May 16, 2024:
Roger Andoh acting as FOIA Officer in the Office of the Chief Operating Officer confessed that the “experts” at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry have no studies/reports authored by anyone, anywhere, ever that:
used purified cultures of Haemophilus influenzae to scientifically prove or provide evidence of the CDC’s claim that said bacteria can cause pneumonia, meningitis, epiglotittis, cellulitis, arthritis, death, etc.
“The Division of Bacterial Diseases subject matter experts have reviewed and searched but found no examples that specifically address the request for repeatable, controlled experiments. Therefore, we have failed to locate any documents pertaining to your request.”
Roger continued:
“They have provided the following published articles that may be useful:
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/149/5/728/2190098
https://journals.asm.org/doi/epdf/10.1128/aac.31.8.1243
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002944010603938“
The 1st link leads to a horrific and invalid animal torture study by researchers at the Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, in which mice were “challenged” in an obscenely unnatural manner.
“Intratracheal inoculation procedure. Mice were infected with H influenzae by a technique detailed elsewhere [16]. In short, animals were anesthetized by ip injection of Brevital® (methohexital sodium; Eli Lilly) and suspended vertically by hanging of the lower incisor teeth on a wire hook and retaining of the upper incisors with a taut rubber band. The oropharynx was transilluminated, and under direct visualization the trachea was cannulated with a blunt-tipped metal spinal needle (no. 22 gauge) to which a microliter syringe containing the bacterial suspension was attached. After 0.06 ml of the suspension was delivered into the trachea, the cannula-syringe apparatus was removed. The animals were maintained in a vertical position for 2-4 min and then suspended at an angle of 45° until awake.”
The 2nd link goes to another unnatural animal torture study involving intraperitoneal injections passed off as “infections”, not even designed to test for pathogenicity of Haemophilus influenzae.
The 3rd link goes to a study investigating a mouse model of synergism between Haemophilus influenzae and imaginary “influenza virus”.
“Influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (A/PR/8/34; flu) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; VR-1469, Manassas, VA)…”
Here is the ATCC entry for the fake “Influenza A virus (H1N1) strain A/PR/8/34”.
“This strain was isolated in 1934 from a human patient in Puerto Rico…”
A 1935 study is referenced:
“Francis T. Immunological relationships of strains of filterable virus recovered from cases of human influenza. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 32: 1172-1175, 1935.”
In his 3-page study that lacks a detailed Methods section, author T. Francis states:
“Smith, Andrewes and Laidlaw isolated a filtrable virus from the nasopharyngeal washings of influenza patients following the inoculation of these materials into ferrets.”
So washings from some sick people were inoculated into ferrets in order to “isolate the virus” that had supposedly made the people sick 
. Francis continues:
“During the Autumn of 1934, at the Hospital of the Rockefeller Institute, we were successful in infecting ferrets and mice with strains of a filtrable virus obtained from the sputum of cases of epidemic influenza…”
In describing experiments investigating potential protective effects of sera, Francis refers to ground-up “infected” mouse lungs as “the source of virus” with which other mice were force-inoculated intranasally… after being anesthetized with ether.
No “virus” particles were identified, let alone sequenced, characterized and studied with valid controlled experiments to show that they actually behave as contagious “viruses” per today’s meaning of the word.
Back to Roger’s 3rd link regarding synergism between Haemophilus influenzae and the imaginary “influenza virus”, briefly, we find that stocks of this so-called “virus” were fake-“grown” (contaminated) in canine kidney cells and that:
“Mice were anesthetized with Avertin… and infected intranasally… with… plaque-forming units (PFU) of influenza in PBS. At various time points after primary influenza infection, some groups of mice were anesthetized again and infected … with… Hib bacteria in PBS or given PBS only as control. Some mice were only infected with Hib. Survival was monitored daily after the second infection.”
Which would make perfect sense in a world where mice (and people) go around anesthetizing and forcefully “infecting” each other intranasally with bacteria and imaginary “viruses”.
Roger cited 2 more irrelevant studies:
“You may also find these published articles useful:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22080119/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29509834/“
The titles are:
Current epidemiology and trends in invasive Haemophilus influenzae disease–United States, 1989-2008
and
Current Epidemiology and Trends in Invasive Haemophilus influenzae Disease-United States, 2009-2015.
Epidemiology is not a scientific discipline and cannot possibly provide scientific evidence of pathogenicity.
Communications:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CDC-Haemophilus-influenzae-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Official Confessions/Evidence Showing that Virology is Pseudoscience:
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (222 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Excel file listing 222 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Institution-list-for-website.xls
FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
FOIs re secretive and unscientifically “mock infected” cells (aka invalid controls) and fabricated “virus genomes”:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
3000+ pages of “virus” FOIs in compilation pdfs, and my notarized declarations re the anti-scientific nature of virology:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs
Failed freedom of information responses re contagion (plus links to extensive lists of failed attempts to demonstrate contagion – or even transmission of an illness via the injection (an invalid means of exposure) of bodily fluid/tissue from sick people or animals):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-responses-re-contagion/
Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/
Because “they” (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearly don’t exist and virology isn’t a science.
For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine
New Human New Earth Communities 