Originally posted on Land & Livestock International, Inc.: If you think our federal government or states care if you are who you say you are, you are wrong. The Real ID circus will only put the icing on the cake. Since the states started exchanging driver’s license information along with he passport system, we have…
By The Conscious Resistance Fox 26 Houston’s Isiah Carey sits down with journalist Derrick Broze to discuss the 5G roll out taking place in Houston and across the country. Thanks to Isiah for taking the time to discuss this important issue. http://www.isiahfactor.com/ *Originally recorded on October 24, 2018 and aired on Fox 26 Houston…
The Negative Alien agenda NAA is to force the planet to serve another multiple species Controller agenda, through imposing false replicated time fields using bio-warfare technology such as Holographic Inserts, AI and Mind Control, namely created under genetically “reptilian based” Archons extraterrestrials, at the expense and life force of the human race and the kingdoms under human domain. Much of this NAA is veiled in the shadow levels of the ET and human military industrial complex, and primarily the takeover source is in the naval forces and underground bases on earth. It appears earth was invaded several times by hostile Negative Aliens with a major shift occurring 26,000 years ago during the Luciferian Rebellion, Atlantian Cataclysm and leading to the latest massive invasion in the Sumerian-Egypt Invasion. These agendas are still in effect today and impact all human and earthly life as a enforced enslavement on prison planet being harvested for a variety of resources to send back to off planet Controllers, such as energetic quanta of the human life force and earthly minerals.
Phantom or False Timelines
The Black Suns when attempting to appear “friendly” promote their high IQ and the sharing of technology as if it is beneficial for humanity, when its application is highly destructive to the natural organic Consciousness evolution of the human race to reach its highest DNA potentials. Grey Alien Black Sun Program technology is not our friend, it is designed to irresponsibly warp and rip our time fields, through black hole technology, blank slate erasure of memories, while promoting rapid uses of forced artificial intelligence technology, such as SPE tech, like EMP Pulsing, to our military, that hurts and destroys our planet, and instigates war with the humans of our own global race. They also promote use of “supposed” healing technologies (“inorganic and artificial replicant matrices”) that are designed to remove pain physically, or have physical results in other uses, however, the “technology” is intended to enslave the Soul or place a variety of Alien Implants the human body. They also project holographic mirages and “pretty inserts” to keep an abductee or SRA mind control target calm while they gain control of the person’s aura. In shorthand, this is externalized Black Magic and is ultimately harmful to the organic spiritual bodies and organic auric field of human and planetary Consciousness.
This creates interference with the person’s ability to connect with their own spiritual source directly or have control over their thoughts, feelings or bio-neurological functions.
It is this specific reason of spiritual interference, that there is a Founder Guardian and Krystal Star intervention on planet earth. They were not born here on this planet, this is not their domain, and there is a reason for that.
Because the planet is ready to drop and collapse Timelines from the previous 3D cycle [May 2012], there is a struggle to dominate upcoming events that would influence these future timelines to be solely in Negative Alien controls. These groups have infighting, and the two primary groups (Belial Suns and Black Suns) have infected their headquartered control mechanism in two major stargates and power vortexes on the planet. Black Suns have headquartered themselves in the 10th Stargate Iran-Iraq Gate and lodged their technologies in Iraq/Iran and the power spots in Giza, Egypt. Most of them are Dark Angelic E.T.’s sourcing from Fallen Seraphim genetic lines, and this is why they chose that area of the planet, it was easier to invade from the genetic key level.
DNA The Black Suns are also referred to as “Black Suns” from their DNA genetic lineage.
They are primarily form the Satanic class network family although they work and cooperate with the Luciferian families to control the planet and share the spoils of “war”. They cannot cellularly transmute their body in out of Stargates easily and use humans to do that. They access limited levels of biological immortality through the vampirism and siphoning of other living things, such as the planet earth. 
Brainwashed into slavery | published circa 1940 By KENNETH GOFF Editorial Note Psychopolitics, a less known division of geopolitics, is the art of capturing the minds of a nation through brainwashing and ‘fake’ mental health – the subjecting of whole nations of people to the rule of the Kremlin by the capturing of their minds. […]
We are told that the United Nations (UN) is an international organization that aims to facilitate co-operation through social progress, economic development, international security and international law. They promote themselves, and are outwardly promoted as a reputable body that deals with peace, security, development, human rights and humanitarian affairs. With this being the case it’s no surprise to see the UN at the forefront of all international conflict and instability, since these exact events give them the ideal atmosphere to promote themselves as bringers of all that I previously mentioned. Throughout history, authoritative figures have always tried to paint a perception of themselves in hopes of influencing and brainwashing the masses into a desired agenda.
By promoting themselves, I am referring to the UN’s use of mainstream media networks, like CNN. CNN is owned by Time Warner (1), which is owned by JP Morgan Chase and Company and Dodge & Cox Inc, to name a few (2). It also has a select group of direct holders, like Jeffrey L. Bewkes. Mr. Bewkes sits in the head office of Time Warner’s two towers built in 2001 -buildings purposely built to resemble the once standing World Trade Centers of New York City. Bewkes is also a member of The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (3),which is headed and funded by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families (4)(5). In fact a large majority of mainstream media network owners are all members of the CFR, as well as the trilateral commission. Another example of this is Richard D. Parsons. who served as Time Warner’s Chairman of the Board from May 2003 to January 2009. Currently Mr. Parsons is a member of the Board of Trustees and is a Senior Advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation(6). I could even go on to look at Frank J. Caufield, another major direct holder of Time Warner Corp, who is also a member of the CFR(7). Let me remind you again, that CNN is owned by Time Warner Corp, which is owned by a number of individuals and corporations that are run by a few families. These families hide behind the corporations they run, using the employees and politicians they hire to do their dirty work. Why we continue to hand our perception of what is happening on the planet to a select few who show no regard for the human race is beyond me. As a child, I did not understand how a human being could have such negative intentions, and create so much conflict through the use of trickery. To this day I still believe that a human being cannot do what these “governing bodies” and multinational corporations do. Whether or not it holds the same effect on you, I hope the connections above at least raise an eyebrow for you.
There is no need for me to point out the JP Morgan (major institutional holder of Time Warner)/ Rockefeller connections, which also played a big role in the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1912. So what does all this have to do with the United Nations? Well, the same ones that own all of our mainstream media networks, also own, run and created the United Nations. The owners of the United Nations use their media networks to influence the perception of billions of people. Not many people know that our mainstream media networks are owned by less than 5 multinational corporations, and all of these corporations have ties to the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. If you dive in even further, all of the same corporations are directly related to suppressing clean energy technologies, like General Electric. You can find out more about free energy suppression here. More ties can be made in the food and medical industries as well. Our planet is owned by a small group of families and the corporations they run, this is no longer a secret, no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s becoming evident that these “people” do not have our best intentions at hand.
League of Nations/Treaty of Versailles
The forerunner to the United Nations, was the league of Nations. It was created under the treaty of versailles in 1919 (8)(14). Many believe the idea of the UN’s creation was due to the second world war, it wasn’t. A plan for global control through a well disguised body of peace started long before 1945. The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization created at the Paris peace conference that ended the First World War. Development of international organizations due to conflict is a way of trickery. The UN was created in 1945 as a result of World War 2. Anytime there is global conflict, something is created out of that conflict, to give the illusion that whatever is created out of that conflict is a direct solution to that conflict. Have you ever thought that the ones who created the conflict, are doing so in order to propose the solution? What a scam that would be, wouldn’t it? What a trick, using and controlling our will. Handing our will over to those who look to take advantage of us, to those that are not in service to others, but to themselves. The League of Nations was created by the Rockefeller Family, they were responsible for funding the entire operation(9). At the same time, the International Labour Organization was developed, which is and was heavily funded by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families(10). It is clear that the Rockefeller and Rothschild families both created the United Nations, without them the development of this global organization would not be possible.
The Same Groups That Funded Nazi Germany Created The United Nations? Both Sides of the War Were Funded by the Same Group?
A key question we must ask ourselves when it comes to international global governing bodies is, who is in charge? Who is making the decisions? What connections can be made between the United Nations and the other major governing bodies of planet Earth? How often do we ask these questions? And how often do we make the connections? If the United Nations was created for peace and stability in conflicting War time, why would the same parties fund both sides of the war? Was it just for profit, or did they want to create War, to create government bodies that would control our entire planet? The United Nations has branched off into the World Health Organization, which has other branched within it like Codex Alimentarius and the Food and Drug Administration.
I’m talking about Paul M. Warburg, a German-born banker, who was an appointed member of the Federal Reserve System, on the board of governors(11). Isn’t the Federal Reserve a United States entity? He was heavily involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, and his family was heavily involved with I.G Farben. I.G Farben was the largest chemical company in the world during its time, and one of the largest industrial booms next to the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, and General Motors. I.G Farben was responsible for numerous war crimes, supplying the Nazis with weapons and even funding the Nazi party(12)(13). Why would the federal reserve system and the Rockefeller’s be involved with I.G Farben? Isn’t the federal reserve an American entity? Did they not fund the United States as well? Paul Warburg and his family were involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Warburg family headed I.G Farben, a company that supported the Nazi movement. So what is going on here? There is a lot of evidence to show that both sides of World War II were funded by the same people, so I think a “fast one” has been pulled over our eyes. The Federal Reserve is still in tight with the Warburg family, as they have transformed themselves into several multinational corporations and financial institutions, like Warburg Pincus(15)(16).
It’s no secret that the Bush family also heavily profited from the war. Did you know that the Bush family also had members connected to the federal reserve, and that the Bush family is also very close to the Rockefeller family?(17). It’s not a secret that the presidency has always been connected to the Federal Reserve. Prescott Bush even worked for the Nazis, he worked with and profited from companies that were funding Hitler. With all of these connections, it is easy to see how the real founders of the United Nations (if you follow the money) were connected to many inhumane acts. So what makes you think it has stopped today? What if the United Nations give you the illusion of a peace making body, in order to drive chaos, fear, and to fulfill an agenda that started long before we were all born? How can the UN protect us against mining corporations for example, that commit atrocities all over the world, when the same ones who created the UN own all of the major mining corps, like the Rockefeller Hughes Corporation(18). I’ve provided sources for all of my claims, at the same time I like to leave a few out to inspire the readers to do some research. Feel free to look into the Bush connections yourself! Keep in mind, I’ve used only a few examples and connections in this article, there is a tremendous amount that you can make on your own if you are sparked to further your research.
One aspect of the current consciousness shift is waking up to new facts and possibilities of what really happened in our recent human history. Many people take different paths to awakening, but in the end it all leads to one thing: we have to be the change we want to see. We’ve seen a lot of turmoil throughout the years on this planet, and in turn it’s created a very dense energetic state for planet Earth. More people are starting to find peace, they are experiencing more joy and desire change for all on planet Earth. Through awakening, we are changing the vibrational frequency of the planet. We’ve been blind to many things for thousands of years. We are living in the age of transparency, everything has presented itself for us to see from the “darkest” experiences to the “lightest”. Either way you look at it, everything that has and is playing out on planet Earth is all an experience for the human race. Events happen, in order to jolt us into waking up to truth. 9/11 for example, woke many up. Whether it’s the truth about hemp, the federal reserve, the illuminati, extraterrestrials, spreading love, or anything else, the age of transparency is leading to a new truth within billions of people, and that truth is love. Love is required as a necessary building block for a new world. We are responsible for what is happening here, when we awaken from our sleep, I’m sure we won’t let continue what we’ve let continue for so long. No longer will we be used to uphold a system that does not resonate with us, instead we will create a new one that makes the old one obsolete.
There are multiple sources that go beyond mine, I could have used many more. Please feel free to do your own research to further verify some facts.
Many are calling this the first public declaration of the long feared “New World Order” or the beginnings of a totalitarian one world government.
Whether or not one believes in the so-called conspiracy theory of the New World Order, the phrase “new universal agenda” and the phrase “New World Order” share the same linguistic meaning. The question is then, are they one in the same?
Originally a plan called Agenda 21 was released by the UN with a primary focus solely on environmental issues.
That plan has now morphed into Agenda 2030 and is being labeled “Agenda 21 on steroids.” This new agenda now addresses virtually all areas of human activity and is truly a blueprint for global governance.
At first glance, this agenda appears to be combating every serious problem on the global stage. Yet when one delves deeper into the logistics of the plan, it becomes clear that the act of suggesting what should be done, and having a solution to a problem, are two very different things.
To throw up a lofty goal such as, “End poverty in all its forms,” is substantially different from having an actual solution to poverty itself.
The agenda does list sub goals within the plan, yet these as well are objective goals that would have already been achieved if simply agreeing on them would have solved the problem; such as Goal 1A: “Ensure significant mobilization of resources from a variety of sources.”
This is incredibly vague and is something that no one will disagree on, which is the point. Yet again, actually making this happen is the same problem as before and places the agenda directly back in square one.
It is as if to suggest that until now, no one has officially decided to “end poverty,” and now that a global agenda has been declared, the poverty-ending “plan” will be shared with all in need.
This raises the obvious question: What happens to the countries that decide not to participate? Will their country be exempt from the universal poverty-ending plan?
As far as the media is concerned, these topics are not very important.
It is quite odd that a plan of such relevance, such magnitude, is being completely disregarded by the mainstream media. The entire planet is going to be committing to work toward seventeen mutual goals and there has been a complete media blackout in the United States.
Most Americans are unaware of this worldwide agenda, and that in itself should be alarming. A lack of reporting on a specific topic by the corporate media is the modern tell-tale sign of a topic this is actually news-worthy.
When there is a media black-out on a story or event, it is most likely a subject worth paying attention to.
To collectively combat these major issues (from a citizen level) as a world-wide entity, is a step in the right direction.
However, these bullet point goals and their ambiguous means in which to reach the end result, have endless openings to be abused by the very same officials in which abuse every opportunity that is presented to them.
This country’s history is riddled with political deception and manipulation of the public, and this worldwide plan has vast opportunity for the corrupt to follow suit.
Below is a comprehensive list of Agenda 2030’s goals and how these goals will be approached from the corrupt level of the United States political system; which in turn will dictate the development of the new universal order.
“The UN document promises that this plan will ‘transform our world for the better by 2030,’ and yet very few Americans have even heard of the 2030 Agenda at this point.
“Instead, most of us seem to be totally obsessed with the latest celebrity gossip or the latest nasty insults that our puppet politicians have been throwing around at one another.
“It absolutely amazes me that more people cannot understand that Agenda 2030 is a really, really big deal. When will people finally start waking up?” – Zero Hedge
Agenda 2030 Decrypted
Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Translation: UN propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Translation: Population control through forced “Family Planning”
Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing
Goal 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Translation: TPP, free trade zones that favor megacorporate interests
Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Translation: Toll roads, push public transit, remove free travel, environmental restrictions
Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries
Translation: Even more regional government bureaucracy
Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state
Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Translation: Forced austerity
Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Translation: Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, footprint taxes
Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Translation: Environmental restrictions, control all oceans including mineral rights from ocean floors
Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Translation: More environmental restrictions, more controlling resources and mineral rights
Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Translation: UN “peacekeeping” missions (ex 1, ex 2), the International Court of (blind) Justice, force people together via fake refugee crises and then mediate with more “UN peacekeeping” when tension breaks out to gain more control over a region, remove 2nd Amendment in USA
Goal 17: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
Translation: Remove national sovereignty worldwide, promote globalism under the “authority” and bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy of the UN
And don’t forget the One World Religion under the One World Pope!
The UN have unveiled their masterplan for the next 14 years – saying that they wish to implement global socialism and corporate fascism as part of their “Agenda 2030” plans.
Part of their plans, officially dubbed “Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals,” aims to reduce inequality worldwide by forcing individual governments and citizens alike to share their wealth under the guidance of a one world government.
In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive sector will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes — not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely through domestic socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.
Wealth redistribution alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize control of the means of production — either directly or through fascist-style mandates. “We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services,” the document states. It also says that “governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns … to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production.”
In plain English, the Agenda 2030 document is claiming that today’s “consumption and production” patterns are unsustainable, so we’ll need to get by with less. How much less? It would be hard to find a more clear and concise assessment than that offered by the late Maurice Strong, the recently deceased Canadian billionaire and longtime UN environmental guru who led the 1992 Earth Summit, in a pre-Earth Summit document: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class … involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and ‘convenience’ foods, ownership of motor vehicles, numerous electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning … expensive suburban housing … are not sustainable.”
In truth, such “lifestyles and consumption patterns” are sustainable, so long as the freedom that makes prosperity possible is not destroyed in the name of achieving “sustainability.” The UN and the environmental lobby claim that we must get by with less because there are now too many people on the planet consuming too many resources. But this rationale for accepting UN-imposed scarcity is patently false.
Of course, the promoters of Agenda 2030 would claim that rather than impoverish us, the global regime they envision would take good care of us — through universal health coverage, for instance. One of the targets for Goal 3, ensuring “healthy lives” and “well-being,” is: “Achieve universal health coverage,” including “vaccines for all.” Universal access to “mental health,” along with “sexual and reproductive health-care services” — code words for abortion and contraception — are also included. All governments are expected to integrate such services into their “national strategies and programmes,” the agreement demands.
It is worth noting that mass-murdering Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin made clear that controlled healthcare is the “keystone” of socialism. The United Nations obviously agrees. And though he may not call it “socialism,” Obama undoubtedly also views government control of healthcare as key. Indeed, enactment of ObamaCare could be viewed as a “great leap forward” by the United States toward implementation of a key component of Agenda 2030, before Agenda 2030 was even “approved.”
But as important as targeting healthcare is to the globalist schemers, any plan for building international socialism would be lacking without also targeting the next generation with global-socialist propaganda. And so an entire goal of Agenda 2030 is devoted to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are transformed into what the UN calls “agents of change,” ready to push forward the plan for the new global order. “Children and young women and men are critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world,” the agreement explains.
The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement. “By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development,” the global plan for 2030 states. Considering what the UN means by “sustainable development” — population control, central planning, global governance, and more — the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.
“Sustainable” children for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what the UN misleadingly refers to as “education.” In the UN document the word “education” alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new “green” and “sustainable” world order. The UN’s education agenda also puts sex “education” front and center. “By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services [abortion and contraception], including for family planning, information and education,” the document explains.
How much will Agenda 2030 cost? Various figures have been thrown around by UN bureaucrats regarding the monetary costs of the plan, generally ranging between $3 trillion and $5 trillion per year.
Yes, trillions. In the “From Billions to Trillions” report released by the World Bank in July 2015, the globalist outfit, a key player in Agenda 2030, conceded: “To meet the investment needs of the Sustainable Development Goals, the global community needs to move the discussion from ‘Billions’ in ODA [Official Development Assistance] to ‘Trillions’ in investments of all kinds: public and private, national and global, in both capital and capacity.”
But the money needed to implement Agenda 2030 and other UN schemes is only part of the cost. Other parts include the loss of our national independence and freedom that the rise of global governance and global socialism would surely entail. Revealingly, empowering dictators to help in global governance is openly touted by Agenda 2030. The document states, “We recommit to broadening and strengthening the voice and participation of developing countries [the regimes ruling those countries] — including African countries, least developed countries, land-locked developing countries, small-island developing States and middle-income countries — in international economic decision-making, norm-setting and global economic governance.”
When Agenda 2030 was adopted at the 70th annual UN General Assembly confab in New York City on September 25, the UN plot to re-engineer civilization was ushered in with a “thunderous standing ovation,” the UN Department of Public Information reported. Every one of the 193 UN member governments on the planet — from murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships to those ruling what remains of the “Free World” — vowed to help impose the UN’s controversial goals on their subjects.
It all sounded so wonderful to some of the world’s most brutal dictators that they could hardly contain their glee. “This agenda promises a brave new world, a new world which we have to consciously construct, a new world that calls for the creation of a new global citizen,” gushed Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe, the genocidal mass-murderer enslaving Zimbabwe who also serves as chairman of the African Union. “I want to believe that we are up to this task that we have voluntarily and collectively committed ourselves to. Our success, and in particular the promise of a new world that awaits us, depends upon this commitment.” He also promised to vigorously impose the UN Agenda 2030 on the starving and impoverished victims his regime lords over with Agenda 2030-style policies. The communist Castro regime vowed to work with socialist Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro and other tyrants to impose the UN goals on their victims, too — all with financing from Western taxpayers.
The brutal tyrants ruling Communist China, meanwhile, have also been enthusiastic cheerleaders for the UN goals — goals that the regime boasted it played a “crucial role” in developing. The Chinese autocracy, infamous for forced abortions, censorship, religious and political persecution, the “one-child policy,” terrible pollution, kangaroo courts, and of course, murdering more human beings than any other entity in all of human history, used its vast, global propaganda machine to celebrate Agenda 2030.
“China has made important contributions to the global efforts in reaching a fair, inclusive and sustainable post-2015 development agenda,” the regime’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Wang Min, was quoted as saying in a report by the Communist Chinese news and espionage service Xinhua. “China is also very active in putting forward Chinese proposals…. The agreement includes important proposals by China and many other developing countries in numerous aspects.”
Among other “commitments,” China promised to spend $2 billion in foreign countries to meet the UN goals in “education” and “health,” with its funding increasing to $12 billion by 2030. While only contributing a small piece of the pie, the fact that Beijing is so excited about the agenda is quite revealing. Echoing Chairman Mao’s rhetoric, EU and NATO globalist Javier Solana said, “With a sustained commitment from all countries, developed and developing alike, the world can ensure that it celebrates another great leap forward in 2030.” (Emphasis added.) The last “Great Leap Forward,” presided over by Chairman Mao Tse-tung between 1958 and 1963, resulted in the murder of an estimated 45 million Chinese who were worked, starved, or beaten to death.
The Obama administration, which apparently does not plan to present the UN scheme to the U.S. Senate for ratification as required by the U.S. Constitution, also offered a forceful defense of the UN agenda. Speaking to the UN General Assembly on September 27, 2015, after purporting to commit the United States to the global plot, Obama claimed the UN blueprint “is one of the smartest investments we can make in our own future.”
Even the world’s leading religious figure, Pope Francis, addressed UN member governments with a plea to support the UN goals. “The adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development … is an important sign of hope,” he declared, before demanding a UN “climate” regime as well.
Beyond governments and religious figures, much of the private sector also enthusiastically backed the new goals. Among the mega-corporations backing the scheme are the world’s top three search engines: Google, Microsoft’s Bing, and Yahoo. It was not immediately clear whether those corporations’ support for the UN agenda would affect the supposed impartiality of search results, but critics of the UN plan expressed alarm nonetheless.
For now, at least, the world and the White House are all pretending that the SDGs are binding on Americans, too. However, the U.S. Senate was not consulted, as the Constitution requires for all treaties. And even if the Senate were to ratify it, the federal government cannot grant itself new anti-constitutional powers merely by approving a treaty. Therefore, the agreement has no force in the United States. But as UN Agenda 21 showed clearly, that does not mean that the Obama administration, and possibly future presidents, would not attempt to push it forward anyway. The American people, therefore, must demand through their elected representatives that the UN power grab be stopped.
Speak Out Against REAL ID
Stop REAL ID! Submit comments to the Dept. of Homeland Security by May 8th!
- UPDATE: DHS has released an e-mail address where you can submit REAL ID comments. The subject line must include the Docket No. DHS-2006-0030. Send your comments to email@example.com. Click here to open an e-mail window with the sample comments included.
- A broad coalition of organizations across the United States is urging the public to submit comments rejecting the illegal national identification system created under the Department of Homeland Security’s REAL ID program.
- Five states and several members of Congress have rejected the scheme, which creates a massive national ID system without adequate security or privacy safeguards, which makes it more difficult and costly for people to get licenses, and which makes it easier for identity thieves to access the personal data of 245 million license and cardholders nationwide.
- To take action and submit comments against this fundamentally flawed national ID system, click here! Comments are due by 5pm EST on May 8, 2007.
To take action and make your voice heard, submit comments against the fundamentally flawed national identification scheme. The draft regulations to implement the REAL ID Act are open for comment until 5:00 PM EST on May 8, 2007. The comments can be submitted in one of three ways:
- E-mail: Send to firstname.lastname@example.org. Include DHS-2006-0030 in the subject line.
- Online through the Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov (search for “DHS-2006-0030-0001” and follow the instructions for submitting comments);
- Fax to 1-866-466-5370. Your fax must state that you are submitting comments in response to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DHS-2006-0030.
- Postal Mail sent to Department of Homeland Security; Attn: NAC 1-12037; Washington, D.C. 20538. Your letter must state that you are submitting comments in response to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DHS-2006-0030.
Click here for sample comments you can print, sign and send in.
Organizations have launched a nationwide campaign to engage the public in the debate over what would be the first national identification document. These transpartisan, nonpartisan, privacy, consumer, civil liberty, civil rights, and immigrant organizations have joined in this unique public education project because the REAL ID proposal put forth by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would harm our lives in a multitude of ways every day. The proposed regulations set requirements that states must follow to have their state issued identification documents accepted for federal purposes, like getting on an airplane or entering a government building, including courthouses.
The power of the Department of Homeland Security, along with other federal government agencies, to reach into the everyday lives of people living in this country will be unprecedented.
This is the same federal agency that had responsibility for helping people following Hurricane Katrina, and proved itself not to be ready for the challenge. Creating a national identification system is a huge, complex project and there no agency in the Federal government that has proven that it could manage a project of this magnitude.
What we do know: You will make more than one trip to the motor vehicle office to apply for your REAL ID national identification card; the government has estimated that the scheme will cost taxpayers $21 billion; REAL ID requires documentation that most people will have difficulty finding; and the cost of driver’s licenses and state ID cards will skyrocket. We do know that the federal government is considering expanding the REAL ID card to everyday use.Click for more background…
- DHS: Real ID Proposed Guidelines: Questions and Answers
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Liberty Coalition
- Privacy Activism
- Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
- Wikipedia entry on REAL ID
- American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations
- American Library Association
- “There are serious privacy and security issues with the REAL ID Act,” said Loriene Roy, ALA President-Elect. “ALA has expressed deep concern about standardized machine-readable driver’s licenses and national identification cards because of the potential privacy implications for library users, as well as the increased potential for identity theft for all individuals.”
- American Policy
- American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
- Carol Khawly, Director of Legal Advocacy at ADC, states that “as a community, we fear that the REAL ID card will be used by different government agencies as well as private parties to profile individuals who look foreign or who have a foreign name.”
- Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund
- Association of American Physicians & Surgeons
- Bill of Rights Defense Committee
- Center for Digital Democracy
- Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights
- Citizen Outreach Project
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- “REAL ID raises the specter of George Orwell’s 1984 the government controlling a central database of personal information, which could be used to monitor the comings and going of American citizens,” said CAGW President Tom Schatz.
- Coalition Against Prosecutorial Abuse
- Common Cause
- Computing Professionals for Social Responsibility
- Consumer Action
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- “Make no mistake, this is a national identification system that will affect your everyday life,” said Melissa Ngo, Director of EPIC’s Identification and Surveillance Project. “Critics of the REAL ID scheme are called anti-security, but it is not anti-security to reject a national identification system that will harm our national security and make it easier for criminals to pretend to be law-abiding Americans.”
- Fairfax County Privacy Council
- Give Me Back My Rights Coalition
- Government Accountability Project
- Gun Owners of America
- Immigrant Workers Union
- Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
- Liberty Coalition
- National Center for Transgender Equality
- National Council of Jewish Women
- National Council of La Raza
- National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
- National Immigration Law Center
- Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays
- Patient Privacy Rights Foundation
- People for the American Way
- Privacy Activism
- “The breadth and diversity of the opposition is a real testimony to how harmful Real ID is to so many different communities,” said Deborah Pierce, Executive Director of PrivacyActivism.org and one of the founders of the Stop Real ID Now! activism campaign. “By getting people and groups who are usually excluded from the debate involved at the grassroots level, we can stop Real ID.”
- “The Real ID Act of 2005 turns our state driver’s licenses into a national ID card, costs over $20 billion dollars, infringes privacy, and imposes major burdens on taxpayers, anybody renewing a driver’s license, seniors, immigrants, transgender people, and state governments – while doing nothing to protect against terrorism,” said privacy activist Jon Pincus, one of the founders of the Stop Real ID Now! activism campaign. “This commenting process is a great chance for the American people to tell DHS and Congress the Real ID Act is a bad law that needs to be repealed.”
- Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
- Privacy Times
- Republican Liberty Caucus
- Rutherford Institute, The
- The Arc of the United States United Cerebral Palsy
- The Multiracial Activist
- US Bill of Rights Foundation
- Virginia Citizens Defense League
- Virginia Gun Owners Coalition
- World Privacy Forum
- America’s Right to Privacy
- Arizona Citizens Defense League
- Asian American Justice Center
- Artist Activism Network
- Constitution Party of North Carolina
- Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering (CASPIAN)
- Consumer Federation of California
- Center for Democracy & Technology
- The Loyal Nine
- Oklahoma Defense of Freedom Project
- South Asian American Leaders of Tomorrow
- Young Democrats of America
Blog Posts covering the campaign:
- Schneier on Security: REAL ID Action Required Now (May 8)
- Worthless Ponderings: What REAL ID is and why you should care (May 8)
- Knitting with rocketships: Stop Big Brother (May 8)
- The Hackenblog: Just say no to the National ID card (May 8)
- Flouncy: My REAL ID Comments (May 8)
- Wax On: Bruce Stole my thunder (May 8)
- Jay Knight: Your chance to stop REAL ID (May 8)
- Suspended Nitrogen: Urgent: stop taxpayer dollars being wasted on a fake security id (May 8)
- Generalized Notes of Oberservation: Last Chance: REAL ID (May 8)
- Fueled by Caffiene: REAL ID Action Required Now (May 8)
- Core Dump: REAL ID Comments Close Tonight! (May 8)
- David Wilford’s LiveJournal: Please do this! (May 8)
- Have GNU, Will Travel: Speak Out against REAL ID (May 8)
- LibraryLaw Blog: Comments DUE TODAY to Dept. of Homeland Security (May 8)
- Victor Pillow the Musician: 5 hours to say no (May 8)
- Guy2k: Breaking: More Security Theatre? (May 8)
- The Militant Libertarian: Fight REAL ID (May 8)
- Rerilocity: REAL ID? No, Says DHS’s Advisors (May 8)
- Tattooed Dad: Act NOW to stop REAL ID (May 8)
- The New Citizenship Project: Last Day to Stop the REAL ID Act (May 8)
- Lis: “Your ID, please” Hell No!! (May 8)
- Clackablog: Fatherland Security, There You Go Again (May 8)
- Your Authority for Online Security: Will the REAL ID, please stand UP! (May 8)
- Threat Level: Panels Scrutinize Real ID Proposal (May 7)
- Campus Progress: EPIC Says: No to REAL ID (May 7)
- TLF: DHS Privacy Committee Declines to Endorse REAL ID (May 7)
- Cato @ Liberty: DHS Privacy Committee Declines to Endorse REAL ID (May 7)
- RochesterTurning: Action: Call DHS; oppose nation ID & Big Brother (May 7)
- The Technology Liberation Front: DHS Privacy Committee Declines to Endorse REAL ID (May 7)
- Laura: Stop REAL ID – Submit Comments Tonight! (May 7)
- Shekkara: Oppose REAL ID – send your comments to Dept. of Homeland Security (May 7)
- Boing Boing: One More Day to Stop REAL ID and keep Big Brother out of the US (May 7)
- The Crossed Pond: REAL ID Act – Public Comments (May 7)
- A Sociable Loner: The Assault on Liberty Continues (May 7)
- SunbeltBlog: Get grumpy about REAL ID (May 7)
- Hullabaloo: Action Items by Digby (May 7)
- Crimes and Curruption of the New World Order News: Tell Lieberman to stick REAL ID up his…(May 7)
- Twistedchick’s Free Speech Soapbox: awake! awake! fear! fire! foes! awake! awake! (May 7)
- Privacy Saved My Life: Stop REAL ID: Reject National Identification (May 7)
- Stop REAL ID Now:: Again… what’s wrong with REAL ID (May 6)
- Mr Sprinkles’ Indubitable News: Stop the REAL ID Act by May 8 (May 6)
- Marketing Whore: Your Information At Risk (May 4)
- Anti National ID Campaign: Anti National ID Campaign (May 4)
- Rantings of a New Yorker: Comment Deadline of May 8th is Quickly Approaching for REAL ID (May 4)
- Ales Rarus: REAL ID = Real Mistake (May 4)
- AYM Networked: Less than a week to stop REAL ID (May 4)
- News2U Worldwide News: Stop REAL ID! (May 3)
- Chronicles of Dissent: Stop REAL ID! (May 3)
- The Technology Liberation Front: REAL ID Comment Campaign (May 3)
- Lunog: Coalition Team-up to Defeat National ID(May 3)
- The Blog of M’Gath: Submit Comments Against REAL ID (May 3)
- ShoutPost – Alex Jones: The Rise of the Police State and Big Brother (May 3)
- BBspot: Stop REAL ID (May 3)
- Boston Tea: Fight the REAL ID (May 3)
- James Landrith: Taking the Gloves Off (May 3)
- News and Int’l PoliTRICKS: Stop the REAL ID Act by May 8 (May 3)
- Fly Me to Your Satellite: Stop REAL ID (May 3)
- Homeland Stupidity: Who Wants a National ID? (May 2)
- Cato @ Liberty: REAL ID Comment Campaign (May 2)
- Katie: Big Brother is getting closer (May 2)
- All his Engines…: Don’t Forget Folks (May 2)
- Consumer Thoughts: One week to Stop REAL ID (May 2)
- Privacy Activism: REAL ID: activism in high gear and what you can do (May 2)
- Emergent Chaos: Stop REAL ID (May 2)
- Protect Personal and Financial Privacy: REAL ID – Oppose Defacto National ID (May 1)
- ArsGeek: Stop Real ID. You’ve got a week. (May 1)
- Giles Bowkett: More Bush Administration Law-Breaking (May 1)
- The Civil Libertarian: Help STOP “Real ID” (May 1)
- Boing Boing: One week to stop REAL ID and save America from the surveillance state! (May 1)
- District Dispatch: ALA joins anti-National ID Campaign (May 1)
- Privacy Digest: Over Forty Groups Announce National REAL ID Public Campaign (May 1)
- Pogo Was Right: Forty-Three Groups Join Campaign to Stop REAL ID (May 1)
- Stop Real ID Now!: 43 organizations announce campaign to solicit comments! (May 1)
Visit Technorati.com to see all blog posts about the campaign. 203 blogs currently support the REAL ID campaign!
- Washington Post: Leahy, Others Speak Out Against New ID Standards (May 9)
- Voice of America News: Privacy Concerns, Cost, Jeopardize Plans For US Identity Card (May 8)
- CNet News: Congress rethinks the Real ID Act (May 8)
- Computerworld: Privacy Groups renew push against REAL ID bill (May 3)
- Washington Technology: Coalition attacks REAL ID Act regulations (May 2)