Puerto Rico was acquired by the United States, but its land mass remains part of the British Commonwealth and its legal system retains the Spanish Law of the Inquisition. 

This situation has resulted in Puerto Rico being (and remaining) an odd hybrid of Spanish, British, and American influences, with its government split in ownership and self-interest. 

Many people are not aware that while the British Territorial Federal Subcontractor doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, fought on the side of the Northern States-of-States in the Civil War Conflict (for Mercenary Conflict it was), Britain itself openly supported the Confederate States (that is, States-of-States) of America — the Southern component of that great struggle. 

Here is a very succinct recount of what happened, taken from a dissertation, “Alberta Has The Sovereign Right to Issue and Use Its Own Credit” by R. Rogers Smith, issued in 1937: 

“Great Britain had not only assisted the Confederacy from 1861 to 1865, but had
joined in a conspiracy with France, Spain and Austria to divide North America between
them. 

On October 31st, 1861 a convention was held in London attended by delegates from England, France and Spain ; they agreed to a joint intervention in Mexican affairs. 

Emperor Maximilian, brother of Franz Joseph of Austria, was to be placed on the throne of Mexico, (while) Louisiana, which extended at the time from the Gulf of Mexico to the Canadian border, was to be returned to France. The Northern States were to be defeated and returned to England as Colonies. The Confederacy was to be free and retain their slaves.

Great Britain floated the bonds of the Confederacy; the proceeds were used to build
the (Confederate Navy Ships)  Alabama, Florida, Georgia, the Shenandoah, fast sailing ships and their auxiliaries.

These were built in Great Britain and the headquarters of the CF Navy was in Liverpool,
as all the CF ports were blockaded. They swank (sank?)  $15,000,000 worth of United States
shipping without taking a prize into an Admiralty court, and without firing a shot at an armed enemy.

(That is, a Proxy Navy built by Britain, staffed by the Confederate States of America, Inc., personnel,  ravaged $15 million of our non-naval merchant shipping very, very quietly.) 

Great Britain also spent $5,000,000 on her own navy, and at the time of the Trent af-
fair embarked 8000 troops for Canada to attack Lincoln from Toronto.

(That is, Great Britain, a Territorial Investment Company, spent $5 million of its own money and sent 8,000 troops to Canada, preparing to invade our country from the North — thereby hoping to open up a two-front offensive on the Union Army.) 

The Spanish fleet, at the time in Cuban waters, arrived to invest (invade) Vera Cruz Dec. 14th, 1861. The British and French fleets arriving Jan. 6th and 7th of 1862. 

France supplied 30,000 troops for this campaign.

(It’s clear that these European Governments were allied in a conspiracy against our country and against our lawful government in all respects; they were the Investors bankrolling the United States of America, Inc., as an Ally of the Northern States-of-States, at the same time that they were preparing as a consortium of interests to attack our country and split it up along old Colonial lines. The Holy See in charge of the Federal Civil Service stood with the Southern States-of-States in an effort to retain the institution of slavery, upon which both it and its Roman affiliates depend.) 

Quoting again from R. Rogers Smith’s account: 

“The Czar of Russia takes a Hand

Still smarting from the Crimean War 1854-1856, the Czar, to disrupt the scheme of the European Allies, sent his powerful Baltic squadron to New York harbor and his Pacific squadron to San Francisco. His action had the desired effect. Great Britain and Spain withdrew their fleets from Vera Cruz leaving the burden of supporting the Emperor Maximilian entirely to France. 

He (Maximilian) was eventually taken prisoner and with two of his Generals, court-martialed and shot.

When Lincoln won the Civil War, France was informed in plain terms “that the United States would not tolerate a French force or the existence of any foreign Monarchy in Mexico”. On Jan. 14th, 1866, Napoleon ordered his General in Mexico to withdraw the troops.” 

You might think that this was the end of European meddling in our affairs, but sadly, owing to the fact that the United States of America, Inc. and its immediate Successor, the Scottish corporation calling itself The United States of America, Inc., continued to exist, we have suffered six generations of illegal British Territorial occupation of our country. 

It is interesting to note that absolutely none of this history is ever taught in any American Public School. 

So far as our children have known and grown up believing, Britain, France, Spain, and Austria have always been our firm friends, and Russia has been our enemy.  

In fact, Russia saved our bacon and honored the American-Russian Alliance of 1858, and has continued to keep faith with this country through two World Wars. 

The irony of this is not lost on the actual American Government, our unincorporated Federation of States. 

Everyone should recognize that the old European Monarchies and the Popes who granted the crowns of these Monarchs have deliberately sought to misrepresent Russia and to create enmity between our nations, for fear that if Russia, The United States, and China combine, the Monarchist hegemony in Western Europe and their cozy colonialist abuse of Africa, the Middle East, and the Commonwealth countries would be at an end. 

This is why our children have never been taught World History, nor even the history of our nearest neighbors, Canada and Mexico. 

It’s also why Russia has been demonized, though in fact, it has been our closest friend and most reliable Ally.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

April 26th 2024

—————————-

See this article and over 4700 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

METHODS OF CLAIMING YOUR STRAW MAN
THE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST

Oklahoma House passes bill denying jurisdiction in the state to WHO, UN and WEF, 72 to 21

Off to the Senate!

MERYL NASS

APR 26, 2024

Share

https://trackbill.com/bill/oklahoma-senate-bill-426-world-health-organization-prohibiting-enforcement-of-policies-required-or-recommended-by-the-world-health-organization-effective-date-emergency/2548665

BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:

SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified

in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6301 of Title 74, unless there

is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

A. The World Health Organization, the United Nations and the

World Economic Forum shall have no jurisdiction in the State of

Oklahoma. The state and its political subdivisions, including, but

not limited to, counties, cities, towns, precincts, water districts,

school districts, school administrative units, or quasi-public

entities, shall not engage in the enforcement of, or any

collaboration with the enforcement of, any requirements,

instructions, mandates, recommendations, or guidance provided by the

World Health Organization, the United Nations or the World Economic

Forum.

B. Any mandates, recommendations, instructions, communications

or guidance issued by the World Health Organization, the United

Nations or the World Economic Forum shall not be used in this state

as a basis for action, nor to direct, order or otherwise impose,

contrary to the constitution and laws of the State of Oklahoma any

requirements whatsoever, including those for masks, vaccines or

medical testing, or gather any public or private information about

the state’s citizens or residents, and shall have no force or effect

in the State of Oklahoma.

SECTION 2. This act shall become effective June 1, 2024.

SECTION 3. It being immediately necessary for the preservation

of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby

declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and

be in full force from and after its passage and approval.”

Passed the House of Representatives the 24th day of April, 2024.

Subscribe to Meryl’s COVID Newsletter

By Meryl Nass · Thousands of paid subscribers

Disentangling COVID, WHO and global governance disinformation

Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Implications for the Future of the DOD

ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD

MAY 16, 2023

CROSS-POST FROM HUMANITY UNITED NOW – ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD

They’ve been doing it unbeknown to soldiers since at least 1998 DARPA project which ran until 2006. I just had to make known the unknown. 🙂 – 

420MedicineMan

Cyborg Soldier 2050 Cbc Tr 1599

591KB ∙ PDF file

Download

I am posting this paper because people need to understand how our military has moved forward on studying the creation of Cyborg Human Machines. It discusses that the health care system will get society used to human machine augmentation. Remember that Sasha Latypova explained much about the connections of the Department of Defense and the C19 injection roll out. The Military has been developing many human augmentation strategies for decades. I have excerpted a few paragraphs. Note that they use nanotechnologies for brain augmentation. In the study they discuss optogenetics light control for physical enhancement. I have discussed optogenetic mechanisms for the C19 shots before:

Understanding Gene Editing Via Optogenetic

PART 2: The NASA Satellite PSYOP: Do Space Satellites Serve ANY Purpose?🛰️ THE GRAND FINALE

Another day, another rabbit hole…

AGENT131711

APR 24, 2024

Share

I used to work with this really short guy whose face looked eerily like a pug dog. Behind his back we all jokingly called him Conspiracy Rob because he would say the most ridiculous sh*t, like, “Space is fake” and, “Vaccines are poison, if I ever have kids I wouldn’t vaccinate them” and even, “The government is spraying the skies to kill the trees because they give us oxygen and the government has a population control agenda”… what a lunatic! One of my coworkers made him a literal tinfoil hat and slipped it onto his desk at lunch break. Everyone snickered when he came back with his fruit smoothie and saw it. Yep, Rob was the laughing-stock of the office, but 12 years later, I have debated trying to locate Conspiracy Rob to apologize… and buy him a fruit smoothie… and a tub of survival food…

Upgrade to paid

I never thought I would write so much NASA content, because, quite frankly, it’s a topic that never interested me… until it started overlapping with everything I was researching, I mean EVERYTHING. Looking into GeoEngineering? There’s NASA. Dinosaurs? NASAFreemasons? NASAAgenda 2030 and 2050? NASA. This forced me to start looking into NASA, and the more you look, the less sense anything we are being told makes… and here we are today, asking, “Are NASA Satellites nothing more than a Psychological Operation?”, which I thought would be a single article, but I stumbled across so much crazy information that it turned out to be a series.

In Part 1 of this series we looked at the pretty strange history of space satellites, which started unofficially in the 1940s, when we were shown the first photos of space and told these images show the curve of the earth. According to history, these photos, taken in space, were not taken by “satellites”, they were taken by rockets releasing balloons with a camera attached to them.

Although the goal of the piece was only to look at how satellites came to be, it was important to verify that the images really did show curve, so we took them into Photoshop, adjusted the orientation and compared them to straight lines:

Continue: https://open.substack.com/pub/chemtrails/p/part-2-are-nasa-satellites-a-psyop?r=1qpmbr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web